最近更新：2025-03-31
2023-cv-00432 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 04/30/2023 | SATISFACTION of Judgment as to Defendant no. 91 RLINGX Dealer 翻译
|
| 04/13/2023 | DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/13/2023. Mailed notice. 翻译
|
| 04/13/2023 | ORDER: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 25. The motion is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded in the amount of $100,000 per defendant, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its marks causes it irreparable harm in the form of diminished goodwill and brand confidence, damage to plaintiff's reputation, loss of exclusivity, and loss of future sales; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendant has appeared to argue otherwise, thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. To obtain release of the bond previously posted in this action, plaintiff's counsel must file a motion for the return of the bond once the preliminary injunction no longer applies to any defendant. Enter final Default Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/13/2023. Mailed notice. 翻译
|
| 04/11/2023 | STATUS Report by Jeff Bartels 翻译
|
| 04/11/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 47, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 30 lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian and No. 33 jkfgweeryhrt under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 30 lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian and No. 33 jkfgweeryhrt from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed an amended Schedule A form on the docket 48. 翻译
|
| 04/07/2023 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Jeff Bartels 翻译
|
| 04/07/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to Defendant no. 30 lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian and no. 33 jkfgweeryhrt 翻译
|
| 04/07/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:By 4/11/2023, plaintiff and any appearing defendants that remain in the case shall file a status report with an update on the status of all remaining defendants in the case (i.e., which defendants have appeared, any pending motions and to which defendants those motion(s) relate, the status of settlement discussions, and any other pertinent information as to the status of the case or matters the parties wish to raise). Emailed notice. 翻译
|
| 04/07/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 43, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 105 yes2ding and No. 84 qisngxacxcshcbbvaa under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 105 yes2ding and No. 84 qisngxacxcshcbbvaa from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 85758, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed an amended Schedule A form on the docket 44. Emailed notice. 翻译
|
| 04/06/2023 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Jeff Bartels 翻译
|
| 04/06/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to Defendant no. 105 yes2ding and no. 84 qisngxacxcshcbbvaa 翻译
|
| 04/04/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 40, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 103 DailyLifeArt, No. 73 lu ku han, and No. 12 putianshichengxiangquqinmiehuamaoyiyouxiangongsi under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 103 DailyLifeArt, No. 73 lu ku han, and No. 12 putianshichengxiangquqinmiehuamaoyiyouxiangongsi from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 85758, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended Schedule A form by 4/6/2023 identifying the remaining defendants. Emailed notice. 翻译
|
| 04/03/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant yes2ding's motion for extension of time to answer plaintiff's complaint 39 is granted. Defendant yes2ding's answer is due by 4/21/2023. Emailed notice. 翻译
|
| 04/03/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants 翻译
|
| 03/31/2023 | MOTION by Defendant yes2ding for extension of time to file answer 翻译
|
| 03/16/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 36, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 1 Tlovudori, No. 2 Aremetop, No. 102 Asminifor Direct, No. 106 Fukeen, No. 74 aguoppeng, No. 76 QWTGIUN PSMIH KBDU, No. 13 FANGCYZI, No. 20 xingyangjia, No. 11 dong haijuan, and No. 104 FJRUIFGV under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 1 Tlovudori, No. 2 Aremetop, No. 102 Asminifor Direct, No. 106 Fukeen, No. 74 aguoppeng, No. 76 QWTGIUN PSMIH KBDU, No. 13 FANGCYZI, No. 20 xingyangjia, No. 11 dong haijuan, and No. 104 FJRUIFGV from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. The amended Schedule A has already been filed separately on the docket 37. 翻译
|
| 03/15/2023 | Amended Schedule A 2 to Compalint 1 by Jeff Bartels 翻译
|
| 03/15/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants 翻译
|
| 03/13/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: As to defendant yes2ding: Defendant yes2ding's motion for extension of time to answer plaintiff's complaint 33 is granted. Defendant yes2ding's answer is due by 3/31/2023. 翻译
|
| 03/13/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 30, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 85 ling jing gui guai store, No. 87 hongxing E, No. 16 xinkaishengkeji, No. 19 The C Market, No. 27 KristiPeterson, No. 79 XUTAI, No. 81 Guojew, No. 35 HeyLi, No. 82 lijunpseng, and No. 7 HolandNana under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 85 ling jing gui guai store, No. 87 hongxing E, No. 16 xinkaishengkeji, No. 19 The C Market, No. 27 KristiPeterson, No. 79 XUTAI, No. 81 Guojew, No. 35 HeyLi, No. 82 lijunpseng, and No. 7 HolandNana from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. The amended Schedule A has already been filed separately on the docket 31. 翻译
|
| 03/10/2023 | MOTION by Defendant yes2ding for extension of time to file answer 翻译
|
| 03/10/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant yes2ding by Brian Swift 翻译
|
| 03/10/2023 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Jeff Bartels 翻译
|
| 03/10/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants 翻译
|
| 03/03/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A 翻译
|
| 02/20/2023 | NEW PARTIES: RLINGX Dealer, cwj01, cpw01, wyl01, siyushundianzishangwushop, Vaisravana Store, Ringqueens, Marsh Susanna, katangshangmao, haikouxiuyingsuliubaihuodian, Asminifor Direct, DailyLifeArt, FJRUIFGV, yes2ding, Fukeen, Monstary, GERCASE Direct, GTYANXD, ZZXYMX and CuteTHLStore added to case caption. 翻译
|
| 02/19/2023 | NEW PARTIES: zonXzon, liaozilin, Yoiwiiskw552, xiangjianmudianzishangwushop, QuXiangShuiX, pottwal Inc, VSRWASDA JIALE, WEITINGFEI, XIAODEGUO, Smartdollar, hainanshuaisupengmaoyiyouxiangongsi, caichangleidianzishangwu, dongguanjuhongshangmaoyouxianzerengongsi, ximinshangmaohang, xinshaoxianPSZB, chengxiangquxiangchumaoyiyouxiangongsi, hefeiquekuanggenwangfuzhuangyouxiangongsi, MTW Special PC, HODOYO, mingliushudianzishangwu, zhangminchengdianzishangwushop, ZhangXinShop, DingRound, shanghaiyiyunguanggaoyouxiangongsi, yiijianshop, tangyuping, lu ku han, aguoppeng, DongGuiic, QWTGIUN PSMIH KBDU, BAKER_Store, Wknoon, XUTAI, konglinggangdsfaasd, Guojew, lijunpseng, huangysangs, qisngxacxcshcbbvaa, ling jing gui guai store, Happy feifei Store, hongxing E, hms0x829, rongyixxzx and Pcjzgs added to case caption. 翻译
|
| 02/19/2023 | NEW PARTIES: Tlovudori, Aremetop, LiuYangShiJieCiMaoYiYouXianGongSi, NYIXIA, LWCDM, UMEETING, HolandNana, CVDVKDKJHFKJIDFD, Christopher BcGehee, lgogvi, dong haijuan, putianshichengxiangquqinmiehuamaoyiyouxiangongsi, FANGCYZI, Vipars, HkauATR, xinkaishengkeji, Lucky520, putianshihanjiangqushengminmaoyishanghang, The C Market, xingyangjia, Berg Hood, yin hongxing, bao longsheng, duweiwaf, PROEVER, adiucmcz, KristiPeterson, TaiGe, lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian, guizhoufengshenghenongyefazhanyouxiangongsi, HVSWAHPOI FEODHMEI, jkfgweeryhrt, chrsan03ma, HeyLi, Benjamin Pigou, XIONGSTORE, HFGHWREYWEYYRTU, RudolphTello, renedianzishangwushop, Consumiao, WangYaBin-shop, yunnanchaoguanzhongfuzhuangyouxiangongsi and Aidikis added to case caption. 翻译
|
| 02/16/2023 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/16/2023: 翻译
|
| 02/16/2023 | ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/16/2023. Mailed notice. 翻译
|
| 02/16/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: No defendant has appeared or filed an objection to the motion for preliminary injunction 21. A preliminary injunction is appropriate for the same reasons a TRO was granted and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 18 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. 翻译
|
| 02/08/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction 18 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 2/15/2023. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. 翻译
|
| 02/07/2023 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeff Bartels as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/7/2023, answer due 2/28/2023. 翻译
附件： 1:(Declaration of Service) |
| 02/07/2023 | MEMORANDUM by Jeff Bartels in support of motion for preliminary injunction 18 翻译
附件： 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:(Exhibit 1, Declaration of Keith Vogt) |
| 02/07/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for preliminary injunction 翻译
|
| 02/02/2023 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000.00 posted by Jeff Bartels (Document not scanned) 翻译
|
| 01/27/2023 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 翻译
|
| 01/27/2023 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/27/2023: 翻译
|
| 01/27/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's motions (10, 11, 12), the supporting memorandum 13 and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal 10 and for leave to file excess pages 11 are granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by email and/or electronic publication 12 is granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this district have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff genuinely intends to pursue an accounting, but at this preliminary stage, plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Clerk of Court ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), either cash or surety bond, as security. 翻译
|
| 01/26/2023 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jeff Bartels regarding memorandum in support of motion 13 翻译
附件： 1:Exhibit 2-1 2:(Exhibit 2-2) |
| 01/26/2023 | MEMORANDUM In Support of 12 Ex Parte Motion 翻译
附件： 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1-4, Declaration of Keith Vogt 3:Declaration of Jeff Bartels 4:(Exhibit 1, Declaration of Jeff Bartels) |
| 01/26/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for leave to file excess pages 翻译
|
| 01/26/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal 翻译
|
| 01/25/2023 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Adam Grodman 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Yi Bu 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Yanling Jiang 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Keith A. Vogt 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels Schedule A to Complaint (1) 翻译
|
| 01/24/2023 | COMPLAINT filed by Jeff Bartels ; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20270738. 翻译
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
