最近更新：2025-02-05
2024-cv-11472 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 01/16/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
|
| 01/15/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the notice of voluntary dismissal [29], this case is dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants. Absent reinstatement by 2/3/25, this dismissal shall automatically convert to a dismissal with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
译文：向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）提交的临时条目：根据自愿驳回通知[29]，本案被驳回，不损害所有被告。如果在25年2月3日之前没有复职，此次解雇将自动转化为带有偏见的解雇。民事案件终止。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/14/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Intersport Corp. as to the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A
译文：Intersport Corp.对修订后的附表A中确定的被告自愿解雇的通知
|
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月20日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 12/30/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in prior orders 19, 26, it may do so by 1/15/25. If Plaintiff declines to amend, the Court will dismiss this case. Mailed notice.
译文：向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）提交的投诉：如果原告能够根据规则11下的义务提出修改后的投诉，以解决先前第19、26号命令中指出的缺陷，则可以在1/15/25之前这样做。如果原告拒绝修改，法院将驳回此案。邮寄通知。
|
| 12/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which seeks to sue 19 separate defendants for trademark infringement 20, 21. But, as before, the allegations remain conclusory and fail to support the joinder of the identified defendants in this single suit. Additionally, Plaintiff's allegations show that the infringing products appear to be intended for a use that remains inconsistent with the use claimed in the registration. For these reasons, the Court again dismisses the complaint 20 and denies Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery 22. The 12/18/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken. Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）面前的起诉书：原告已提交修改后的起诉书，试图起诉19名独立被告商标侵权20、21。但与以前一样，这些指控仍然是结论性的，无法支持将已确定的被告合并在这起单一诉讼中。此外，原告的指控显示，侵权产品的用途似乎与注册中声称的用途不一致。出于这些原因，法院再次驳回申诉20并驳回原告的快速发现动议22。24年12月18日动议通知日期已被删除。邮寄通知
|
| 12/09/2024 | DECLARATION of Keith A. Vogt regarding memorandum in support of motion[23]
译文：基思·A的声明沃格特关于支持动议的备忘录[23]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1-2 |
| 12/09/2024 | Presentment for Exparte Motion [22] NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/18/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：单独动议的陈述[22]动议通知，作者：Keith A。Vogt于2024年12月18日上午11：00向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）发表演讲。
|
| 12/09/2024 | MEMORANDUM in Support of [22] Exparte Motion
译文：支持[22]单独动议的备忘录
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 12/09/2024 | Amended Schedule A to Complaint [1], Schedule A [2], and Amended Complaint [20] by Intersport Corp.
译文：Intersport Corp.修改了投诉附件A [1]、附件A [2]和修改后的投诉[20]
|
| 12/09/2024 | AMENDED complaint by Intersport Corp. against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：Intersport Corp.对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会的修改投诉
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 11/19/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this lawsuit, Plaintiff seeks to sue 203 separate defendants for trademark infringement, see 1, 2. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single trademark infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). In this regard, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them, and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." 1 7, 11. The Court finds the allegations concerning commonalities in Defendants' websites and stores to be conclusory; indeed, it is equally possible that each online retailer set up shop in the same or similar manner. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 188-89 (N.D. Ill. 2020). Plaintiff also alleges, upon information and belief, that Defendants "are an interrelated group of counterfeiters working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell counterfeit products," and that the counterfeit products "for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the counterfeit products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated." Id. 20, 23. But the screenshot evidence Plaintiff submitted belies the allegation, see 15 ; although some of the identified stores do appear to show the same photos, others do not. Nor does the screenshot evidence demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of the infringement claim; in fact, the registration attached to the complaint suggests a use inconsistent with the uses claimed by many of the allegedly infringing products. For these reasons, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint 1 for improper joinder and denies the pending motions for leave to file excess pages 12 and motion for injunctive relief 13. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 11. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of numerous Defendants in this single action, it may do so by 12/9/24. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also address in its allegations the issue of personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant, see 1 12 (alleging personal jurisdiction based upon Defendants' offering to sell and ship infringing products into this judicial district). The mere maintenance of a website accessible in Illinois remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Finally, the Court reminds Plaintiff that all motions must be noticed for presentment. Mailed notice
译文：在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前的分钟记录：在这起诉讼中，原告试图就商标侵权起诉203名单独的被告，见1，2。只有当针对被告的索赔是针对或引起于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件，并且对于所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时，多个被告在单一商标侵权诉讼中合并仍然是合适的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。在这方面，原告声称，被告“共享唯一的识别符，如提供销售的未经授权产品的设计元素和相似性，建立了它们之间的逻辑关系，并暗示被告的非法业务源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”。1 7、11.法院认为关于被告网站和商店的共性的指控是确凿的；事实上，每个在线零售商以相同或类似的方式开设商店的可能性都是平等的。例如，参见雅诗兰黛·科斯姆斯。有限公司诉合伙企业及非法人团体，载于附表A《联邦判例汇编》第334卷第182、188-89页(N.D.IL.2020)。原告还声称，根据信息和信念，被告“是一群相互关联的造假者，他们协同行动，明知并故意制造、进口、分销、提供销售和销售假冒产品”，被告“在网上商店销售的假冒产品具有相似性和相互关联的标志，表明假冒产品是由共同来源制造和来自同一来源，根据信息和信念，被告是相互关联的。”身份证。20，23。但原告提交的屏幕截图证据与指控不符，见15；尽管一些被确认的商店似乎展示了相同的照片，但其他商店并非如此。截图证据也没有证明侵权索赔的可取之处；事实上，诉状所附的登记表明，其用途与许多被指控的侵权产品所声称的用途不符。出于这些原因，法院驳回了原告关于不当合并的申诉1，并驳回了关于许可提交剩余12页的待决动议和关于强制令救济的动议13。法院批准了原告关于允许在印章上提交文件的动议。如果原告可以按照规则11的义务，修改其申诉，以声称事实支持在这一单一诉讼中将多名被告合并，它可能会在12/9/24年前这样做。如果原告不遵守，法院将驳回此案。如果原告选择修改其诉状，它还应在其指控中涉及对每一被告的人身管辖权问题，见112(指称人身管辖权的依据是被告向本司法管辖区销售和运输侵权产品的提议)。仅仅维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的网站仍然不足以授予个人管辖权。见，例如，am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n，Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案，《联邦判例汇编》，第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权)；高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball，Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷，第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”)；Rubik‘s Brand，Ltd.诉附表A，No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668，at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示，伊利诺伊州人可以下单，“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”，“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)最后，最高法院提醒原告，所有动议都必须在提交时予以注意。邮寄通知
|
| 11/07/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料
|
| 11/07/2024 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
|
| 11/07/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable John Robert Blakey for all further proceedings pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 294(b). Mailed notice (ags) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2024: # 1 Exhibit Request for reassignment).
译文：提交执行委员会审议：根据USC 28 294（b）的规定，案件重新分配给尊敬的John Robert Blakey进行所有进一步诉讼。邮寄通知（ags）（2024年7月11日添加了额外附件：# 1附件重新分配请求）。
|
| 11/06/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Kurt Rios regarding memorandum in support of motion, [14]
译文：原告Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O密封证据2，Kurt Rios关于支持动议的备忘录的声明，[14]
|
| 11/06/2024 | MEMORANDUM in Support of [13] Exparte Motion
译文：支持[13]单独动议的备忘录
附件： 1:Exhibit 1, of Kurt Rios' Declaration 2:Declaration of Kurt Rios 3:Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration 4:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 11/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O for leave to file excess pages
译文：原告Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O提出请求提交多余页面的动议
|
| 11/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O for leave to file under seal
译文：原告Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O提出的允许盖章提交的动议
|
| 11/06/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 11/06/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的Joan H.莱夫科。被指定为治安法官凯里·L.霍莱布·霍塔林。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Yi Bu
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O by Yi Bu
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Yanling Jiang
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O，Jiyan ling
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Monica Rita Martin
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O作者：Monica Rita Martin
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Christopher Romero
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O作者：Christopher Romero
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O作者：Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Adam Grodman
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O作者：Adam Grodman
|
| 11/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Keith A. Vogt
译文：原告Intersport Corp.律师出庭d/b/a Wham-O作者：Keith A.沃格特
|
| 11/06/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 11/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O Schedule A to Complaint [1]
译文：原告Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O投诉附表A [1]
|
| 11/06/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22698177.
译文：投诉由Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O提交;提交费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22698177。
附件： 1:Exhibit 4 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit 2 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
