2025-cv-08186 AI分析
08/26/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the voluntary dismissal 36 the clerk is directed to close the case. Civil case closed. Mailed notice. 翻译
08/26/2025
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. as to Defendants bibigg and the Individuals and Entities Operating bibigg 翻译
08/05/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Assuming no defendant appears beforehand, plaintiff is directed to file a motion for entry of default and default judgment by August 28, 2025. Mailed notice. 翻译
08/04/2025
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. as to bibigg and the Individuals and Entities Operating bibigg on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025. 翻译
附件：
1:Declaration of Madeline B. Halgren
2:(Exhibit A)
07/28/2025
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 翻译
07/28/2025
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) bibigg and the Individuals and Entities Operating bibigg by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. 翻译
07/24/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for expedited discovery and electronic service of process 29 is granted. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice. 翻译
07/23/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. for discovery Expedited 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
07/23/2025
EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint, [27] 翻译
07/23/2025
AMENDED complaint by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. against bibigg and the Individuals and Entities Operating bibigg and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 2
07/22/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for a TRO [16] is denied. The court is not persuaded that an asset restraint is necessary to conduct an accounting; discovery and records of sales can provide any accounting plaintiff may be entitled to. Plaintiffs in Schedule A cases rarely pursue an actual accounting as a remedy and rarely justify requests for statutory damages by reference to actual sales figures, lost profits, or the like. Instead, counsel typically asks for an amount of statutory damages based on notions of deterrence without case-specific factual support justifying the number. Upon filing its amended complaint, Plaintiff may submit a proposed TRO that enjoins the named Defendant from using or selling the allegedly infringing works on an ex parte basis if it wishes, but an asset restraint is not necessary here. Mailed notice. 翻译
07/22/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder [Dkt. [14]] and determines, within its discretion, that it has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of more than 40 defendants is proper in this matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Plaintiff argues that joinder is necessary to combat online counterfeiters and make their infringement unprofitable, and that the joinder of dozens of defendants in one action is one of the few available mechanisms for effectively combatting internet counterfeiters. The court is not persuaded that any one defendant's infringement is linked to the next defendant's infringement sufficient to show they are part of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences as required by Rule 20. Even if the court were mistaken in its joinder analysis, it exercises its discretion to not permit joinder in this case. See Dorsey v. Varga, 55 F.4th 1094, 110204 (7th Cir. 2022). Joining this many defendants in one case simply will not promote judicial economy. See Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189 ("[P]resenting dozens or hundreds of defendants in one lawsuit actually undermines judicial economy, because this Court must evaluate the evidence submitted in support of liability and, eventually, damages. That is especially true in the ex parte setting of a temporary restraining order, as well as for default-judgment motions."); Art Ask Agency, 2021 WL 5493226, at *3 (rejecting joinder of 216 defendants, noting that "joinder in this case may yield significant financial benefits to [the plaintiff] at the judiciary's expense.") Nor is the court persuaded by Plaintiff's arguments concerning an increase in the number of case filings, which is not a proper basis to overlook joinder issues. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint consistent with this order along with an amended Schedule A by no later than July 28, 2025. A revised electronic service of process order should also be submitted by July 28, 2025. Mailed notice. 翻译
07/21/2025
MEMORANDUM by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[21] 翻译
07/21/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) 翻译
07/21/2025
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[19] 翻译
07/21/2025
DECLARATION of Kia Holifield Wimmer regarding memorandum in support of motion[17] 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
07/21/2025
MEMORANDUM by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[16] 翻译
07/21/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery 翻译
07/21/2025
MEMORANDUM order on motion for leave to file, set deadlines, [13] by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. Establishing that Joinder is Proper 翻译
07/18/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court grants the motion to seal [3], but upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining nearly 45 defendants in a single action. By July 23, 2025, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by July 23, 2025 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice. 翻译
07/17/2025
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译
07/17/2025
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
07/17/2025
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint 1 翻译
07/17/2025
COMPLAINT filed by Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23765740. 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
