最近更新：2025-02-26
2024-cv-07871 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 11/04/2024 | ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice
译文：已输入判决邮寄通知
|
| 11/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: All matters in dispute now having been resolved, this case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice
译文：在尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前简短发言：所有争议事项现已解决，此案已结案。民事案件终止。邮寄通知
|
| 10/30/2024 | STATUS Report by Bug Art Limited
译文：Bug Art Limited的状态报告
|
| 10/29/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the notice of voluntary dismissal 45 this case is dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(a) as to the following Defendants: helloladies (No. 1); NOVEBERSNO (No. 2); HI MISS (No. 4); and Yundily (No. 3). Absent reinstatement by 12/31/24, this dismissal as to these Defendants shall automatically convert to a dismissal with prejudice. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前的简短发言：根据自愿驳回通知45的提交，本案根据规则41（a）被驳回，不影响以下被告：你好女士（1号）；《新星》（第2期）；嗨，小姐（第4位）；尤迪莉（第三名）。如果不能在24年12月31日前复职，对这些被告的解雇应自动转换为有偏见的解雇。邮寄通知。
|
| 10/29/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [certain] defendants
译文：所有原告自愿解雇[某些]被告的通知
|
| 10/25/2024 | NEW PARTIES: helloladies, NOVEBERSNO and HI MISS added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：新的参与者：女士们好，NOVEBERSNO和HI MISS添加到案例标题中。终止附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人团体
|
| 10/25/2024 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/25/2024. Mailed notice
译文：约翰·罗伯特·布莱基阁下于2024年10月25日签署的初步禁令。邮寄通知
|
| 10/25/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 10/25/24. Defendant #3 present in court via defense counsel. As discussed in court and based upon the same findings made in this Court's TRO 30, this Court finds that a preliminary injunction is appropriate and warranted and thus grants Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 32. Enter Preliminary Injunction Order. The Court directs the Clerk to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff shall file an updated status report by 11/29/24 and shall add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the Court's docket within three business days of this order. Plaintiff may find instructions at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. Mailed notice
译文：请在尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前稍作发言：动议听证会于10/25/24举行。被告#3通过辩护律师出庭。正如在法庭上讨论的那样，根据本法院TRO 30中的相同调查结果，本法院认为初步禁令是适当和有正当理由的，因此批准了原告的初步禁令动议32。输入初步禁令。法院指示书记官启封此前就此事密封的任何文件。原告应在24年11月29日前提交一份更新的状态报告，并应在本命令发出后的三个工作日内将附表A中列出的所有被告添加到法院的备审案件中。原告可以在以下网址找到指示https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf.邮寄通知
|
| 10/25/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Yundily by David Randolph Bennett
译文：David Randolph Bennett为被告Yundily出庭
|
| 10/10/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Yundily by Steven G Kalberg
译文：Steven G.Kalberg为被告Yundily出庭
|
| 10/10/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion 38 to extend the temporary restraining order entered 10/01/2024 29. The Court finds that good cause exists to extend the temporary restraining order, and the order is hereby extended an additional fourteen days, to 10/29/24. The 10/16/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken. Mailed notice
译文：在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前简短发言：法院批准原告的动议38，延长2024年10月1日29日发布的临时限制令。法院认为，有充分理由延长临时限制令，特此将该命令再延长十四天，至10/29/24。动议通知日期为10/16/24。邮寄通知
|
| 10/08/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited for extension of time for the Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告Bug Art Limited关于延长临时限制令期限的动议
|
| 10/08/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited for preliminary injunction
译文：原告Bug Art Limited提出的初步禁令动议
|
| 10/02/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：就附表A所列的合伙企业和非法人团体向被告发布的摘要
|
| 10/01/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint and now seeks to sue four Defendants in this single action. See 21, 22. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the Defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all Defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). In this regard, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." 1, paragraphs 7, 10, 14. Plaintiff also alleges that the "Infringing Products for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the Infringing Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated." Id., paragraph 31. The screenshot evidence submitted in support of Plaintiff's TRO motion confirms these allegations, see [27-1], and the Court thus finds that the record supports the joinder of all four Defendants in this single suit. Plaintiff's amended allegations also support the exercise of personal jurisdiction over Defendants, see 21, paragraph 15 ("each defendant has offered to sell and has shipped one or more infringing products into this judicial district."). Plaintiff may proceed on the amended complaint 21, and, based upon the record, the Court grants Plaintiff's renewed motions for leave to file under seal 23 and to file excess pages 24. The Court also grants Plaintiff's renewed ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order 25. Enter Sealed. Order. Absent further order, this TRO will expire 10/15/24. The 10/2/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken. Mailed notice
译文：在尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）面前简短发言：原告已提交了一份修改后的起诉书，现在试图在这一诉讼中起诉四名被告。见21、22。只有当针对被告的索赔是“就同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”提出的，并且所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时，在一次侵权诉讼中合并多名被告才是合适的。联邦民事法院。第20（a）（2）（a）-（B）页。在这方面，原告声称，被告“共享唯一标识符，如设计元素和未经授权的销售产品的相似性，建立了它们之间的逻辑关系，并表明被告的非法经营是由同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件引起的。”1，第7、10、14段。原告还声称，“在被告互联网商店销售的侵权产品具有相似性和相互关联的迹象，表明侵权产品是由共同来源制造的，据了解和相信，被告是相互关联的。”同上，第31段。为支持原告的TRO动议而提交的截图证据证实了这些指控，见[27-1]，因此法院认定，记录支持将所有四名被告合并审理这一单一诉讼。原告修改后的指控也支持对被告行使属人管辖权，见第21条第15款（“每个被告都提出出售并向该司法区运送了一种或多种侵权产品。”）。原告可以继续处理修改后的诉状21，根据记录，法院批准原告再次提出的动议，允许其加盖印章23并提交多余的第24页。法院还批准了原告重新提出的单方面动议，要求签发临时限制令25。输入“密封”。命令。如果没有进一步的订单，此TRO将于24年10月15日到期。10/2/24动议通知日期被取消。邮寄通知
|
| 09/23/2024 | Presentment for Renewed Exparte Motion 25 and NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages 24, motion for leave to file 23 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/2/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：Keith A.Vogt于2024年10月2日上午11:00在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前提交了《续签外籍人士动议25》和《动议通知》，分别提出了允许提交多余第24页和第23页的动议。
|
| 09/23/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited [Amended] Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jane Crowther regarding memorandum in support of motion, 26
译文：原告Bug Art Limited的密封附件[修订]密封附件2，Jane Crowther关于支持动议的备忘录的声明，26
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2) |
| 09/23/2024 | MEMORANDUM in Support of 25 Renewed Exparte Motion
译文：支持25项新的外籍人士动议的备忘录
附件： 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration 3:Declaration of Jane Crowther 4:(Exhibit 1, of Jane Crowther's Declaration) |
| 09/23/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited for leave to file excess pages [RENEWED]
译文：原告Bug Art Limited要求允许提交多余页面的动议[续期]
|
| 09/23/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited for leave to file under seal [RENEWED]
译文：原告Bug Art Limited要求允许盖章备案的动议[续期]
|
| 09/23/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited Second Amended Schedule A 2 13 to Amended Complaint 21
译文：原告Bug Art Limited盖章文件第二次修订后的起诉书21附表A 2 13
|
| 09/23/2024 | AMENDED complaint by Bug Art Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：Bug Art Limited对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人团体的修订投诉
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
| 09/17/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this case, Plaintiff seeks to sue 32 defendants for infringement of 39 copyrights, see 1, 13. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single copyright infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). Although Plaintiff does not specifically reference joinder, the complaint alleges that the defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." 1 7, 10, 14. Plaintiff alleges, upon information and belief, that Defendants "are an interrelated group of infringers working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Infringing Products," id. 28, and that the "Infringing Products for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the Infringing Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated." Id. 31. These are legal conclusions, which the Court need not accept. More importantly, Plaintiff's screenshot evidence belies the allegations. The evidence shows a variety of products, not a single product; and although some of the defendants' stores feature the same or similar products and photos, that is not true of all of the defendant stores. Rather, the evidence shows different products and arrangements, undermining Plaintiff's allegations concerning relatedness. As a result, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to support the joinder of all 32 Defendants in this single action, and the Court thus dismisses the complaint 1, denies the pending motions 14, 15, 16, and strikes the 9/18/24 Notice of Motion date. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of all Defendants in this single action, it may do so by 10/4/24. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also ensure that its allegations support the exercise of personal jurisdiction over each Defendant; allegations concerning the mere maintenance of a website accessible in Illinois remain insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction). Mailed notice
译文：在尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前简短发言：在本案中，原告试图起诉32名被告侵犯39项版权，见1、13。只有当针对被告的索赔是“就同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件提出的”，并且所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时，在一次版权侵权诉讼中合并多名被告才是合适的。联邦民事法院。第20（a）（2）（a）-（B）页。尽管原告没有具体提及合并审理，但起诉书指控被告“共享唯一标识符，如设计元素和未经授权的销售产品的相似性，在它们之间建立了逻辑关系，并表明被告的非法经营是由同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件引起的。”17、10、14。原告声称，根据所掌握的信息和信念，被告“是一个相互关联的侵权者群体，他们积极合作，故意制造、进口、分销、要约销售和销售侵权产品”，同上28，并且“在被告互联网商店销售的侵权产品具有相似性和相互关联的迹象，表明侵权产品是由共同来源制造和来源的，根据所了解的信息和信仰，被告是相互关联的。”同上31。这些是法律结论，法院不需要接受。更重要的是，原告的截图证据与指控不符。证据表明，产品种类繁多，而不是单一产品；尽管一些被告商店的产品和照片相同或相似，但并非所有被告商店都是如此。相反，证据显示了不同的产品和安排，削弱了原告关于相关性的指控。因此，法院认定，原告未能支持将所有32名被告合并审理这一单一诉讼，因此法院驳回了申诉1，驳回了未决动议14、15、16，并取消了24年9月18日的动议通知日期。如果原告能够根据第11条规定的义务修改其诉状，以指控事实支持将所有被告合并审理这一单一诉讼，则可以在10/4/24之前这样做。如果原告不遵守，法院将驳回此案。如果原告选择修改其诉状，还应确保其指控支持对每个被告行使属人管辖权；关于仅维护伊利诺伊州可访问网站的指控仍不足以授予属人管辖权。例如，参见《美国新娘舞会》。Ass'n，股份有限公司诉附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，192 F.Supp.3d 924，93435（伊利诺伊州n.D.2016）（仅通过互动网站声称存在假冒行为本身不足以授予属人管辖权）。邮寄通知
|
| 09/06/2024 | Presentment for Exparte Motion 16 and NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for leave to file 14, motion for leave to file excess pages 15 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 9/18/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：Keith A.Vogt于2024年9月18日上午11:00在John Robert Blakey阁下面前提交了《外籍人士动议16》和《动议通知》，以提出允许提交第14页的动议和允许提交多余第15页的动议。
|
| 09/06/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jane Crowther regarding memorandum in support of motion, 17
译文：原告Bug Art Limited的密封展品密封展品2，Jane Crowther关于支持动议的备忘录的声明，17
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2) |
| 09/06/2024 | MEMORANDUM in Support of 16 Exparte Motion
译文：支持16项外籍动议的备忘录
附件： 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration 3:Declaration of Jane Crowther 4:(Exhibit 1, of Jane Crowther's Declaration) |
| 09/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited for leave to file excess pages
译文：原告Bug Art Limited要求允许提交多余页面的动议
|
| 09/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited for leave to file under seal
译文：原告Bug Art Limited要求允许盖章备案的动议
|
| 09/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited [Amended] Schedule A to Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2
译文：原告Bug Art Limited盖章文件[修订]诉状1附表A和附表A2
|
| 08/30/2024 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC
译文：MAILED向华盛顿特区注册商提交版权报告
|
| 08/29/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：书记员通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），本法院的美国治安法官可以主持本次民事诉讼的所有程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼，包括审判、最终判决的输入和所有审判后的诉讼，各方必须在随附的同意书上签字。只有各方签署后，此同意书才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意地方法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 08/29/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文：案件移交给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基。任命杰弗里·科尔阁下为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民用类别3）。
|
| 08/29/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Bug Art Limited
译文：Bug Art Limited根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Christopher Romero
译文：克里斯托弗·罗梅罗为原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Monica Rita Martin
译文：莫妮卡·里塔·马丁为原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
译文：Cameron Eugene Mcintyre为原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Adam Grodman
译文：Adam Grodman为原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Yi Bu
译文：易步律师代表原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Yanling Jiang
译文：蒋艳玲律师代表原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bug Art Limited by Keith A. Vogt
译文：Keith A.Vogt为原告Bug Art Limited出庭
|
| 08/29/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：土建封面
|
| 08/29/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Bug Art Limited Schedule A to Complaint 1
译文：原告Bug Art Limited的密封文件，投诉1附表A
|
| 08/29/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Bug Art Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22418758.
译文：Bug Art Limited提交的投诉；申请费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22418758。
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
