2024-cv-00099 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网站

最近更新:2025-02-20
更新案件

2024-cv-00099 AI分析

Howard Robinson v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

重要时间节点
2024-01-23 :签署临时禁令
2024-01-30 :申请初步禁令
2024-02-22 :申请缺席

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网站 日期:01/03/2024

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网站 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网站 品牌:Howard Robinson版权画

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网站 律所:Keith

起诉文件:点击查看

日期 描述
03/20/2024 MAILED surety bond posted by Plaintiff to plaintiff's counsel Keith Vogt Ltd., 33 West Jackson Boulevard, #2W, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, sent certified, article number 70012510000576817396.
译文:原告向原告律师Keith Vogt Ltd.提交的MASYS保证金,33 West Jackson Boulevard,#2W,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,60604,已发送认证,商品编号70012510000576817396。
03/20/2024 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC
译文:向华盛顿特区注册员提交的MASYS版权报告
03/18/2024 DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2024: Mailed notice.
译文:默认最终判决令:由尊敬的玛莎·M签署Pacold于2024年3月18日:邮寄通知。
03/18/2024 ORDER: No defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment [24]. The motion is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded in the amount of $100,000 per defendant, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of plaintiff's copyrights causes plaintiff irreparable harm in the form of diminished goodwill and brand confidence, damage to plaintiff's reputation, loss of exclusivity, and loss of future sales; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendant has appeared to argue otherwise, thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten thousand dollars ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff's counsel Keith Vogt Ltd., 33 West Jackson Boulevard, #2W, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, via certified mail. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [20] is denied as moot. Enter Default Final Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/18/2024:Mailed notice.
译文:命令:没有被告对原告提出的输入违约和违约判决的动议作出回应[24]。动议已获批准。根据提交的支持临时限制令的证据和要求输入失责和失责判决的动议,以及因失责而承认责任,原告已确定侵权行为是故意的,每名被告应获得10万美元的损害赔偿金,并应发出永久禁令。原告已经证明,侵犯原告著作权给原告造成了不可弥补的损害,其形式包括商誉和品牌信心的下降、原告声誉的损害、独家经营权的丧失和未来销售的损失;金钱损害不足以解决这些损害;永久禁令不会损害公共利益。没有被告似乎提出相反的论点,因此,法院还认定,在艰难的平衡中,支持禁制令。原告提交的1万美元(1万美元)的担保保证金特此释放给原告的律师。法院书记员奉命将先前存放在法院书记员处的担保保证书以挂号邮寄方式退还给原告律师基思·沃格特有限公司,地址为西杰克逊大道33号,2W,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,60604。原告要求初步禁令的动议[20]被驳回,认为这是没有意义的。输入默认的最终判决顺序。终止民事案件。玛莎·M·帕科尔德阁下于2024年3月18日签署:邮寄通知。
03/18/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal [33] and the stipulation of dismissal filed by plaintiff and defendant No. 3 MAYDEAR [34], which seek to voluntarily dismiss several defendants under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal and the stipulation of dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing the listed defendants from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed the amended Schedule A form on the docket [35]. Defendants Liaocheng Lubinghua Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd, xiangchengshiniumishangmaoyouxiangongsi are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Maydear is dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses.
译文:Martha M.Pacold阁下的会议记录:法院已收到原告的自愿解雇通知[33]和原告和被告第3号Maydear提出的解雇规定[34],这些规定寻求根据规则第41(A)(1)条自愿驳回几名被告。但是,第41(A)条并不是驳回诉讼部分当事人而不是全部当事人的适当工具。[参见“泰勒诉布朗”案,载于“联邦判例汇编”第三辑,第787卷,第851,857页(第七巡回法庭)]。2015年)(“规则第41(A)条应仅限于驳回整个诉讼。”)因此,法院将原告的自愿驳回通知和驳回的规定解释为根据规则第15(A)(2)条将所列被告从附表A表格中删除,以请求许可修改诉状的请求,见Taylor[《联邦判例汇编》第3d卷,第787卷,第857-58页],法院批准原告修改诉状。原告已将经修订的附表A表格提交议事录[35]。被告聊城市鲁冰花电子商务有限公司、相城商贸商贸有偿服务有限公司被撤销职务,不存在偏见。被告梅德利被驳回,每一方都承担自己的律师费、费用和开支。
03/15/2024 STATUS Report Pursuant to [32] by Howard Robinson
译文:根据霍华德·罗宾逊[32]的状态报告
03/15/2024 Amended Schedule A [2] by Howard Robinson
译文:霍华德·罗宾逊修订的附表A [2]
03/15/2024 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant no. 3 MAYDEAR
译文:解雇的规定对第三被告MAYDEAR的解雇联合规定
03/15/2024 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to Defendant no. 36 Liaocheng Lubinghua Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. and no. 92 xiangchengshiniumishangmaoyouxiangongsi
译文:所有原告自愿解雇被告36号的通知香城十牛上茂友县公司92号
03/08/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal [41], which seeks to voluntarily dismiss several defendants under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing the listed defendants from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff should file the amended Schedule A form on the docket by 3/15/24. Additionally, the court notes that plaintiff submitted a proposed default judgment order to the court's proposed order inbox, which excludes the defendants plaintiff seeks leave to dismiss [31] and also excludes defendant No. 3, MAYDEAR, an appearing defendant that plaintiff has not sought leave to dismiss. By 3/15/24, plaintiff should also file a status report addressing how plaintiff seeks to proceed against defendant No. 3, MAYDEAR. If plaintiff seeks to proceed to a default judgment against only some of the defendants in this suit, plaintiff's status report must address in detail the propriety of doing so. See Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U.S. 552 (1872); Arwa Chiropractic, P.C. v. Med-Care Diabetic and Medical Supplies, Inc., 961 F.3d 942, 950-952 (7th Cir. 2020); VLM Food Trading Int'l, Inc. v. Illinois Trading Co., 811 F.3d 247, 256 n.6 (7th Cir. 2016); Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co. v. Pate, 819 F.2d 806, 811-12 (7th Cir. 1987); In re Uranium Antitrust Litig., 617 F.2d 1248, 1257-58 (7th Cir. 1980); Krakow Bus. Park v. Locke Lord, LLP, 135 F. Supp. 3d 770, 783 (N.D. Ill. 2015), aff'd sub nom. Domanus v. Locke Lord LLP, 847 F.3d 469 (7th Cir. 2017).
译文:玛莎·M·帕科尔德阁下的会议记录:法院收到了原告的自愿解雇通知[41],其中寻求根据规则第41(A)(1)条自愿驳回几名被告。但是,第41(A)条并不是驳回诉讼部分当事人而不是全部当事人的适当工具。[参见“泰勒诉布朗”案,载于“联邦判例汇编”第三辑,第787卷,第851,857页(第七巡回法庭)]。2015年)(“规则第41(A)条应仅限于驳回整个诉讼。”)因此,法院将原告的自愿驳回通知解释为根据规则第15(A)(2)条将所列被告从附表A表格中删除,将其解释为请求许可修改状书的请求,见Taylor,《联邦判例汇编》第787卷,第3d页,第857-58页,法院批准原告修改状书。原告应在3/15/24年3月15日之前将修订后的附表A表格提交到议事日程上。此外,法院注意到,原告向法院建议的命令收件箱提交了一份拟议的违约判决命令,其中排除了原告寻求许可驳回的被告[31],也排除了被告3号,即原告未寻求许可驳回的出庭被告MAYDEAR。在3/15/24年前,原告还应提交一份状态报告,说明原告如何寻求对第3号被告MAYDEAR进行诉讼。如果原告寻求对本诉讼中的部分被告作出缺席判决,原告的状况报告必须详细说明这样做的合理性。参见《弗罗诉德拉维加》案,载于《美国最高法院判例汇编》第82卷,第552页(1872);《Arwa脊椎疗法》,P.C.诉医疗糖尿病和医疗用品公司[《联邦判例汇编》第3集第961卷,第942、950-952页(第七巡回法庭)]。(见《VLM食品贸易国际公司诉伊利诺伊贸易公司》案,载于《联邦判例汇编》第3集第811卷,第247、256卷,第6条(第七巡回法庭)]。(见《马歇尔与伊尔斯利信托公司诉佩特》,载于《联邦判例汇编》第二辑,第819卷,第806、811-12页(第七巡回法庭)]。见《Re铀矿反托拉斯法》案,载于《联邦判例汇编》第二辑,第617卷,第1248,1257-58页(第七巡回法庭)。1980年);克拉科夫巴士。Park诉Locke Lord,LLP,《联邦判例汇编》第135页补充说明。3D 770,783(北伊利诺伊州2015),见鬼的亚名。[参见“多曼努斯诉洛克勋爵有限责任公司”案,载于“联邦判例汇编”第3集第847卷,第469页(第七巡回法庭)]。2017年)。
03/05/2024 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants
译文:所有原告自愿解雇[某些]被告的通知
03/04/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The motion for extension of time filed by defendants Maydear and BSNTHO-HOME [29] is granted. Defendants should answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by 3/21/24.
译文:在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。Pacold:被告Maydear和BSNTHO-Home提出的延期动议[29]获得批准。被告应在3/21/24之前对原告的投诉作出答复或以其他方式作出答复。
02/29/2024 MOTION by Defendants BSNTHO-HOME, Maydear for extension of time
译文:被告BSNTHO-Home,Maydear提出延长时间的动议
02/29/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Maydear, BSNTHO-HOME by Adam Edward Urbanczyk
译文:被告Maydear律师出庭,BSNTHO-Home作者:Adam Edward Urbanczyk
02/23/2024 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Howard Robinson regarding set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 26
译文:原告Howard Robinson关于设定动议和R & R截止日期/听证会的送达证明,26
02/23/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for default judgment 24. The court will take the motion under advisement and will consider it unopposed if defendants do not appear and object by 3/4/2024. Plaintiff shall promptly serve defendants with this notice and file a certificate of service on the docket.
译文:在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德:法院已收到原告缺席判决24的动议。法院将在和解的情况下处理该动议,如果被告不在2024年4月3日之前出庭并反对,法院将认为该动议没有遭到反对。原告应立即向被告送达本通知,并在案卷上提交送达证明。
02/22/2024 MEMORANDUM by Howard Robinson in support of motion for default judgment 24
译文:霍华德·罗宾逊支持缺席判决动议的备忘录24

附件:
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:(Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)
02/22/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Howard Robinson for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A
译文:原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)就原告提出的违约动议和针对第一修正案附表A中确定的被告的违约判决提出的缺席判决动议
02/21/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction 20. The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 20 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 2/28/2024. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice.
译文:在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德:法院已收到原告提出的实施初步禁令的动议20。法院已根据和解提出第20号初步禁令动议,如果在2024年2月28日之前没有被告出庭并提出反对,法院将认为该动议未受到反对。原告应向被告送达本通知。
01/30/2024 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Howard Robinson as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 1/30/2024, answer due 2/20/2024.
译文:霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)于2024年1月30日就附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会返回传票,答复截止日期为2024年2月20日。

附件:
1:(Declaration of Service, Keith A. Vogt)
01/30/2024 MEMORANDUM by Howard Robinson in support of motion for preliminary injunction 20
译文:霍华德·罗宾逊支持初步禁令动议的备忘录20

附件:
1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt
2:(Exhibit 1, Declaration of Keith Vogt)
01/30/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Howard Robinson for preliminary injunction
译文:原告霍华德·罗宾逊提出初步禁令动议
01/26/2024 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Howard Robinson (Document not scanned.)
译文:Howard Robinson发布的金额为10,000美元的保证金(文件未扫描。)
01/23/2024 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文:针对被告发出传票附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
01/23/2024 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/23/2024:
译文:尊敬的玛莎·M签署的密封临时限制令2024年1月23日帕卡德:
01/23/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in the motions 11, 12, 13 filed by plaintiff Howard Robinson, the supporting memorandum 14, and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file certain documents under seal 11, for leave to file excess pages 12, and for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process 13 are granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and the offering of products for sale into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this district have noted, there may be reason to question the propriety of the joinder of all defendants in this one action, but at this preliminary stage, plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Clerk of Court ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), either cash or surety bond, as security.
译文:向Martha M.Pacold阁下提交的会议记录:基于原告Howard Robinson提出的11、12、13号动议、支持备忘录14和临时限制令中所述的理由,批准了原告关于允许将某些文件加盖印章11存档、允许提交超过12页的文件以及请求临时限制令的动议,其中包括临时禁令、临时资产限制、快速发现和第13程序的电子送达。原告的文件支持(暂时)单方面诉讼。具体地说,如果在TRO发布之前告知被告这一程序,很可能会对资产和网站进行重定向,从而破坏原告在识别被告、阻止被告的侵权行为和获取会计信息方面的利益。此外,原告提交的证据显示,根据案情(包括主动侵权和向伊利诺伊州出售产品的证据)胜诉的可能性很大,对原告的伤害是不可弥补的,禁令符合公共利益。诉讼程序的电子送达不违反任何条约,并符合正当程序,因为它有效地将这一诉讼的悬而未决传达给被告。正如这一地区的其他法官所指出的那样,可能有理由质疑所有被告在这一诉讼中合并的适当性,但在这个初步阶段,原告已经提供了足够的证据表明协调一致的活动,以证明对所有被告要求的救济是合理的。有必要加快发现,以确定被告和实施资产冻结。如果任何被告出庭并提出异议,法院将重新审查资产冻结和合并。原告应向法院书记员存放一万美元($10,000.00)现金或担保保证金,作为担保。
01/14/2024 MAILED Copyrights report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文:MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的版权报告

附件:
1:((List of Copyrights))
01/05/2024 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Howard Robinson Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Howard Robinson regarding memorandum in support of motion, 14
译文:原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)密封的附件2,霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)关于支持动议的备忘录的声明,14

附件:
1:(Exhibit 2-1)
01/05/2024 MEMORANDUM in support of 13 Exparte motion
译文:支持13单党派动议的备忘录

附件:
1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt
2:Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration
3:Declaration of Howard Robinson
4:(Exhibit 1, of Howard Robinson's declaration)
01/05/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Howard Robinson for leave to file excess pages
译文:原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)请求允许提交多余页面的动议
01/05/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Howard Robinson for leave to file under seal
译文:原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)要求密封提交的动议
01/04/2024 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文:秘书通知:根据当地规则73.1(b),该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序,包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序,各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权,包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
01/04/2024 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文:案件分配给尊敬的玛莎·M。帕尔德。被指定为治安法官苏尼尔·R。哈贾尼。案例分配:随机分配。(民事类别3)。
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Christopher Romero
译文:克里斯托弗·罗梅罗为原告霍华德·罗宾逊出庭
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Monica Rita Martin
译文:莫妮卡·丽塔·马丁为原告霍华德·罗宾逊出庭
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
译文:卡梅伦·尤金·麦金泰尔(Cameron Eugene Mcintyre)为原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)出庭
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Adam Grodman
译文:亚当·格罗德曼(Adam Grodman)为原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)出庭
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Yi Bu
译文:易布为原告霍华德·罗宾逊出庭
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Yanling Jiang
译文:姜艳玲为原告霍华德·罗宾逊出庭律师
01/03/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Robinson by Keith A. Vogt
译文:基思·A·原告霍华德·罗宾逊(Howard Robinson)出庭律师沃格特
01/03/2024 CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文:公民封面
01/03/2024 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Howard Robinson Schedule A to Complaint 1
译文:原告Howard Robinson的密封文件投诉1的附表A
01/03/2024 COMPLAINT filed by Howard Robinson; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21485683.
译文:投诉由Howard Robinson提交;备案费405美元,收据编号AILNDC-21485683。

附件:
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:(Exhibit 4)

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090