2021-cv-01380 AI分析
03/27/2023
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/27/2023: Defendant GIDIBII Official Store's motion to vacate default judgment and to dismiss (Dkt. 66) is denied. Nonparty Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd.'s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 77) is denied. See accompanying Statement for details. Mailed notice 翻译
11/08/2022
CERTIFIED copy of order dated 11/8/2022 from the 7th Circuit regarding notice of appeal 76 ; Appellate case no. 22-2956: Upon consideration of the JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM AND MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, filed on November 7, 2022, by counsel for the appellant, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). 翻译
11/08/2022
MANDATE of USCA dated 11/8/2022 regarding notice of appeal 76 ; USCA No.22-2956 ; No record to be returned. 翻译
11/02/2022
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Respondent Alipay's motion 77 for reconsideration of a portion of the Court's order 74 discussing nonparty standing in Schedule A cases. On the same day as Alipay filed its motion 77 for reconsideration, Alipay also filed a notice 76 of appeal regarding the same order 74. Without considering whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over Alipay's appeal (a determination to be made by that court), the law is clear that, "[f]or the most part, the filing of a notice of appeal shifts jurisdiction from the district court to the court of appeals." United States v. Burton, 543 F.3d 950, 952 (7th Cir. 2008). As the Supreme Court of the United States has explained, a "federal district court and a federal court of appeals should not attempt to assert jurisdiction over a case simultaneously," and the "filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance: it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal." Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). Although a district court "may address ancillary questions such as costs, the registration of judgments, and motions for certificates of probable cause," Kusay v. United States, 62 F.3d 192, 194 (7th Cir. 1995), the question at issue here (i.e., whether the Court erred in its discussion concerning nonparty standing) does not appear to be ancillary but rather essential to the purported basis of Alipay's appeal before the Seventh Circuit. Moreover, filing the motion 77 for reconsideration simultaneously, or almost simultaneously, with its notice 76 of appeal likely does not save Alipay either. See, e.g., Zuelzke Tool & Eng'g Co., Inc. v. Anderson Die Castings, Inc., 925 F.2d 226, 228 (7th Cir. 1991) (defendant "divested the district court of jurisdiction by filing a simultaneous notice of appeal"). For these reasons, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve Alipay's motion. Alipay is thus directed to show cause via a short, written statement why Alipay's filing of a notice of appeal has not divested this court of jurisdiction. Alipay's statement is due on or before 11/8/2022. Mailed notice 翻译
10/31/2022
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal regarding notice of appeal 76 ; USCA Case No. 22-2956 翻译
10/31/2022
TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal 76. Notified counsel 翻译
10/28/2022
MOTION by Respondent Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd. for reconsideration regarding order on motion to compel, 74 翻译
10/28/2022
NOTICE of appeal by Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd. regarding orders 74 Filing fee $ 505, receipt number AILNDC-19993207. Receipt number: n 翻译
09/29/2022
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/29/2022: Plaintiff KTM AG's motion (Dkt. 48) to compel nonparty Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd. (Alipay) to comply with the Court's final judgment order (Dkt. 46) is dismissed as moot. See accompanying Statement for details. Mailed notice 翻译
06/01/2022
REPLY by GIDIBII Official Store to Response 69 (Defendant No. 42's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and to Vacate Default Judgment) 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit C)
2:Exhibit B
3:Exhibit A
05/18/2022
RESPONSE by Plaintiff KTM AG Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Vacate Default Judgment 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit C)
2:Exhibit B
3:Exhibit A
04/20/2022
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendant's motion to dismiss and vacate default judgment 66 : Plaintiff must respond on or before 5/18/2022 and Defendant GIDIBII Official Store must reply on or before6/1/2022. Within one week of filing, each side must provide two paper courtesy copies of their respective briefs to chambers via U.S. Mail or reliable commercial delivery service. Mailed notice 翻译
04/15/2022
MOTION by Defendant GIDIBII Official Store to dismiss, MOTION by Defendant GIDIBII Official Store to vacate default judgment 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit B)
2:Exhibit A
04/04/2022
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for extension of time to file reply 61 is granted. Plaintiff's reply brief in support of its motion to compel 48 must be filed on or before 4/7/2022. Mailed notice 翻译
03/31/2022
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG for extension of time Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel 翻译
03/17/2022
RESPONSE by Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG to compel Plaintiff's Motion to Compel for Failure to Comply with Court Order 48 (Corrected) 翻译
附件：
1:(Declaration of Murali Pillai)
2:Declaration of Xingjian Zhao
3:Exhibit C to Schwartz Declaration
4:Exhibit B to Schwartz Declaration
5:Exhibit A to Schwartz Declaration
6:Declaration of Daniel Schwartz
7:Exhibit L
8:Exhibit K
9:Exhibit J
10:Exhibit I
11:Exhibit H
12:Exhibit G
13:Exhibit F
14:Exhibit E
15:Exhibit D
16:Exhibit C
17:Exhibit B
18:Exhibit A
19:Declaration of Qinyu Xiang
03/16/2022
RESPONSE by Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG to compel Plaintiff's Motion to Compel for Failure to Comply with Court Order 48 翻译
附件：
1:(Declaration of Murali Pillai)
2:Declaration of Xingjian Zhao
3:Exhibit C to Schwartz Declaration
4:Exhibit B to Schwartz Declaration
5:Exhibit A to Schwartz Declaration
6:Declaration of Daniel Schwartz
7:Exhibit L
8:Exhibit K
9:Exhibit J
10:Exhibit I
11:Exhibit H
12:Exhibit G
13:Exhibit F
14:Exhibit E
15:Exhibit D
16:Exhibit C
17:Exhibit B
18:Exhibit A
19:Declaration of Qinyu Xiang
03/14/2022
ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd. by Andrew H. Schapiro 翻译
03/14/2022
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is nonparty Alipay's opposed motion 55 for leave to file excess pages in connection with its response to Plaintiff's motion 48 to compel. As a threshold issue, counsel for Alipay has not filed an appearance. Although Local Rule 83.12(a) refers to appearances "on behalf of a party," and Alipay is arguably not a "party" (it can at most be considered a third party), the better course is for any nongovernmental lawyer filing any paper in any case to enter an appearance. Accordingly, counsel for Alipay is directed to file an appearance form (see LR 83.16) on or before 3/18/2022. As to the motion seeking extra pages, Alipay explains that its forthcoming filing "will be Alipay's first opportunity to present any factual or legal discussion in this matter, and the [filing] will also include, among other things, legal and factual discussion of complex issues relating to principles of international comity and personal jurisdiction." Alipay asserts that "five additional pages will be necessary to bring important issues of fact and law to the Court's attention." As other judges have explained, however, "extra pages may not mean stronger argument" and "[a] limitation induces the advocate to write tight prose, which helps his client's cause." Life After Hate, Inc. v. Free Radicals Project, Inc., 334 F.R.D. 413, 414 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (quoting Morgan v. South Bend Community School Corp., 797 F.2d 471, 480-481 (7th Cir. 1986)); see also Quantum, B.V.I. v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., No. 89-cv-7914, 1990 WL 19916, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 1990) ("[I]t is this court's experience that it is very seldom necessary for a memorandum to exceed fifteen pages in order to make all points necessary to the argument of a motion."). Perhaps these decisions echo Churchill's reported admonition that "[i]t is slothful not to compress your thoughts." See Erik Larson, The Splendid and the Vile: A Saga of Churchill, Family, and Defiance During the Blitz (2020). Although none of the issues raised in the motion to which Alipay is responding 48 is overly complex, and Alipay offers few details in its motion as to why deviating from the "ordinary practice" of "[e]nforcing page limits" is warranted, Life After Hate, 334 F.R.D. at 414 (quoting Watts v. Thompson, 116 F.3d 220, 224 (7th Cir. 1997)), there is irony in Plaintiff's opposition to Alipay's motion. In virtually every "Schedule A" case on this Court's docket, including this one (see Dkt. 7), the plaintiff brand owners seek excess pages for their initial filings. Those requests are routinely granted, as it was here (see Dkt. 22). Even more ironically, because of the initial ex parte nature of the typical Schedule A case, defendants, unlike Plaintiff here, typically never get the chance to oppose Schedule A plaintiffs' requests for excess pages. In the interest of fairness, therefore (the proverbial goose and gander come to mind), and giving Alipay the benefit of doubt, Alipay's motion for leave to file excess pages 55 is granted. Mailed notice 翻译
02/15/2022
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: By agreement of the parties, the Court sets the following briefing schedule on Plaintiff's opposed motion to compel 48 : Third-party Alipay must respond on or before 3/16/2022 and Plaintiff must reply on or before 3/31/2022. Within one week of filing, each side must provide two paper courtesy copies of their respective briefs to chambers via U.S. Mail or reliable commercial delivery service. Mailed notice 翻译
02/09/2022
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG to compel Plaintiff's Motion to Compel for Failure to Comply with Court Order 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 3
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 1
4:(Exhibit 4)
10/07/2021
MAILED trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 10/6/2021 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA 翻译
10/06/2021
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 10/6/2021. The ten-thousand-dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by Plaintiff is herebyreleased to counsel of record for Plaintiff, Michael A. Hierl of Hughes Socol Piers Resnick &Dym, Ltd. at Three First National Plaza, 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000, Chicago, IL 60602. Enter separate final judgment order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice 翻译
09/24/2021
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 41 for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be in writing and must be filed on or before 10/4/2021. If no written objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within two business days of its entry on the docket and must file proof of service within three business of service being effected. Mailed notice 翻译
09/21/2021
DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 41 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1)
09/21/2021
MEMORANDUM by KTM AG in support of motion for default judgment 41 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
2:(Exhibit 2)
09/21/2021
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A 翻译
08/20/2021
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by KTM AG Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant No. 40 翻译
06/30/2021
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by KTM AG Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Certain Defendants 翻译
06/03/2021
NEW PARTIES: YOLENSE Modified Club Store, YOUMOTECH Carto Store, Your Car Expert Store, anaheimgate, autumn_hu, bakersfieldgate, bellagate, berlingate, bestdhgatebags, caopa3506, clothes_666, detroitmall, dutchgate, enbabyhomes, fitchburgshop, fresnogate, game9component, gml_lyl1314, goodshopyu, holessboos, hoosyus, jamuesui, jerrychoo, jin331000, Kooldhgateso, linkobd, little_lucky, livia1237, longbeachgate, longchengzheng, lovelyangels, lovelyangels, lxq2018, masksherry, motocycles, mountpleasantmall, okteam, onlyonesun, peabodyshop, sestoreqing, shurre, starstradingco, super_automotor, traversecitymall, usashoeshouse, vipkid, vipsupreme9 and xiamensdhgates added to case caption. 翻译
06/03/2021
NEW PARTIES: NEVERLAND Official Store, NFSEPGO DP Offroad Lights Store, NiceTesla Store, NIEC MOTOR PARTS, Oezrefit Car&Motorcycle Parts Store, OFFGUN Store, Online Car Store, PCR-MOTOR Store, QMP Store, QY Motorcycle Parts Store, Racing Global Store, RacingMotor, RiderGT Store, SAVAGE Motorcyclist Store, SAVAGE Official Store, SCL-MOTOS, Sconan Hard Boiled Store, Shop1501598 Store, Shop3615093 Store, Shop4926003 Store, Shop5038102 Store, Shop5269014 Store, Shop5280016 Store, Shop5592145 Store, Shop5623149 Store, Shop5874107 Store, Shop5882586 Store, Shop910358065 Store, Shop910544384 Store, Shop910715110 Store, Shop910908038 Store, Speedmoto Store, Studyset Car Store, tingxuan01 Store, Tomorrow's Store, V-motor Store, Westworld Store, XP-ALIEXPRESS Store, YEGEXO Motorcycle Accessories Store and Yerbay Store added to case caption. 翻译
06/02/2021
NEW PARTIES: Hi! Car Accessories Store, house of automotive Store, Iapetus 777 Store, Integrity-Light Store, Iycorish Store, Jumping in My Car Store, LUNANANA Store, QIMO ACCESSORIES Store, RYAN-car parts Store, RYAN-PARTS Store, Shaking Your H-E-A-R-T Car Store, shawn-motor Store, Shop3731019 Store, Shop4993505 Store, Shop5747003 Store, Shop5874239 Store, Shop5940202 Store, Shop910324340 Store, Shop910339086 Store, Shop910348381 Store, Shop910350361 Store, WEICHUYI Store, Welcome dropshipping to my Store, Welcome to Maria's A-M-A-Z-I-N-G Car Store, XA-Life Store Store, You and I Car Store, autoellin, caibdhgates, famouscaises, virun1, wanghongmei8888, wangxiaofeng806, xshine, zrigo, Ding Dong Motor Store, Dobestmotor Store, D-PRO Repair Parts Store, DTRAD Store, Froza Horizon Car-moto Accessories Store, Furious_Racing Store, FXMT Store, GIDIBII Official Store, Gremlins Official Store, GYMARK store Store, honglue motorcycle accessries Store, HZX motorracer Store, i-Motos Store, JFG MOTOR Store, JFG Store, JRmoto parts store, Knight spirit, Knight supplies Store, Letgoing Co., Ltd.(CHN.), Limit Racing Co., Ltd, lin 111 Store, Lisa car Store, LPAILH Factory Direct sales Store, MASTERGEAR MOTORSPORT Store, Motor_Knight Store and My Precision Design Parts Store added to case caption. 翻译
06/01/2021
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/1/2021. Mailed notice 翻译
06/01/2021
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 28 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that Plaintiff has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [33, 34] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but, despite the Court having provided 31 the opportunity to do, no Defendant has objected to the motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Mailed notice 翻译
05/21/2021
SUMMONS Returned Executed by KTM AG as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 5/21/2021, answer due 6/11/2021. 翻译
05/21/2021
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto 翻译
05/17/2021
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 28 for entry of a preliminary injunction. Although the memorandum of law 29 Plaintiff has submitted in support of its current motion refers to the electronic service of process the Court authorized previously 22 23, neither the memorandum nor the Declaration submitted by Plaintiff 30 establish that the authorized actions relating to service have in fact been taken. More pertinently, Plaintiff has not, as is commonly done in similar "Schedule A" counterfeiting cases before the filing of a motion seeking a preliminary injunction, filed the proof of service required under Rule 4(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without certification that Plaintiff has provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action, the Court is unwilling to grant further preliminary injunctive relief. Accordingly, the motion for entry of a preliminary injunction is entered and continued. Plaintiff must provide the required proof of service on or before 5/21/2021. If Plaintiff complies with this requirement by the deadline, the Court will proceed to resolve Plaintiff's pending motion. If Plaintiff fails to act by that deadline, the Court will summarily deny the motion for a preliminary injunction and will dissolve the existing Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice 翻译
05/10/2021
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 28 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 5/14/2021." For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the TRO, as well as in Plaintiff's earlier motion 24 to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice 翻译
05/06/2021
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction 翻译
04/29/2021
ORDER TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 4/29/2021. Mailed notice 翻译
04/29/2021
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to extend the temporary restraining order 24 is granted. Enter order. Mailed notice 翻译
04/22/2021
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 翻译
04/13/2021
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 4/13/2021. Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
04/13/2021
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 5, motion for leave to file excess pages 7, and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, electronic service of process, and other relief 8 are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (including the declarations of Michael Hierl, Hubert Trunkenpolz, and Viktor Sigl) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 6 and [10-17]. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order will also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiff's trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As other judges in this District have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. A temporary transfer of domain names is appropriate to prevent infringing conduct. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice 翻译
03/15/2021
MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA 翻译
附件：
1:((List of Trademarks))
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 8 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 7 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration Modified on 6/9/2021. 翻译
03/12/2021
MEMORANDUM by KTM AG in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 8 翻译
附件：
1:Declaration Trunkenpolz/Sigl Declaration
2:Exhibit 1
3:Declaration Hierl Declaration
4:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1
5:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2
6:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3)
03/12/2021
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication 翻译
03/12/2021
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation 翻译
03/12/2021
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. 翻译
03/12/2021
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 翻译
03/12/2021
COMPLAINT filed by KTM AG; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18014669. 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit 1)
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
