2024-cv-04114 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网站

最近更新:2024-12-25
更新案件

2024-cv-04114 AI分析

Laura Annette Zollar v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网站 日期:05/20/2024

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网站 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网站 品牌:Laura 生命之树

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网站 律所:TME

日期 描述
09/17/2024 MAIL RETURNED, for $3,000.00 surety bond sent to Keith Vogt Ltd. Re-mailed surety bond to 33 West Jackson Boulevard, #2W Chicago, Illinois, 60604 via certified mail # 9489 0178 9820 3020 9595 13.
译文:邮寄退回,金额为3,000.00美元的保证金已发送至Keith Vogt Ltd。通过认证邮件将保证金重新邮寄至33 West Jackson Boulevard,#2 W Chicago,Illinois,60604。9489 0178 9820 3020 9595 13。
09/04/2024 MAILED Original $ 3,000.00 Surety Bond Posted by Plaintiff, Laura Annette Zollar, Attorney Keith A. Vogt, Keith Vogt, Ltd. 33 West Jackson Boulevard Unit #2W Chicago, IL 60604, via certified mail # 9589 0710 5270 0579 7798 85.
译文:MASYS原始3,000.00美元担保人邦德发布者:原告Laura Annette Zollar、律师Keith A. Vogt,Keith Vogt,Ltd. 33 West Jackson Boulevard Unit #2W Chicago,IL 60604,通过认证邮件# 9589 0710 5270 0579 7798 85。
09/04/2024 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants
译文:所有原告自愿解雇[某些]被告的通知
08/29/2024 FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 8/29/2024. Mailed notice
译文:尊敬的Sunil R签署的最终默认判决令Harjani于2024年8月29日。邮寄通知
08/29/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 37 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's copyrights irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendant (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $50,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Plaintiff has also certified and established 40 that it provided electronic notice to defendant of the objection deadline, but no objection to the motion for entry of default judgment has been filed on behalf of defendant. Because no default judgment hearing has been requested, the default judgment hearing tentatively set for 9/4/2024 is stricken. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond posted in the amount of three thousand dollar ($3,000) to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's counsel, Keith Vogt Ltd., 33 West Jackson Boulevard, #2W, Chicago, Illinois, 60604. Enter separate Final Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice
译文:尊敬的苏尼尔·R·哈贾尼面前的会议记录:没有剩余的被告对原告要求输入缺席判决的动议做出回应。因此,第37项动议获得批准。根据原告先前提交的证据和对违约责任的承认,原告已确定应实施永久禁令。侵犯原告著作权的行为对原告造成了不可挽回的伤害,也给公众造成了困惑。这种侵权行为是故意的,并判给法定损害赔偿金。在考虑了产品的性质、价格点、没有任何具体证据表明被告损失了利润或大量侵权行为(原告未能要求对利润进行核算)、原告品牌的价值以及阻止容易实施和难以阻止的侵权行为的必要性后,法院得出结论,50,000美元是适当的法定损害赔偿金。原告还证明并证实,它向被告提供了反对截止日期的电子通知,但没有人代表被告对输入缺席判决的动议提出反对。由于没有请求缺席判决听证,暂定于2024年9月4日举行的缺席判决听证会受到打击。法院书记员奉命将金额为3,000美元(3,000美元)的担保保证金退还给原告或原告的律师基思·沃格特有限公司,地址:33 West Jackson Boulevard,#2W,Chicago,Illinois,60604。输入单独的最终违约判决顺序。民事案件终结。邮寄通知
08/21/2024 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar regarding set/reset hearings, 39
译文:原告Laura Annette Zollar关于设定/重置听证会的送达证明,39
08/21/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 37 for entry of default and default judgment against all remaining defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 8/28/2028. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 8/28/2024. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative default judgment hearing is set for 9/4/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice
译文:向尊敬的Sunil R.Harjani提交的会议记录:提交给法院的是原告的第37项动议,要求记录对所有其余被告的缺席和缺席判决。其余所有被告要么没有认罪,要么没有以其他方式出现在对这一诉讼的辩护中。因此,根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第55(A)条输入违约令。任何对登录失责判决动议的反对必须在2028年8月28日或之前提交。如果在该日期之前没有人提出反对,法院将考虑无人反对的动议。除非在2024年8月28日之前要求举行听证会,否则法院还将对这些文件做出裁决。通过电话会议进行的听证,可通过将听证请求作为议程上的一个单独条目提出要求。原告必须在记录在案卷上的一个工作日内将本会议纪要送达所有其余被告,并必须迅速提交该送达的证明。暂定缺席判决听证会定于2024年9月4日上午9点15分举行。邮寄通知
08/20/2024 MEMORANDUM by Laura Annette Zollar in support of motion for default judgment 37
译文:劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)支持缺席判决动议的备忘录37

附件:
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:(Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)
08/20/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar for default judgment as to Against the Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A
译文:原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)提出对第一修正案附表A中确定的被告做出缺席判决的动议
08/04/2024 NEW PARTIES: littleli, DIY.HD and SAVSV added to case caption.
译文:新伙伴:littleli、DIY.HD和SAVSV添加到案例说明中。
08/02/2024 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 8/2/2024. Mailed notice
译文:尊敬的Sunil R签署初步禁令Harjani于2024年2月8日。邮寄通知
08/02/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 30 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [32, 34] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the court's docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Because no preliminary injunction hearing has been requested, the preliminary injunction hearing tentatively set for 8/5/2024 is stricken. Summons was issued on 7/22/2024, and Defendants' responses to the complaint are due by 8/19/2024. Plaintiff should file any motion for entry of default and default judgment by 9/10/2024. If there are any remaining defendants whom default and default judgment are not being sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report identifying each defendant against whom this case is proceeding and state whether the parties anticipate a settlement or further litigation. A telephone status hearing is set for 9/19/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice
译文:尊敬的苏尼尔·R·哈贾尼面前的一分钟:批准原告要求初步禁令的动议30。原告的文件表明,它迅速采取行动保护自己的利益,被告将相关资产转移到法院无法触及的地方的风险仍然很大。由于这些原因,以及原告的全部卷宗中所提供的理由,以及法院就加入临时禁令所作的陈述,法院被说服,原告已经满足了初步禁令的要求。此外,法院认为损害的平衡有利于原告,初步禁令符合公共利益,除其他外,保护消费者免受假冒商品的销售。原告还证明并确立了[32,34],它向被告提供了关于本诉讼和动议待决的电子通知,但没有人代表任何被告对初步禁令动议提出异议。输入初步禁制令。原告律师被指示确保在五个工作日内将附表A上列出的所有被告添加到法院的议程中。秘书被要求解封任何先前密封的文件。由于没有要求举行初步禁令听证会,暂定于2024年8月5日举行的初步禁令听证会遭到破坏。传票于2024年7月22日发出,被告对申诉的答复截止日期为2024年8月19日。原告应在2024年9月10日之前提交任何要求输入违约和违约判决的动议。如果有任何剩余的被告没有寻求违约和违约判决,原告被命令提交一份状况报告,指明本案所针对的每一名被告,并说明双方是否期待达成和解或进一步诉讼。电话状态听证会定于2024年9月19日上午9点15分举行。公众和媒体将能够打电话来收听这次听证会,但将被设置为静音。电话号码是(855)244-8681,访问代码是172 628 1276##。对获准远程观看诉讼程序的人提醒,一般禁止对法庭程序进行摄影、录音和转播。邮寄通知
07/29/2024 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar regarding terminate hearings, set/reset hearings, 33
译文:原告Laura Annette Zollar关于终止听证会、设置/重置听证会的送达证明,33
07/29/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 30 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 8/1/2024." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 8/1/2024. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Telephone status hearing set for 8/5/2024 at 9:15 a.m. is converted to a tentative preliminary injunction hearing. Mailed notice
译文:在尊敬的苏尼尔·R之前报名参赛。哈贾尼:法院面前的是原告要求下达初步禁令的第30号动议。就该动议而言,原告必须向所有被告提供以下声明:“法院已根据和解提出初步禁令动议,如果在2024年8月1日之前没有被告出庭并提出反对,法院将认为该动议未受到反对。“如果到该日期没有人提出异议,法院将认为该动议没有人反对。除非在2024年8月1日之前要求举行听证会,否则法院还将对文件做出裁决。通过电话会议进行的听证会可以通过提交听证请求来请求。原告必须在该命令列入备审名单后的一个工作日内将该命令送达所有被告,并必须立即提交该送达的证明。定于2024年5月8日上午9:15举行的电话状态听证会已改为临时初步禁令听证会。邮寄通知
07/29/2024 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Annette Zollar as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 7/29/2024, answer due 8/19/2024.
译文:劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)于2024年7月29日就附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会返回传票,答复截止日期为2024年8月19日。

附件:
1:(Declaration of Service)
07/29/2024 MEMORANDUM by Laura Annette Zollar in support of motion for preliminary injunction 30
译文:劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)支持初步禁令动议的备忘录30

附件:
1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt
2:(Exhibit 1, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration)
07/29/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar for preliminary injunction
译文:原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉提出初步禁令动议
07/22/2024 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文:针对被告发出传票附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
07/22/2024 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 7/22/2024. Mailed notice
译文:尊敬的Sunil R签署的密封临时限制令Harjani于2024年7月22日。邮寄通知
07/22/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani:Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint 23 as directed. At this preliminary stage and in the absence of adversarial presentation, the Court finds that joinder of three Defendants is proper at this time and this case may now proceed. Moreover, no defendants will be prejudiced by permitting joinder at this juncture. See Bose Corp. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 511, 517 (N.D. Ill. 2020). To the extent any defendant appears and objects to joinder, the Court will revisit the issue and is free to sever certain defendants from the case under Rule 21 at that time. Id. Plaintiff's second renewed ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by email and/or electronic publication 25 is granted. Plaintiff's renewed ex parte motion for temporary restraining order 21 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by defendants' unauthorized use of plaintiff's copyrighted works, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order at 11 a.m. on 7/22/2024. Plaintiff shall file the TRO extension motion (or a preliminary injunction motion) if appropriate no later than 7/29/2024. Telephone status hearing is set for 8/5/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice
译文:苏尼尔·R·哈贾尼阁下面前的会议记录:原告已按指示提交了修改后的起诉书23。在这一初步阶段,在没有对抗性陈述的情况下,法院认为目前三名被告合并是适当的,现在可以继续审理此案。此外,在这个节骨眼上,允许合并不会对任何被告造成损害。见《Bose Corp.诉合伙企业及非法人团体》,载于《联邦判例汇编》第334卷,第511,517页(N.D.伊利诺伊州)。2020)。如果任何被告出庭并反对合并,法院将重新审议这一问题,并可根据第21条自由地将某些被告从案件中分离出来。身份证。批准原告要求临时限制令的第二次单方面更新动议,包括临时禁令、临时资产限制、快速发现和通过电子邮件和/或电子出版物送达法律程序25。原告要求临时限制令的新的单方面动议被驳回,因为这是没有意义的。原告的陈述表明,如果被告在执行原告请求的初步禁令救济之前得知这些程序,被告可能会销毁相关的书面证据,并隐藏或转移法院无法触及的资产,这是一个重大风险。因此,只要在适当的时间开封,原告可以将盖章动议中确定的文件加盖印章。与本会议记录一起登录的临时限制令也应加盖印章。此外,就上述动议而言,目前原告的申请支持单方面进行诉讼。具体地说,如上所述,如果被告在TRO可以发布之前被告知这一程序,法院认为,他们的资产和网站很可能会被重新定向,从而破坏了原告在确定被告、阻止被告的侵权行为和获得账目方面的利益。此外,原告提交的证据表明,根据案情(包括主动侵权和向伊利诺伊州销售的证据),原告受到的伤害是不可弥补的,禁制令符合公共利益。禁制令服务于公共利益,因为被告未经授权使用原告的受版权保护的作品造成了消费者的困惑,而指示被告停止侵权的命令对他们没有抵消的损害。诉讼程序的电子送达不违反任何条约,并符合正当程序,因为它有效地将这一诉讼的悬而未决传达给被告。有必要加快发现,以确定被告和实施资产冻结。上午11点进入密封的临时限制令。2024年7月22日。原告应在2024年7月29日之前提交临时延期动议(或初步禁令动议)。电话状态听证会定于2024年8月5日上午9:15举行。公众和媒体将能够打电话来收听这次听证会,但将被设置为静音。电话号码是(855)244-8681,访问代码是172 628 1276##。对获准远程观看诉讼程序的人提醒,一般禁止对法庭程序进行摄影、录音和转播。邮寄通知
07/19/2024 AMENDED complaint by Laura Annette Zollar against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文:劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会的修改投诉

附件:
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
06/25/2024 MEMORANDUM by Laura Annette Zollar Establishing that Joinder is Proper
译文:劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)的备忘录确立Joinder是正确的

附件:
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
5:Exhibit 5
6:(Exhibit 6)
06/13/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder 17 and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 167 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"); H-D U.S.A. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 780486, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 1, 2021) ("The Seventh Circuit has recognized the broad discretion that district courts have in remedying misjoinder, so long as the court's decision avoids unnecessary harm to the parties."). The Court observes that plaintiff's memorandum includes a fair amount of conclusory language about a logical relationship among all defendants but not much, if any, facts to actually support that relationship. Beyond alleging that the 167 defendants are infringing upon plaintiff's copyrights, plaintiff claims only generally that joinder is proper because, inter alia, defendants use aliases to conceal their identifies, "show evidence of market coordination," share "unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products for sale," and the infringing products "bear similar irregularities and indicia of being related to one another" suggesting that they "were manufactured by and come from a common source." (Doc. 17 at 7; Doc. 1, ¶¶ 7, 10, 14, 31). But plaintiff provides only one conclusory example of shared unique identifiers ("item titles [that] are nearly identical or very similar to one another.") (Doc. 17 at 7-8; Doc. 17-1, ¶ 5) and instead the record contains Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Laura Zollar (which includes 817 pages of screenshots from defendants' listings) without providing the Court with specific additional information from those listings that might in fact support joinder in this matter. See Doc. 14-3, 9; Doc. 15. It is not this Court's job to sift through hundreds of pages of materials to look for a relationship between the defendants. Moreover, "defendants with nearly identical product descriptions may in fact share no ties, with each simply copying the same description from elsewhere." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd., et al. v. The Partnerships, et al., No. 20-cv-00845 (N.D. Ill. June 22, 2020) (Lee, J.) (Doc. 40 at 9); see also Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 188. Within its discretion, on this record, the Court finds that plaintiff has failed to meet its burden to show that joinder is proper here. See Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021) (holding similar conclusory statements do not support joinder); H-D U.S.A., 2021 WL 780486, at *3 (finding joinder improper where plaintiff failed to allege "any nonconclusory facts to form a basis for a conclusion that the defendants' conduct overlaps enough to warrant joinder"). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 13 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 11 and motion to exceed page limitation 12 are granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others by 6/27/2024. Mailed notice
译文:向尊敬的Sunil R.Harjani阁下提交的会议纪要:法院审查了原告关于合并第17条的备忘录,并在其自由裁量权范围内裁定,原告未能履行其责任,证明在FED的管辖下,167名被告合并在这一问题上是适当的。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)。参见雅诗兰黛·科斯姆斯。有限公司诉合伙企业及非法人团体,载于附表A《联邦判例汇编》第334卷第182、185页(N.D.IL.2020年)(注意到“[原告]有责任证明合并是适当的”);H-D U.S.A.诉附表“A”确定的合伙和非法人团体,2021年WL 780486,见*2(N.D.ill.2021年3月1日)(“第七巡回法院已承认地区法院在补救错合案件方面拥有广泛的自由裁量权,只要法院的裁决避免对当事人造成不必要的伤害。”)最高法院注意到,原告的备忘录包含了相当多的关于所有被告之间的逻辑关系的结论语言,但没有多少事实(如果有的话)来实际支持这种关系。除了指控167名被告侵犯了原告的著作权之外,原告仅笼统地声称,合并是正当的,因为除其他外,被告使用化名来掩盖他们的身份,“展示市场协调的证据”,共享“独特的识别符,如设计元素和未经授权的待售产品的相似性”,以及侵权产品“带有类似的违规行为和彼此相关的标记”,表明它们“是由共同的来源制造和来自”。(DOC.17在7点;医生。7、10、14、31)。但原告只提供了共享唯一识别符的一个秘密例子(“物品标题彼此几乎相同或非常相似”)。(DOC.17在7-8;医生。17-1;5),相反,记录中载有《劳拉·佐拉尔宣言》的附件2(其中包括817页的被告名单截图),而没有向法院提供这些名单中可能实际上支持在这一问题上合并的具体补充资料。请参见DOC。14-3、9;DOC.15.本法院的工作不是为了寻找被告之间的关系而筛选数百页的材料。此外,“产品描述几乎相同的被告实际上可能没有任何联系,每个被告都只是从其他地方抄袭相同的描述。”雅诗兰黛·科斯姆斯。有限公司,等人。V.合伙关系,等人,第20-cv-00845号(北达伊尔2020年6月22日)(Lee,J.)(DOC.40在9);另见雅诗兰黛,334 F.R.D.,188。在其自由裁量权范围内,根据这一记录,法院认为原告未能履行其责任,以证明合并在这里是适当的。见ArtAsk Agency诉个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人团体,见附表“A”,2021年WL 5493226,at*2(N.D.2021年11月23日)(持有类似的结论陈述不支持合并);H-D U.S.A.,2021年WL 780486,at*3(在原告未能声称“任何非秘密事实,以形成被告行为重叠足以证明合并的结论”的情况下,认定合并不恰当)。因此,原告要求临时限制令13的动议被驳回,不构成损害。批准原告关于允许在印章上存档的动议11和超过页数限制12的动议。原告获准向较小一部分被告提出修正后的申诉,并附有一份备忘录,具体解释为什么每个被告在2024年6月27日之前与所有其他被告适当地结合在一起。邮寄通知
05/31/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The joinder issue remains under advisement. Telephone status hearing set for 6/6/2024 is stricken. Mailed notice
译文:在尊敬的苏尼尔·R之前报名参赛。哈贾尼:合并诉讼问题仍在讨论中。定于2024年6月6日举行的电话状态听证会已中断。邮寄通知
05/29/2024 MEMORANDUM by Laura Annette Zollar Establishing that Joinder is Proper
译文:劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)的备忘录确立Joinder是正确的

附件:
1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt
2:Exhibit 1
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 3
5:Exhibit 4
6:Exhibit 5
7:Exhibit 6
8:(Exhibit 7)
05/23/2024 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 11, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 13, and plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation 12 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of over 165 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 5/30/2024, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. A telephone status hearing is set for 6/6/2024 at 9:15 a.m.Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice
译文:在尊敬的Sunil R.Harjani面前的分钟记录:原告要求允许在印章上存档的动议11,原告要求临时限制令13的动议,以及原告超过页面限制12的动议被记录并继续。在审查了申诉和临时提交的材料后,法院提出了该案中165多名被告合并的所有权。参见《雅诗兰黛化妆品有限公司诉附表A》,载于《联邦判例汇编》第334卷,第182页(N.D.2020)。在2024年5月30日之前,原告应提交一份补充备忘录,根据雅诗兰黛中描述的原则处理合并的适当性。在另一种情况下,原告有权向较小一部分被告提出修改后的申诉。雅诗兰黛,334 F.R.D.,189号。电话状态听证会定于2024年6月6日上午9:15举行。公众和媒体成员可以拨打电话收听这次听证会,但将被设置为静音。电话号码是(855)244-8681,访问代码是172 628 1276##。对获准远程观看诉讼程序的人提醒,一般禁止对法庭程序进行摄影、录音和转播。邮寄通知
05/20/2024 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Laura Annette Zollar regarding memorandum in support of motion, 14
译文:原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉尔(Laura Annette Zollar)密封的证据2,劳拉·安妮特·佐拉尔(Laura Annette Zollar)关于支持动议的备忘录的声明,14

附件:
1:Exhibit 2-1
2:Exhibit 2-2
3:(Exhibit 2-3)
05/20/2024 MEMORANDUM in support of 13 Exparte motion
译文:支持13单党派动议的备忘录

附件:
1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt
2:Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration
3:Declaration of Laura Annette Zollar
4:(Exhibit 1, of Laura Annette Zollar's declaration)
05/20/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar for leave to file excess pages
译文:原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)请求允许提交多余页面的动议
05/20/2024 MOTION by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar for leave to file under seal
译文:原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)提出的密封申请
05/20/2024 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文:秘书通知:根据当地规则73.1(b),该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序,包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序,各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权,包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
05/20/2024 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jn,)
译文:案件分配给尊敬的Sunil R.哈贾尼。玛丽亚·巴尔德斯阁下被指定为治安法官。案例分配:随机分配。(民事类别3)。(jn,)
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Christopher Romero
译文:克里斯托弗·罗梅罗(Christopher Romero)为原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)出庭
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Monica Rita Martin
译文:莫妮卡·丽塔·马丁(Monica Rita Martin)为原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)出庭
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
译文:卡梅伦·尤金·麦金泰尔(Cameron Eugene Mcintyre)为原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)出庭
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Adam Grodman
译文:亚当·格罗德曼(Adam Grodman)为原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)出庭
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Yi Bu
译文:原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)律师出庭
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Yanling Jiang
译文:姜艳玲为原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉出庭律师
05/20/2024 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar by Keith A. Vogt
译文:基思·A·基思·A·原告劳拉·安妮特·佐拉(Laura Annette Zollar)出庭律师沃格特
05/20/2024 CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文:公民封面
05/20/2024 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Laura Annette Zollar Schedule A to Complaint 1
译文:原告Laura Annette Zollar的密封文件投诉1的附表A
05/20/2024 COMPLAINT filed by Laura Annette Zollar ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21983132.
译文:投诉人:Laura Annette Zollar ;投诉费405美元,收据编号AILNDC-21983132。

附件:
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:(Exhibit 4)

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090