2024-cv-10835 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网站

最近更新:2025-01-19
更新案件

2024-cv-10835 AI分析

H. v. The Individuals, Partnerships, or Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

重要时间节点
2024-10-28 :签署临时禁令
2024-10-29 :驳回匿名

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网站 日期:10/21/2024

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网站 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网站 品牌:Jonna 动物帆布版画

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网站 律所:Sriplaw

起诉文件:点击查看


11/08/2024

MAILED copyright report with certified copy of the minute order dated 11/7/2024 to Registrar, Washington DC.

译文:向华盛顿特区注册官提交版权报告,并附有2024年7月11日的会议记录副本。

11/07/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the notice of voluntary dismissal [17], this case is dismissed without prejudice. Any pending deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice

译文:向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基(John Robert Blakey)提交的临时条目:根据自愿解雇通知的提交[17],本案被驳回,没有偏见。任何悬而未决的截止日期都会被打破。民事案件终止。邮寄通知

11/05/2024

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by J. H.

译文:J.H.自愿解雇通知

10/29/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has initiated a copyright infringement case against an unknown number of Defendants and seeks to proceed, at least initially, via pseudonym. See 1, 5. Plaintiff also seeks leave to temporarily seal its complaint, the unfiled "Schedule A," copies of Plaintiff's intellectual property, and Plaintiff's TRO motion and supporting documents. See 5, 6. "No-name litigation is disfavored in general, and particularly in this Circuit." XYZ Corp. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 21-CV-06471, 2022 WL 180151, at *12 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2022). The Seventh Circuit has "repeatedly voiced its disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate 'exceptional circumstances' that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Id. (citing Doe v. Vill. of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 37677 (7th Cir. 2016); Doe v. Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005); Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis., 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997)). Here, Plaintiff claims exceptional circumstances based upon representations that Chinese counterfeiters monitor litigation activity to sound the alarm about enforcement actions, which frustrates Plaintiff's litigation efforts. But many cases just like this are filed every day in this District without anonymous plaintiffs, and the Court has no reason to think that the requested sealing order (which would prevent Defendants from learning that they have been sued and prevent them from discerning the asserted intellectual property) remains insufficient by itself to alleviate any concerns Plaintiff may have about disclosing its identity. Because Plaintiff has failed to identify itself on any of the pending pleadings, the Court dismisses the complaint 1 without prejudice and denies the motion for leave to proceed under a pseudonym 5. The Court also denies without prejudice the motions for leave to file excess pages 12 and for entry of a TRO 13 and strikes the 10/30/24 Notice of Motion date. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal and the pleadings on file shall remain under seal; Plaintiff also file any amended complaint and revised motions under seal. Plaintiff should ensure that any amended complaint supports the joinder of multiple defendants and that its submissions demonstrate a likelihood of success as to each Defendant on the asserted claims. Plaintiff should also ensure that its submissions support the exercise of personal jurisdiction as to each defendant; in this regard, the mere maintenance of a website, even a fully interactive website accessible in Illinois, remains insufficient. E.g., Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice.

译文:尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前的一分钟:原告对数量不详的被告提起了侵犯版权的诉讼,并寻求至少在一开始通过化名进行诉讼。见1,5.原告还寻求许可暂时封存其诉状、未存档的“附表A”、原告的知识产权复印件以及原告的临时动议和支持文件。请参见5、6。“无名诉讼在总体上是不受欢迎的,尤其是在本巡回法庭。”XYZ Corp.诉合伙企业和非法人团体,载于附表A,编号21-CV-06471,2022年WL 180151,见*12(N.D.IL.2022年1月20日)。第七巡回法院“一再表示不支持当事人匿名诉讼,因为匿名诉讼违背了公众公开司法程序的权利,也违背了公众知道谁在使用由公共税收资助的法院设施和程序的权利。要匿名诉讼,当事人必须证明‘特殊情况’,这一点既超过了有利于被指认的当事人的公共政策,也超过了匿名可能导致的对对方的不利。”身份证。(引用无名氏诉维尔案。载于“联邦判例汇编”第3集第819卷,第372,37677页(第七巡回法庭)。参见《无名氏诉史密斯》案,载于《联邦判例汇编》第三辑,第429卷,第706,710页(第七巡回法庭)。(见“美国最高法院判例汇编”第3集,第112卷,第869,872页(第七巡回法庭)]。1997))。在这里,原告根据中国造假者监控诉讼活动以敲响执法行动警报的陈述,提出了例外情况,这阻碍了原告的诉讼努力。但在这个地区,许多这样的案件每天都是在没有匿名原告的情况下提起的,法院没有理由认为,请求的封闭令(它将防止被告知道他们被起诉,并防止他们辨别所声称的知识产权)本身仍然不足以缓解原告可能对披露其身份的任何担忧。由于原告未能在任何未决的诉状中表明自己的身份,法院在不妨碍的情况下驳回了诉状1,并驳回了以假名5进行诉讼的许可动议。法院还在不妨碍的情况下驳回了许可提交超过12页的文件的动议,并驳回了在第10/30/24年10/30/24日发出动议通知的动议。法院批准原告加盖印章的动议,案卷上的诉状仍加盖印章;原告还提出任何经修改的申诉和加盖印章的修订动议。原告应确保任何修改后的起诉书支持多名被告的合并,并且其提交的材料表明每一名被告在所主张的权利要求上都有胜诉的可能性。原告还应确保其提交的材料支持对每一被告行使个人管辖权;在这方面,仅维护一个网站,即使是在伊利诺伊州可以访问的完全互动的网站,也是不够的。例如,《高级战术武器系统》[LLC诉Real Action Paintball,Inc.][《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷,第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]一案。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”);Rubik‘s Brand,Ltd.诉附表A,No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668,at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示,伊利诺伊州人可以下单,“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”,“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)邮寄的通知。

10/28/2024

NOTICE of Motion by Jay Campbell Miller for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages[12], Sealed motion[13] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/30/2024 at 11:00 AM.

译文:杰伊·坎贝尔·米勒(Jay Campbell Miller)于2024年10月30日上午11:00向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基(John Robert Blakey)提交动议通知,要求提交多余页面[12]、密封动议[13]。

10/28/2024

SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff J. H. for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order and Alternative Service of Process

译文:原告J.H.的密封动议适用于临时限制令和替代诉讼送达

10/28/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff J. H. for leave to file excess pages

译文:原告J.H.的动议允许归档多余的页面

10/23/2024

NOTICE of Motion by Jay Campbell Miller for presentment of motion to seal[5] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/30/2024 at 11:00 AM.

译文:Jay Campbell Miller于2024年10月30日上午11:00向尊敬的John Robert Blakey提交密封动议的动议通知。

10/22/2024

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.

译文:向华盛顿特区注册员提交的版权报告。

10/22/2024

LETTER from Joel Benjamin Rothman dated 10/22/2024 with Copyright Information. (evw,)

译文:乔尔·本杰明·罗斯曼(Joel Benjamin Rothman)于2024年10月22日发出的信函,附有版权信息。(evw,)

10/22/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff J. H. Complaint

译文:原告J. H.的密封文件投诉

附件:
1:(Exhibit 1 - Registration)
2:Schedule "A"

10/21/2024

MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable John Robert Blakey for all further proceedings pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 294(b). Mailed notice

译文:向执行委员会提交临时申请:向执行委员会提交临时申请:根据USC 28 294(b)的规定,案件重新分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基(John Robert Blakey)进行所有进一步诉讼。邮寄通知

10/21/2024

MEMORANDUM by J. H. in support of motion to seal[5]

译文:备忘录作者:J.H.支持密封动议[5]

附件:
1:Declaration of Joel B. Rothman
2:Exhibit 1
3:Exhibit 2
4:Exhibit 3
5:Exhibit 4
6:Exhibit 5

10/22/2024

EMAILED Copyright Request Letter to Plaintiff's Counsel Joel Benjamin Rothman.

译文:EMASYS致原告律师Joel Benjamin Rothman的版权请求信。

10/21/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff J. H. to seal and Proceed Under Pseudonym Temporarily

译文:原告J.H.的动议暂时密封并以假名进行

10/21/2024

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

译文:秘书通知:根据当地规则73.1(b),该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序,包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序,各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权,包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。

10/21/2024

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

译文:案件分配给尊敬的罗伯特·W。盖特尔曼。被指定为治安法官凯里·L.霍莱布·霍塔林。案例分配:随机分配。(民事类别3)。

10/21/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff J. H. by Jay Campbell Miller

译文:原告J.H.律师出庭杰伊·坎贝尔·米勒

10/21/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff J. H. by Rachel I Kaminetzky

译文:原告J.H.律师出庭作者:Rachel I Kaminetzky

10/21/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff J. H. by Joel Benjamin Rothman

译文:原告J.H.律师出庭乔尔·本杰明·罗斯曼

10/21/2024

COMPLAINT filed by J. H.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22633576.

译文:J.H.提出的投诉;陪审团需求。备案费405美元,收据号AILNDC-22633576。

附件:
1:Civil Cover Sheet

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090