最近更新：2025-01-21
2024-cv-10919 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Defendant Hoobuy for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1] (UNOPPOSED)
译文：被告Hoobuy提出的延长就投诉提交答复时间的动议[1]（未接受）
|
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hoobuy by Christopher Paul Keleher
译文：克里斯托弗·保罗·凯莱赫（Christopher Paul Keleher）为被告胡布伊出庭
|
| 01/17/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to certain Defendants
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司自愿解雇通知至于某些被告
|
| 01/10/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to a certain defendant
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司自愿解雇通知对于某被告
|
| 01/08/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to a certain defendant
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司自愿解雇通知对于某被告
|
| 01/03/2025 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Alexander Whang on behalf of Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc.
译文：Alexander Whang代表世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司颁发的服务证书
附件： 1:Exhibit A |
| 01/02/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction [33]. The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by 01/13/2025. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report on 01/14/2025 as to whether the preliminary injunction is opposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must file proof of that service within two business days after service. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的富兰克林大学之前报名参赛。瓦尔德拉马：法院面前的是原告要求下达初步禁令的动议[33]。法院已根据和解提出初步禁令动议，如果在2025年1月13日之前没有被告出庭并反对，法院将认为该动议未遭到反对。原告被指示于2025年1月14日提交一份状态报告，说明初步禁令是否遭到反对。原告必须在该分钟命令被列入备审名单后的一个工作日内向所有剩余被告送达，并必须在送达后两个工作日内提交该送达证明。邮寄通知。
|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 12/27/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to a certain defendant
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司自愿解雇通知对于某被告
|
| 12/24/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[33]
译文：备忘录作者：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司支持初步禁令动议[33]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor |
| 12/24/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. for preliminary injunction
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议初步禁令
附件： 1:Exhibit A |
| 12/24/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, on 12/24/2024, answer due 1/14/2025.
译文：传票退回由世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司执行关于附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，于2024年12月24日答复截止日期：2025年1月14日。
附件： 1:Exhibit A 2:Declaration of Sydney Fenton |
| 12/24/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to certain Defendants
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司自愿解雇通知至于某些被告
|
| 12/17/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court hereby grants Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order [26]. The Temporary Restraining Order [25] shall now expire on 12/30/2024 at 6:00 PM. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的富兰克林大学之前报名参赛。瓦尔德拉马：法院特此批准原告延长临时限制令的动议[26]。临时限制令[25]将于2024年12月30日下午6：00到期。邮寄通知。
|
| 12/02/2024 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 198,000.00 posted by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc.
译文：Sega Corporation、Sega of America，Inc.发布金额为198，000.00美元的保证金
|
| 12/11/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. as to a certain defendant
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司自愿解雇通知对于某被告
|
| 12/11/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[26]
译文：备忘录作者：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司支持杂项救济动议[26]
附件： 1:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor |
| 12/11/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议延长临时限制令
|
| 12/03/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
译文：针对被告发出传票附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 11/22/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motions and as detailed in the accompanying Order, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [12], and motion for electronic service of process [16]. Provided that Plaintiff provides the security described in paragraph 11 of the temporary restraining order, the temporary restraining order shall become effective on 12/2/2024 at 6:00 p.m. and shall expire in fourteen (14) days from the effective date. The Court finds that joinder of the "Schedule A" Defendants is proper at this preliminary stage. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A). The Court notes that no Defendants are prejudiced by permitting joinder at this juncture. See Bose Corp. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 511, 517 (N.D. Ill. 2020). To the extent any defendant appears and objects to joinder, the Court will revisit the issue and is free to sever certain defendants from the case under Rule 21 at that time. Mailed notice.
译文：在Franklin U.Valderrama阁下面前的会议记录：基于动议中所述的理由和所附命令中的详细说明，法院批准了原告的临时限制令动议[12]和电子送达法律程序文件的动议[16]。只要原告提供临时限制令第11段所述的担保，临时限制令将于2024年12月2日下午6时生效。自生效之日起十四(14)天内到期。法院认为，在这一初步阶段，合并“附表A”被告是适当的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)。法院注意到，在这一关头，任何被告都不会因允许合并而受到损害。见《Bose Corp.诉合伙企业及非法人团体》，载于《联邦判例汇编》第334卷，第511,517页(N.D.伊利诺伊州)。2020)。如果任何被告出庭并反对合并，法院将重新审议这一问题，并可根据第21条自由地将某些被告从案件中分离出来。邮寄的通知。
|
| 11/22/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of this Court's order R. 20 [21]. "Motions for reconsideration serve a limited function: to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v. CBI Indus., Inc., 90 F.3d 1264, 1269 (7th Cir. 1996). And the "[d]isposition of a motion for reconsideration is left to the discretion of the district court." Id. at 1270 (7th Cir. 1996); see also Gordon v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., 2020 WL 13506297, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 22, 2020) ("District courts enjoy broad discretion to entertain motions to reconsider prior decisions."). As a threshold issue, the Court must determine whether Plaintiffs have identified newly discovered evidence or a manifest error of law or fact within the Court's order. R. [20], Order. Plaintiffs argue that the Court should reconsider its prior order denying Plaintiffs' motion to seal and for an asset restraint because the Court is authorized to order an asset restraint, and because Plaintiffs are seeking equitable relief in the disgorgement of Defendants' profits. Mot. at 3-4. Plaintiffs cite other courts in this judicial district that have granted asset restraints in Schedule A cases. Id. at 5. Plaintiffs also argue that the Court has authority to transfer funds that are restrained post-judgment, even if Plaintiffs have not yet decided on damages. Id. at 5-6. In the alternative, Plaintiffs ask the Court to authorize an asset restraint limited to the assets attributable to Defendants' infringing conduct. Id. at 9. Plaintiffs do not purport to submit newly discovered evidence as a basis for reconsideration. Thus, the Court understands Plaintiffs' argument to be that the Court's decision denying the motion to seal and asset restraint was a manifest error of law or fact. As the Court stated in its Order, in its experience with myriad Schedule A cases, although Plaintiffs almost always request equitable relief as a possible remedy, in almost every Schedule A case, Plaintiffs end up requesting statutory damages at the end of the case. Order at 4-5. But Plaintiffs have done enough, if barely, in their motion to reconsider to convince the Court that, because Plaintiffs do seek an accounting of profits (that is, disgorgement of profits) under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), an asset freeze is warranted here. See, e.g., Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2013 WL 12314399, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 31, 2013). As the Deckers court noted, "where equitable relief is sought, the appropriate scope of prejudgment restraint must be limited only to what is reasonably necessary to secure the (future) equitable relief"here, that would be the amount of Defendants' profits resulting from its alleged counterfeit sales. Id. Since Defendants have not yet appeared, Plaintiffs necessarily have no discovery, so it is difficult, if not impossible, for Plaintiffs to know Defendants' profits. Therefore, the Court will adopt Plaintiffs' alternative proposal in the TRO to "restrain and enjoin any such accounts or funds from transferring or disposing of any of Defendants' assets traceable to the proceeds of the sales of products using the Sega Trademarks and/or Sega Copyrighted Works, until further ordered by this Court. Upon a showing that restrained assets are not attributable to the sale of products using the Sega Trademarks and/or Sega Copyrighted Works, the Court will modify the asset restraint." Mot. at 10. However, the Court acknowledges that, at this stage without the benefit of discovery, the restraint will functionally be a complete asset restraint. To the extent that the restraint is overly broad, any defendants may file challenges to the scope of the TRO by submitting evidence that some or all of the money has other sources. However, at a later stage, if and when Plaintiffs have had an opportunity to conduct discovery and determine any appeared Defendants' profits, the Court will determine whether an asset freeze remains appropriate. See, e.g., Nirvana, L.L.C. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2022 WL 22886568, at *2 n.2 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 1, 2022). Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the Court grants in part Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider [20] and will grant a limited asset restraint as described above, and grants the motion for leave to file certain documents under seal [3]. The TRO will be entered as a separate Order. The Court terminates Plaintiffs' motion for extension of time to comply with the Court's Order [22] as moot. Mailed notice.
译文：富兰克林·U·瓦尔德拉马阁下的会议记录：法院审查了原告要求重新审议本法院命令R.20[21]的动议。“复议动议的作用是有限的：纠正明显的法律或事实错误或提出新发现的证据。”《农业信贷协会诉CBI Indus，Inc.》[《联邦判例汇编》第三辑，第90卷，第1264,1269页(第七巡回法庭)]。1996年)。而“复议动议的地位则由地区法院自行决定。”身份证。1270(第七巡回法庭)1996年)；另见戈登诉加勒比邮轮公司，2020年WL 13506297，at*1(N.D.伊利诺伊州2020年1月22日)(“地区法院享有广泛的自由裁量权，可以受理重新考虑先前裁决的动议。”)作为一个门槛问题，法院必须确定原告是否确认了新发现的证据或法院命令中的明显法律错误或事实。R.[20]，秩序。原告辩称，法院应重新考虑其先前驳回原告要求封存和限制资产的动议的命令，因为法院有权下令限制资产，而且原告在返还被告利润方面寻求公平救济。莫特。比分是3比4。原告援引了这个司法区的其他法院在附表A案件中授予资产限制的案例。身份证。原告还辩称，即使原告尚未就损害赔偿做出决定，法院也有权转移判决后受到限制的资金。身份证。比分是5比6。在另一种情况下，原告要求法院授权对可归因于被告侵权行为的资产进行资产限制。身份证。原告不打算提交新发现的证据作为复议的基础。因此，法院认为原告的论点是，法院拒绝印章和财产限制动议的决定是一个明显的法律或事实错误。正如法院在其命令中所述，在处理无数附表A案件的经验中，尽管原告几乎总是要求衡平救济作为一种可能的补救办法，但在几乎每个附表A案件中，原告最终都会在案件结束时请求法定损害赔偿。请在4-5点。但是，原告已经在他们的动议中做了足够的重新考虑，以说服法院，因为原告确实寻求根据《美国法典》第15编第1117(A)条对利润进行核算(即，返还利润)，因此有理由冻结资产。例如，见《Deckers Outdoor Corp.诉合伙企业和非法人团体》，见附表A，2013年WL 12314399，见*2(N.D.2013年10月31日)。正如德克斯法院所指出的那样，“在寻求衡平法救济的情况下，判决前限制的适当范围必须仅限于确保(未来)衡平法救济所需的合理范围”，即被告从其所谓的假冒销售中获得的利润数额。身份证。由于被告尚未出现，原告必然没有发现，因此原告很难，如果不是不可能的话，知道被告的利润。因此，法院将采用原告在《反倾销令》中提出的替代建议，即“限制和禁止任何此类账户或资金转移或处置可追溯到使用世嘉商标和/或世嘉版权作品的产品销售收益的任何被告资产，直到本法院进一步命令。一旦证明受限制的资产不能归因于销售使用世嘉商标和/或世嘉版权作品的产品，法院将修改资产限制。”莫特。10.然而，法院承认，在没有证据开示好处的情况下，限制在功能上将是一种完全的资产限制。在限制过于宽泛的情况下，任何被告都可以通过提交证据证明部分或全部资金有其他来源，对TRO的范围提出质疑。然而，在后来的阶段，如果原告有机会进行证据披露并确定任何出庭被告的利润，法院将决定冻结资产是否仍然合适。例如，见《涅槃》，L.L.C.诉附表“A”中确定的合伙企业和非法人团体，2022年WL 22886568，载于*2 N.2(N.D.2022年3月1日)。因此，出于上述原因，法院部分批准了原告要求重新考虑的动议[20]，并将如上所述给予有限的资产限制，并批准允许在盖章的情况下提交某些文件的动议[3]。TRO将作为单独的订单输入。法院终止了原告关于延长遵守法院命令的时间的动议[22]，认为这是没有意义的。邮寄的通知。
|
| 11/09/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. for Extension of Time to Comply with Order [20]
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议延长遵守命令的时间[20]
|
| 11/09/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. for reconsideration regarding order[20]
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议重新考虑命令[20]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor |
| 11/04/2024 | ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/4/2024. Mailed notice.
译文：命令：由尊敬的富兰克林·U签署。瓦尔德拉马于2024年4月11日。邮寄通知。
|
| 11/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, the Court vacates its prior Minute Entry granting Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [3], and instead denies the motion. On or before 11/11/2024, Plaintiff is directed to file the provisionally sealed documents [2], [15] publicly on the docket. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a notice of dismissal. Enter Order. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的富兰克林大学之前报名参赛。瓦尔德拉马：出于随附命令中解释的原因，法院撤销了先前批准原告盖章提交许可动议的分钟记录[3]，而是驳回了该动议。2024年11月11日或之前，原告被指示将临时密封的文件[2]、[15]公开提交到待审目录中。或者，原告可以提交解雇通知。输入顺序。邮寄通知。
|
| 10/25/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file certain documents under seal [3]. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的富兰克林大学之前报名参赛。瓦尔德拉马：出于动议中所述的原因，法院批准原告的动议，要求允许提交某些密封文件[3]。邮寄通知。
|
| 10/25/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[16]
译文：备忘录作者：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司支持杂项救济动议[16]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor |
| 10/25/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议根据美联储提供电子流程服务。R. Civ.第4页（f）（3）
|
| 10/25/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. Exhibit 3, Parts 1-12 regarding declaration[14]
译文：原告Sega Corporation、Sega of America，Inc.的密封展品附件3，关于声明的第1-12部分[14]
附件： 1:(Exhibit 3, Part 12) 2:Exhibit 3, Part 11 3:Exhibit 3, Part 10 4:Exhibit 3, Part 9 5:Exhibit 3, Part 7 6:Exhibit 3, Part 8 7:Exhibit 3, Part 6 8:Exhibit 3, Part 5 9:Exhibit 3, Part 4 10:Exhibit 3, Part 3 11:Exhibit 3, Part 2 12:Exhibit 3, Part 1 |
| 10/25/2024 | DECLARATION of Paul Varley regarding memorandum in support of motion[13]
译文：保罗·瓦利关于支持动议的备忘录的声明[13]
附件： 1:Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 10/25/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[12]
译文：备忘录作者：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司支持杂项救济动议[12]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor |
| 10/25/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议适用于签订临时限制令，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制和快速发现
|
| 10/24/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料发送。
|
| 10/24/2024 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
附件： 1:(List of Trademarks, Ex. 2) 2:(List of Trademarks, Ex. 1) |
| 10/23/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 10/23/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的富兰克林·U。瓦尔德拉马。被指定为治安法官尊敬的杨·B。Kim.案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 10/23/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. by Alexander Whang
译文：原告律师出庭世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司作者：Alexander Whang
|
| 10/23/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. by Sydney Paige Fenton
译文：原告律师出庭世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司悉尼·佩奇·芬顿
|
| 10/23/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. by Martin Francis Trainor
译文：原告律师出庭世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司马丁·弗朗西斯·特雷纳
|
| 10/23/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc.
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司涉及商标的索赔通知
|
| 10/23/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc.
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 10/23/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 10/23/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal
译文：原告世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提出的动议允许将某些文件密封归档
|
| 10/23/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告Sega Corporation、Sega of America，Inc.的密封展品有关投诉的附表A [1]
|
| 10/23/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Sega Corporation, Sega of America, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22644266.
译文：世嘉公司、世嘉美国公司提交的投诉;备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22644266。
附件： 1:Exhibit 4 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 2 4:Exhibit 1 5:Exhibit 5 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
