最近更新：2025-01-24
2024-cv-11007 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 11/26/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Amended Schedule A
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，有限公司修订附表A
|
| 11/26/2024 | AMENDED complaint by Casio Computer Co., Ltd. against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto
译文：卡西欧电脑公司修改投诉，有限公司针对修订后的附表A中确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 11/26/2024 | EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 24-0032: IT APPEARING THAT, the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable April M. Perry; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 290 cases be reassigned to the Honorable April M. Perry; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable April M. Perry's webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable April M. Perry to the Court's civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such cases; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable April M. Perry to the Court's criminal case assignment system ninety (90) days so that Judge Perry shall thereafter receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable April M. Perry for all further proceedings. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/26/2024.
译文：执行委员会命令：一般命令24-0032：看来，所附清单上的民事案件已被选择重新分配，以形成尊敬的四月·M·佩里法官的初始日历；因此，特此命令将所附的290起案件清单重新分配给尊敬的四月·M·佩里阁下；并进一步命令，受该命令影响的所有各方必须审查法院网站上的四月·M·佩里阁下的网页，以审查关于日程安排和案件管理程序的指示；并进一步命令，任何依据本命令重新分配的民事案件将不会被随机重新分配，以自本命令的日期起计12个月内创建一名新的区域法院法官的初始日历；并进一步命令法院书记官在下一个工作日将尊敬的四月·M·佩里加入法院的民事案件分配系统，以便她将获得该等案件的全部份额；还指示法院书记员将尊敬的阿普丽尔·M·佩里加入法院的刑事案件指派制度九十(90)天，以便佩里法官此后将收到此类案件的全部份额。此案重新分配给尊敬的阿普丽尔·M·佩里进行所有进一步的诉讼。尊贵的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基不再负责此案。由尊敬的弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔于2024年11月26日签署。
|
| 11/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this lawsuit, Plaintiff seeks to sue 149 separate defendants for trademark and trade dress infringement. See 1, 8. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single trademark infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). On this score, Plaintiff alleges that, although Defendants "operate under multiple fictitious names, there are numerous similarities among the Defendant Internet Stores. For example, some of the Defendant websites have virtually identical layouts, even though different aliases were used to register the respective online marketplace accounts. In addition, the counterfeit Products for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the counterfeit Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated. The Defendant Internet Stores also include other notable common features, including use of the same online marketplace account registration patterns, unique shopping cart platforms, accepted payment methods, check-out methods, meta data, illegitimate SEO tactics, HTML user-defined variables, domain redirection, lack of contact information, identically or similarly priced items and volume sales discounts, similar hosting services, similar name servers, and the use of the same text and images. 1 35. While these allegations may suffice to support joinder, they are undermined significantly by the screenshot evidence submitted along with Plaintiff's pleadings. A cursory review of that evidence shows, for example, that, although some defendant stores do appear to use some of the same stock photos, others do not, showing instead a variety of images and undermining Plaintiff's relatedness claim. See, e.g. 20 at 1, 11, 15, 23. Additionally, some of the product images appear inconsistent with the claimed use of Plaintiff's infringement claims. See, e.g., 16 at 8 (no apparent use of Plaintiff's mark); 17 at 32 (same); 18 at 1 (same); 15 at 121 (no apparent infringement of Plaintiff's claimed trade dress); 18 at 28, 65 (same); 19 at 11, 44 (same); 20 at 15 (same). As a result, the Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's complaint 1 and denies as moot Plaintiff's motions for leave to seal 7 and file excess pages 12 and motion for TRO 13. The 11/6/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of the identified defendants in this single action, it may do so by 11/26/24. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that personal jurisdiction exists as to each Defendant because "each Defendant conducts significant business in Illinois and in this Judicial District, and the acts and events giving rise to this lawsuit of which each Defendant stands accused were undertaken in Illinois and in this Judicial District. In addition, each Defendant has offered to sell and ship infringing products into this Judicial District." 1 12. But the former is a legal conclusion (unsupported by the submitted screenshot evidence), and the latter remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前的一分钟：在这起诉讼中，原告试图起诉149名独立的被告商标和商业外观侵权。见1，8.只有在针对被告的主张是“关于或产生于同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”，并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题的情况下，将多个被告合并在一个商标侵权诉讼中才是适当的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。在这一点上，原告声称，尽管被告“以多个虚构的名字经营，但被告网店之间有许多相似之处。例如，一些被告网站的布局几乎相同，即使使用不同的别名注册各自的在线市场账户。此外，被告在网上商店出售的假冒产品有相似之处和相互关联的标记，表明假冒产品是由共同来源制造的，根据信息和信念，被告是相互关联的。被告的网上商店还包括其他显著的共同特征，包括使用相同的在线市场账户注册模式、独特的购物车平台、接受的支付方式、结账方式、元数据、非法的SEO策略、HTML用户定义变量、域名重定向、缺少联系信息、相同或类似价格的商品和批量销售折扣、相似的托管服务、相似的名称服务器，以及使用相同的文本和图像。135分。虽然这些指控可能足以支持合并诉讼，但随着原告的诉状一起提交的屏幕截图证据，它们被大大削弱了。例如，粗略地回顾一下证据就会发现，尽管一些被告商店似乎确实使用了一些相同的库存照片，但其他商店并没有使用，相反，显示了各种图像，削弱了原告的关联性主张。参见，例如，20 at 1，11，15，23。此外，一些产品图像似乎与原告声称的使用侵权索赔不符。见，例如，8分16分(没有明显使用原告的标记)；17分32分(相同)；18分1分(相同)；15分121分(明显侵犯原告所声称的商业外观)；18分28分、65分(相同)；19分11分、44分(相同)；20分15分(相同)。因此，法院在不损害原告的情况下驳回了原告的诉状1，并驳回了原告关于许可盖章7和提交多余的第12页的动议和关于tro 13的动议。所有动议的动议日期均为11/6/24。如果原告能够根据规则第11条的义务修改其诉状，以声称事实支持在这一单一诉讼中确定的被告合并，它可以在11/26/24之前这样做。如果原告不遵守，法院将驳回此案。如果原告选择修改其诉状，它还应支持其与个人管辖权有关的指控。原告声称，对每一名被告都有属人管辖权，因为“每名被告在伊利诺伊州和这个司法区都有重大业务，而引起这起诉讼的行为和事件都是在伊利诺伊州和这个司法区进行的。此外，每名被告都提出向本司法区出售和运送侵权产品。“1 12.但前者是一个法律结论(没有提交的截图证据支持)，后者仍然不足以赋予人的管辖权。见，例如，am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n，Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案，《联邦判例汇编》，第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权)；高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball，Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷，第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上每个可以访问该互动网站的地点向被告开放个人管辖权。“)；Rubik‘s Brand，Ltd.诉附表A，No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668，at*3(N.D.ill.Inc.，2021年3月4日)确定的合伙企业和非法人团体(屏幕截图证据表明，伊利诺伊州人可以下订单，”无非是维持一个在伊利诺伊州可以访问的互动网站，“仅此一项不能授予个人管辖权”)。
|
| 10/28/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, 13, motion for leave to file excess pages 12, motion to seal document 7 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/6/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：迈克尔·A的动议通知Hierl要求于2024年6月11日上午11：00向尊敬的John Robert Blakey提交临时限制令动议、13、要求提交多余第12页的动议、密封文件7的动议。
|
| 10/28/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
译文：卡西欧电脑公司涉及商标索赔通知，公司
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Takeyama Declaration
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，株式会社附件2竹山宣言第六部分
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Takeyama Declaration
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，有限公司附件2竹山宣言第5部分
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Takeyama Declaration
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，株式会社附件2竹山宣言第4部分
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Takeyama Declaration
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，株式会社附件2竹山宣言第3部分
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Takeyama Declaration
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，株式会社附件2竹山宣言第2部分
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Takeyama Declaration
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，株式会社附件2竹山宣言第一部分
|
| 10/28/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Casio Computer Co., Ltd. in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 13
译文：备忘录由卡西欧电脑公司提供，有限公司支持临时限制令动议，13
附件： 1:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3) 2:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 4:Declaration Hierl Declaration 5:Exhibit 1 6:Declaration Takeyama Declaration |
| 10/28/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司提出的动议，有限公司申请临时限制令原告单方面申请临时限制令，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制、快速发现以及通过电子邮件和/或电子出版物提供处理服务
|
| 10/28/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司提出的动议，有限公司请求提交多余页面原告提出的超过页面限制的动议
|
| 10/28/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料
|
| 10/28/2024 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
|
| 10/25/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 10/25/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Civil Direct Assignment).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）。被指定为治安法官尊敬的杨·B。Kim.案例分配：直接分配。（民事类别民事直接转让）。
|
| 10/25/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.
译文：卡西欧电脑公司根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司，公司
|
| 10/25/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Sealed Schedule A
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司的密封文件，有限公司密封附表A
|
| 10/25/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司提出的动议，有限公司将密封文件原告要求允许盖章提交的动议
|
| 10/25/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by John Wilson
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司律师出庭，约翰·威尔逊有限公司
|
| 10/25/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Robert Payton Mcmurray
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司律师出庭，罗伯特·佩顿·麦克默里有限公司
|
| 10/25/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by William Benjamin Kalbac
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司律师出庭，威廉·本杰明·卡尔巴克有限公司
|
| 10/25/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Michael A. Hierl
译文：原告卡西欧电脑有限公司律师出庭，迈克尔·A·有限公司Hierl
|
| 10/25/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 10/25/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22654470.
译文：卡西欧电脑公司提交的投诉，有限公司;陪审团需求。备案费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22654470。
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
