最近更新：2025-01-27
2024-cv-11042 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 01/06/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the Court's trial schedule, the 1/8/25 Notice of Motion date is stricken, and the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for default and default judgment 39 is hereby reset to 1/29/25 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice.
译文：向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）提交的临时条目：根据法院的审判时间表，动议通知日期已取消25年1月8日，原告缺席动议和缺席判决39的听证会特此重置为25年1月29日上午11：00在1203法庭举行。邮寄通知。
|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 12/31/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for default judgment 39 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/8/2025 at 11:00 AM.
译文：基思·A的动议通知Vogt于2025年1月8日上午11：00向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）提交第39号默认判决动议。
|
| 12/31/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Heather Picquelle in support of motion for default judgment 39
译文：Heather Picquelle的备忘录支持缺席判决动议39
附件： 1:(Declaration of Keith A. Vogt) 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 1 |
| 12/31/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle for default judgment as to the Defendants Identified in Schedule A to the [Amended] Complaint
译文：原告Heather Picquelle提出的对[修订后]诉状附表A中确定的被告做出缺席判决的动议
|
| 12/15/2024 | NEW PARTIES: zhijiangshizhuohuliaoshangmaoshanghang, zhaoyongnjksnvawrwgrwagrww, gaoweisd, LiShuaiShuai01 and Tongling Shengsheng E-commerce Center Sole Proprietorship added to case caption.
译文：新政党：Zhijiang Shuohuao shangmaohanghang、zhaoyongnjksnvawrwgrww、gaoweisd、LiShuaiShuaiShuai 01和桐灵盛电子商务中心独资企业添加到案例说明中。
|
| 12/13/2024 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/13/2024. Mailed notice
译文：约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）阁下于2024年12月13日签署初步禁令。邮寄通知
|
| 12/13/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 12/13/2024. Defendants failed to appear and failed to notify Chambers of any scheduling conflicts. No defendant has filed an appearance in this matter or otherwise objected in response to the TRO or Plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction 32. Accordingly, and based upon the same findings made in this Court's TRO 30, this Court finds that a preliminary injunction is appropriate and warranted, as well as unopposed and grants Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 32. Enter Preliminary Injunction Order. The Court directs the Clerk to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the Court's docket within three business days. Plaintiff may find instructions at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. Plaintiff shall file a status report by 1/31/25. Mailed notice
译文：约翰·罗伯特·布莱基阁下的会议记录：2024年12月13日举行的动议听证会。被告没有出庭，也没有通知分庭任何日程安排冲突。没有被告就此事提出出庭或以其他方式反对传票或原告提出的实施初步禁令的动议32。因此，根据本法院第30号令的相同调查结果，本法院认为初步禁令是适当和正当的，而且没有异议，批准了原告关于初步禁令的动议32。输入初步禁制令。法院指示书记官开启这件事以前封存的任何文件。原告律师被指示在三个工作日内将附表A所列的所有被告添加到法院的案卷中。原告可以在https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf.上找到说明原告应于1/31/25前提交状态报告。邮寄通知
|
| 12/10/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the Court's trial schedule, the 12/11/24 motion hearing date is stricken and reset for 12/13/24 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）面前的临时条目：根据法院的审判时间表，12/11/24动议听证会日期被取消，并重置为12/13/24上午11：00在法庭1203。邮寄通知
|
| 12/03/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heather Picquelle as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 12/3/2024, answer due 12/24/2024.
译文：Heather Picquelle于2024年3月12日就附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会返回传票，答复截止日期为2024年12月24日。
附件： 1:(Declaration of Service) |
| 12/03/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 32 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/11/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：基思·A的动议通知Vogt于2024年11月12日上午11：00向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）提交初步禁令32动议。
|
| 12/03/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Heather Picquelle in support of motion for preliminary injunction 32
译文：Heather Picquelle的备忘录支持初步禁令32
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration) 2:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 12/03/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle for preliminary injunction
译文：原告Heather Picquelle提出初步禁令动议
|
| 12/02/2024 | INJUNCTION BOND in the amount of $ $10,000 posted by Heather Picquelle (Document not scanned).
译文：Heather Picquelle发布的金额为10，000美元的保释金（文件未扫描）。
|
| 11/26/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：针对被告发出传票附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 11/25/2024 | SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/25/2024. Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）于2024年11月25日签署密封令。邮寄通知
|
| 11/25/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, seeking to sue five Defendants for infringement of a single copyright 20, 21. As previously explained, joinder of multiple defendants in a single trademark infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). On this score, Plaintiff alleges that, the "Defendant Internet Stores share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. For example, all Defendants offered to sell and sold the same infringing goods featuring the identically modified (cropped) version of the [protected work]." 20 7. Plaintiff's allegations remain supported by screenshot evidence submitted along with the pleadings. See id.; [26-1]. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff may proceed on its complaint joining the identified Defendants. Additionally, based upon the materials submitted, this Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 22 and motion for leave to file excess pages 23. The Court also grants Plaintiff's ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order 24. Enter sealed temporary restraining order. Absent further order, this TRO will expire on 12/9/24. The 11/27/24 and 12/4/24 Notice of Motion dates are stricken as to all motions. Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前的一分钟：原告提交了一份修改后的起诉书，寻求起诉五名被告侵犯了单一版权20，21。如前所述，只有在针对被告的主张是“关于或产生于同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”，并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题的情况下，多个被告在单一商标侵权诉讼中合并仍然是适当的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。在这方面，原告声称“被告网上商店共享唯一的识别符，如提供销售的未经授权产品的设计元素和相似性，建立了它们之间的逻辑关系，并暗示被告的非法操作源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件。例如，所有被告提出出售和销售具有相同修改(剪裁)版本的[受保护作品]的相同侵权商品。”见id；[26-1]。因此，法院认为，原告可以与已确定的被告一起提起诉讼。此外，根据提交的材料，本法院批准了原告关于允许用印章22进行存档的动议和关于允许对多余的第23页进行存档的动议。法院还批准了原告单方面提出的进入临时限制令的动议。进入密封的临时限制令。如无进一步订单，本临时反倾销令将于12/9/24到期。所有议案的动议预告日期分别为11/27/24及12/4/24。邮寄通知
|
| 11/25/2024 | Re-Notice of Motion for Presentment of 24 Renewed Exparte motion NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/4/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：提出24项重新独立动议的动议的重新通知Keith A. Vogt于2024年4月12日上午11：00向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）发表演讲。
|
| 11/25/2024 | Renewed Exparte Motion 24 NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/27/2024 at 11:00 AM.
译文：基思·A·基思·A·更新的ExParte Motion 24动议通知Vogt于2024年11月27日上午11：00向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）发表演讲。
|
| 11/25/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Heather Picquelle regarding memorandum in support of motion, 25
译文：原告Heather Picquelle的密封附件密封附件2，Heather Picquelle关于支持动议的备忘录的声明，25
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2-1) |
| 11/25/2024 | MEMORANDUM in support of 24 Renewed Exparte motion
译文：支持24项重新提出的独立动议的备忘录
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1, of Heather Picquelle's declaration) 2:Declaration of Heather Picquelle 3:Exhibit 1-2, of of Keith A. Vogt's declaration 4:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 11/25/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle for leave to file excess pages
译文：原告Heather Picquelle提出请求提交多余页面的动议
|
| 11/25/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle for leave to file under seal
译文：原告Heather Picquelle提出的密封申请
|
| 11/25/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle Schedule A to Amended Complaint 20
译文：原告Heather Picquelle的密封文件修订投诉20的附表A
|
| 11/25/2024 | AMENDED complaint by Heather Picquelle against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：Heather Picquelle对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会的修改投诉
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 11/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this lawsuit, Plaintiff seeks to sue 18 separate defendants for infringement of 23 copyrights. See 1, 12. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single copyright infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). On this score, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." 1 7, 10. Plaintiff further alleges that "the Infringing Products for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the Infringing Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated." Id. 31. But these allegations are undermined by the screenshot evidence submitted along with Plaintiff's pleadings. That evidence shows that, although some of the defendant internet stores do use similar photos, they use different layouts, descriptions, and language, and for the most part offer different products. Additionally, Plaintiff offers nothing to suggest a relationship between defendants allegedly infringing one copyright and defendants allegedly infringing other copyrights. As a result, the Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's complaint 1 and denies as moot Plaintiff's motions for leave to seal 13 and file excess pages 14 and motion for TRO 15. The 11/6/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of the identified defendants in this single action, it may do so by 11/26/24. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that this Court "has personal jurisdiction over each Defendant, because each Defendant conducts significant business in Illinois and in this judicial district. Furthermore, the acts and events giving rise to this lawsuit were undertaken in Illinois and in this judicial district. In addition, each defendant has offered to sell and ship infringing products into this judicial district." 1 15. But the former is a legal conclusion (unsupported by the submitted screenshot evidence), and the latter remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前的一分钟：在这起诉讼中，原告试图起诉18名独立的被告，指控他们侵犯了23项著作权。见1，12.只有当针对被告的主张是“关于或产生于同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”，并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时，将多个被告合并在一个侵犯版权的诉讼中仍然是适当的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。在这方面，原告声称被告“共享唯一的识别符，如提供销售的未经授权产品的设计元素和相似性，建立了它们之间的逻辑关系，并暗示被告的非法操作源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”。原告进一步声称，“被告在网上商店销售的侵权产品具有相似性和相互关联的标记，表明侵权产品是由共同来源制造的，并且根据信息和信念，被告是相互关联的。”身份证。31.但这些指控被与原告的诉状一起提交的截图证据所破坏。这些证据表明，尽管一些被告的网店确实使用了类似的照片，但它们使用了不同的布局、描述和语言，并且在大多数情况下提供了不同的产品。此外，原告没有提供任何证据表明被告侵犯一项著作权和涉嫌侵犯其他著作权的被告之间的关系。因此，法院在不损害原告的情况下驳回了原告的诉状1，并驳回了原告关于许可加盖印章13页和提交多余第14页的动议以及关于tro 15的动议。所有动议的动议日期均为11/6/24。如果原告能够根据规则第11条的义务修改其诉状，以声称事实支持在这一单一诉讼中确定的被告合并，它可以在11/26/24之前这样做。如果原告不遵守，法院将驳回此案。如果原告选择修改其诉状，它还应支持其与个人管辖权有关的指控。原告声称，本法院对每一名被告都有个人管辖权，因为每一名被告在伊利诺伊州和这个司法地区都有重要的业务。此外，引起这起诉讼的行为和事件都是在伊利诺伊州和这个司法地区进行的。此外，每一名被告都提出要向这个司法地区销售和运输侵权产品。115.但前者是一个法律结论(没有提交的截图证据支持)，后者仍然不足以赋予个人管辖权。见，例如，am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n，Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案，《联邦判例汇编》，第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权)；高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball，Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷，第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”)；Rubik‘s Brand，Ltd.诉附表A，No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668，at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示，伊利诺伊州人可以下单，“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”，“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)邮寄通知
|
| 10/31/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle for leave to file excess pages
译文：原告Heather Picquelle提出请求提交多余页面的动议
|
| 10/31/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle for leave to file under seal
译文：原告Heather Picquelle提出的密封申请
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Yi Bu
译文：原告Heather Picquelle律师由Yi Bu出庭
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Yanling Jiang
译文：姜艳玲为原告希瑟·皮卡尔出庭律师
|
| 10/28/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 10/28/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）。Jeannice W.被指定为治安法官腾。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别3）。
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Monica Rita Martin
译文：莫妮卡·丽塔·马丁（Monica Rita Martin）为原告希瑟·皮克尔（Heather Picquelle）出庭
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Christopher Romero
译文：克里斯托弗·罗梅罗（Christopher Romero）为原告希瑟·皮克尔（Heather Picquelle）出庭
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
译文：卡梅伦·尤金·麦金泰尔（Cameron Eugene Mcintyre）为原告希瑟·皮卡尔（Heather Picquelle）出庭
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Adam Grodman
译文：Adam Grodman为原告Heather Picquelle出庭律师
|
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heather Picquelle by Keith A. Vogt
译文：基思·A·原告希瑟·皮卡尔（Heather Picquelle）出庭律师沃格特
|
| 10/28/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 10/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Heather Picquelle Schedule A to Complaint 1
译文：原告Heather Picquelle的密封文件投诉1的附表A
|
| 10/28/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Heather Picquelle; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22657636.
译文：投诉人由Heather Picquelle提出;提交费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22657636。
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
