最近更新：2025-01-29
2024-cv-11152 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 11/27/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation Amended Schedule A
译文：原告东京电视台的密封文件修订附表A
|
| 11/27/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation Exhibit 3
译文：原告东京电视台的密封文件附件3
|
| 11/27/2024 | AMENDED complaint by TV Tokyo Corporation against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto
译文：东京电视台对修改后的附表A中确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会的修改投诉
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2) 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 11/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this lawsuit, Plaintiff seeks to sue 252 separate defendants for trademark and copyright infringement. See 1, 8. But joinder of multiple defendants in a single copyright or trademark infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). In this regard, Plaintiff alleges that, although Defendants "operate under multiple fictitious names, there are numerous similarities among the Defendants' Internet Stores. For example, some of the Defendants' websites have identical layouts, even though different aliases were used to register the respective online marketplace accounts. In addition, the counterfeit products for sale in the Defendants' Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the counterfeit products were manufactured by a common source and that Defendants are interrelated. The Defendants' Internet Stores also include other notable common features, including use of the same online marketplace account registration patterns, unique shopping cart platforms, similar payment and check-out methods, meta data, illegitimate SEO tactics, HTML user-defined variables, domain redirection, lack of contact information, identically or similarly priced items and volume sales discounts, similar hosting services, similar name servers and the use of the same text and images." 1 22. But the allegations are conclusory and unsupported. As a result, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to support the joinder of 252 separate defendants in this single suit and thus dismisses Plaintiff's complaint 1 without prejudice. The Court also denies without prejudice Plaintiff's motion to seal 7. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations concerning personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that this Court "has personal jurisdiction over each Defendant, in that each Defendant conducts business in Illinois and in this Judicial District, and the acts and events giving rise to this lawsuit of which each Defendant stands accused were undertaken in Illinois and in this Judicial District. In addition, each Defendant has offered to sell and ship infringing products into this Judicial District." 1 5. But the former is a legal conclusion (unsupported by the submitted screenshot evidence), and the latter remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice
译文：尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前的一分钟：在这起诉讼中，原告试图起诉252名独立的被告商标和版权侵权。见1，8.但是，只有在针对被告的主张是“关于或产生于同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”，并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题的情况下，将多个被告合并在一个版权或商标侵权诉讼中才是适当的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。对此，原告称，虽然被告“以多个虚构的名字经营，但被告的网店之间有许多相似之处。例如，一些被告的网站具有相同的布局，即使使用不同的别名注册各自的在线市场账户。此外，被告网店出售的假冒产品具有相似性和相互关联的标志，表明假冒产品是由同一来源制造的，被告是相互关联的。被告的网上商店还包括其他显著的共同特征，包括使用相同的在线市场账户注册模式、独特的购物车平台、类似的支付和结账方法、元数据、非法的搜索引擎优化策略、超文本标记语言用户定义变量、域名重定向、缺少联系信息、相同或类似价格的物品和批量销售折扣、类似的托管服务、相似的名称服务器以及使用相同的文本和图像。“但这些指控是不可知的，没有得到支持。因此，法院认为，原告未能在这一单一诉讼中支持252名独立被告的合并，因此在不损害原告的情况下驳回了原告的申诉1。最高法院还不带偏见地否认原告关于封存7号的动议。如果原告选择修改其诉状，它也应该支持其关于个人管辖权的指控。原告声称，本法院“对每一名被告都有个人管辖权，因为每一名被告在伊利诺伊州和本司法区开展业务，而引起这起诉讼的行为和事件都是在伊利诺伊州和本司法区进行的。此外，每一名被告都提出向本司法区销售和运输侵权产品。”15.但前者是法律结论(没有提交的截图证据支持)，后者仍然不足以赋予个人管辖权。见，例如，am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n，Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案，《联邦判例汇编》，第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权)；高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball，Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷，第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”)；Rubik‘s Brand，Ltd.诉附表A，No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668，at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示，伊利诺伊州人可以下单，“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”，“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)邮寄通知
|
| 10/31/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料发送。
|
| 10/31/2024 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.
译文：向华盛顿特区注册员提交的版权报告。
|
| 10/31/2024 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
译文：向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交MASYS商标报告。
|
| 10/30/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by TV Tokyo Corporation
译文：东京电视台根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 10/30/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation Sealed Schedule A
译文：原告东京电视台的密封文件密封附表A
|
| 10/30/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
译文：原告东京电视台要求密封文件的动议原告要求允许密封提交的动议
|
| 10/30/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 10/30/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）。被指定为治安法官尊敬的M。大卫·韦斯曼。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 10/30/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation by John Wilson
译文：约翰·威尔逊（John Wilson）为原告东京电视台公司出庭律师
|
| 10/30/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation by Robert Payton Mcmurray
译文：罗伯特·佩顿·麦克默里（Robert Payton Mcmurray）为原告东京电视公司出庭
|
| 10/30/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation by William Benjamin Kalbac
译文：威廉·本杰明·卡尔巴克（William Benjamin Kalbac）为原告东京电视公司出庭律师
|
| 10/30/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation by Michael A. Hierl
译文：原告东京电视台公司律师迈克尔·A·出庭Hierl
|
| 10/30/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 10/30/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by TV Tokyo Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22667834.
译文：东京电视台提出的投诉;陪审团要求。备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22667834。
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
