2024-cv-12253 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网站

最近更新:2025-04-16
更新案件

2024-cv-12253 AI分析

Burdon v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网站 日期:11/27/2024

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网站 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网站 品牌:Sebastian 气球狗

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网站 律所:David

起诉文件:点击查看


02/18/2025

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC

译文:向华盛顿特区注册员提交的MASYS版权报告

02/18/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal [13], this action is being dismissed without prejudice as to the only remaining Defendant. All pending motions and deadlines are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,)

译文:在尊敬的拉桑达·A之前报名参赛。狩猎:根据联邦民事诉讼规则41(a)(1)和原告自愿解雇[13],该诉讼被驳回,但不损害唯一剩余被告。所有悬而未决的动议和截止日期均因无意义而终止。民事案件终止。邮寄通知(凝胶,)

02/17/2025

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sebastian Burdon of remaining Defendant

译文:塞巴斯蒂安·伯顿自愿解雇剩余被告的通知

02/11/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file supplemental joinder memorandum [11] is denied. As an initial matter, Plaintiff's counsel, who should be familiar with this Court's procedures, failed to notice the motion for presentment. Any further non-compliant filings by counsel will be summarily stricken. Substantively, the relief sought is inappropriate because the Court did not grant (nor has Plaintiff requested) leave to file a supplemental joinder memorandum. Rather, after reviewing Plaintiff's joinder memorandum [9], the Court entered an order [10] dismissing Defendants 2 through 74 due to improper joinder, allowing the case to proceed as to Defendant 1, and granting Plaintiff until 2/10/25 file certain motions. Because Plaintiff has not sought appropriate relief to proceed with this case against the remaining Defendant, there is no justification for keeping the Defendant's identity under seal and firm case management deadlines are necessary. Accordingly, the Clerk's office is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents and update the docket and caption to reflect that Defendant is "Ridecoc". Parties must file an initial status report by 2/28/25. A template for the report can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage under "Initial Status Conference and Status Report." A telephonic initial status hearing is set for 3/5/25 at 9:45AM. Attorneys/parties may appear by dialing: 1-650-479-3207 and entering access code: 2311 499 1046. No attendee code is required. Please review in advance the policies governing telephonic hearings that can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage on the court website. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders and want of prosecution. Mailed notice (gel,)

译文:在LaShonda A.Hunt阁下面前的会议记录:原告要求延长提交补充合并备忘录的时间的动议被驳回[11]。作为最初的问题,原告的律师,他们应该熟悉本法院的程序,没有注意到提出的动议。律师进一步提出的任何不合规的文件都将立即受到打击。实质上,所寻求的救济是不适当的,因为法院没有批准(也没有原告要求)许可提交补充合并备忘录。相反,在审查了原告的合并备忘录[9]之后,法院进入了一项命令[10],由于合并不当,驳回了被告2至74,允许案件作为被告1继续进行,并准许原告在2/10/25年2月10日之前提出某些动议。由于原告没有寻求适当的救济来继续起诉剩余的被告,没有理由将被告的身份保密,因此有必要确定案件管理的最后期限。因此,书记办公室被指示解封任何以前密封的文件,并更新摘要和标题,以反映被告是“Ridecoc”。缔约方必须在2/28/25年2月28日之前提交初步状况报告。该报告的模板可在亨特法官的网页上“初始状况会议和状况报告”下找到。电话初始状态听证会定于3/5/25上午9:45举行律师/当事人可以通过拨打:1-650-479-3207并输入访问代码:2311 499 1046来出庭。不需要参与者代码。请事先查阅法院网站上亨特法官网页上有关电话听证的政策。不遵守这一命令将导致不损害不遵守法院命令和不愿起诉的解雇。邮寄通知(凝胶,)

02/10/2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Sebastian Burdon for extension of time for Supplemental Memorandum on Joinder

译文:原告Sebastian Burdon提出的延长合并补充备忘录时间的动议

02/03/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The Court previously entered an order [8] questioning whether Plaintiff had met its burden of establishing that permissive joinder of 74 Defendants in this case was proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Plaintiff was granted leave to file either a supplemental memorandum or an amended Schedule A consistent with that ruling. In response, Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of joinder [9] arguing that various similarities between Defendants support its conclusory allegation that Defendants' actions arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, but the Court remains unconvinced. See Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *3 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024) (finding that plaintiff had merely identified a "small subset of the 181 defendants who are copycats of Plaintiff's style and each other, but that does not make them all partners in collusion) (emphasis in original); Bailie, et al. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 2150, 2024 WL 2209698, at *5 (N.D. Ill. May 15, 2024) (finding use of same images and similar product titles and descriptions insufficient to support joinder); Ilustrata Servicos Design, Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 21 C 5993, 2021 WL 5396690, at * 2 (Nov. 18, 2021) (holding that plaintiff's speculation that defendants were interrelated because they shared notable features "including use of the user name registration patterns, unique shopping cart platforms, accepted payment methods, check-out methods, meta data, illegitimate SEO tactics, HTML user-defined variables, lack of contact information, identically or similarly priced items and volume sales discounts, similar hosting services, similar name servers, and the use of the same text and images" did not support joinder); Bose Corp. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 511, 514 (N.D. Ill. Fed. 19, 2020) (holding that even if defendants were selling the same products and defendants' webpages were identical "that would not overcome the likelihood that Defendants are just copycats" and that an allegation that defendants communicate through chat rooms and website based on "information and belief," without connecting any defendants to such chat rooms or websites, is insufficient to support joinder). Because Plaintiff has failed to cure the misjoinder here, the Court exercises its discretion to do so. Therefore, the Court dismisses Defendants 2 through 74 without prejudice for improper joinder. This action will proceed as to Defendant 1 only. By 2/10/25, Plaintiff may file any motion(s) relating to temporary injunctive relief, electronic service of process, and expedited discovery as to Defendant 1, whose identity shall remain under seal until that date. If no further relief is sought, all previously sealed documents will be unsealed, and the Court will set case management deadlines. Mailed notice (gel,)

译文:在尊敬的LaShonda A.Hunt面前的会议记录:法院先前输入了一项命令[8],质疑原告是否履行了其责任,确立在FED下,74名被告的许可合并是适当的。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)。原告获准提交与该裁决一致的补充备忘录或修正后的附表A。作为回应,原告提交了一份备忘录,支持联合诉讼[9],辩称被告之间的各种相似之处支持其结论指控,即被告的行动源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件,但法院仍然不信服。见维京ARM诉P‘Ships及非法人团体,见附表A,编号24 C 1566,2024年WL 2953105,见*3(N.D.2024年6月6日)(认定原告只确认了181名被告中的一小部分,他们模仿原告的风格并相互效仿,但这并不意味着他们都是串通的合伙人)(强调在原文中);Bailie等人。V.附表A,编号24C2150,2024年WL 2209698,见*5(N.D.IL.2024年5月15日)(发现使用相同的图像和相似的产品名称和描述不足以支持合并);附表A,编号21 C 5993,2021年WL 5396690,at*2(2021年11月18日)(认为原告推测被告相互关联是因为他们有共同的显著特征,包括使用用户名注册模式、独特的购物车平台、接受的支付方法、结账方法、元数据、非法搜索引擎优化策略、超文本标记语言用户定义变量、缺乏联系信息、相同或类似价格的物品和批量销售折扣、相似的托管服务、相似的名称服务器、并使用相同的文字和图像“不支持合并);载于《联邦判例汇编》第334卷,第511,514页(北达科他州伊利诺伊州)的《Bose Corp.诉P‘Ships及非法人团体》一案。美联储。2020年19日)(认为,即使被告销售的是相同的产品,被告的网页也是相同的,“这不能克服被告只是模仿者的可能性”,而且被告通过聊天室和网站进行交流的指控基于“信息和信念”,而没有将任何被告连接到此类聊天室或网站,不足以支持合并)。由于原告未能解决这里的错判,法院行使其自由裁量权这样做。因此,法院以不正当合并为由,在不影响被告2至74的情况下驳回了他们的指控。本诉讼将仅针对被告1继续进行。在2/10/25年2月10日之前,原告可以提交关于临时禁令救济、法律程序文件的电子送达和关于被告1的快速文件透露的任何动议(S),被告1的身份在该日期之前将一直保密。如果没有寻求进一步的救济,所有以前密封的文件将被解封,法院将设定案件管理最后期限。邮寄通知(凝胶,)

01/16/2025

SUPPLEMENT to text entry, [8] Memorandum in Support of Joinder

译文:文本输入的补充,[8]支持合并者的备忘录

附件:
1:Exhibit Exhibit 2
2:Exhibit Exhibit 3
3:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen
4:Exhibit Exhibit 1

01/02/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff names 74 Defendants in this single case and anticipates seeking ex parte TRO relief against each of them. However, after reviewing the complaint [1] and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2); Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). By 1/16/25, Plaintiff must either (a) file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides citations to specific screenshots associated with each Schedule A Defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper; or (b) file under seal an amended schedule A with a subset of Defendants, along with an amended declaration that explains how each of these defendants is properly joined with each other and includes labeled exhibits that contain screenshots or other information specific to Defendants listed on amended Schedule A only. Mailed notice.

译文:在尊敬的LaShonda A.Hunt面前的一分钟记录:原告在这一案件中点名了74名被告,并预计将寻求对他们每一个人的单方面救济。然而,在审查了起诉书[1]和其他文件之后,法院质疑原告是否已确立了将所有被告合并的充分理由。参见FED。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2);北欧海盗ARM诉合伙企业和非法人团体,载于附表A,第24C1566号,2024年WL 2953105(N.D.2024年6月6日)。在1/16/25年1月16日之前,原告必须(A)提交一份补充备忘录,其中提到其备案文件中指控的特定事实,并提供对与每个附表A相关的特定截图的引文,以证明合并是适当的;或(B)将经修订的附表A与部分被告一起盖章提交,连同一份经修订的声明,其中解释每一名被告如何正确地相互结合,并包括带有标签的证物,其中包含仅针对经修订的附表A所列被告的屏幕截图或其他信息。邮寄的通知。

01/02/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for leave to temporarily seal documents [5] was not accompanied by the required notice of presentment. As a one-time courtesy, the Court will consider and grant the motion [5]. For future reference, non-compliant motions will be stricken. Schedule A to the Complaint [2] shall remain sealed until further court order. Mailed notice.

译文:在尊敬的拉桑达·A之前报名参赛。亨特:原告要求暂时密封文件的单方面动议[5]没有附有所需的出示通知。作为一次性礼貌,法院将考虑并批准该动议[5]。为将来参考,不合规的动议将被删除。诉状[2]的附表A应保持密封,直至法院进一步下令。邮寄通知。

12/20/2024

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice.

译文:年度提醒:根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知),任何非政府组织,除个人或独资企业外,必须提交一份声明,列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业,或者,如果该方未确定任何关联企业,则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下:直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交,并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒,当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令,以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问,此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月20日签署:邮寄通知。

12/03/2024

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

译文:秘书通知:根据当地规则73.1(b),该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序,包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序,各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权,包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。

12/03/2024

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

译文:案件分配给尊敬的LaShonda A.亨特。被指定为治安法官Beth W。詹茨。案例分配:随机分配。(民事类别2)。

11/27/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff Sebastian Burdon to seal document sealed document[2]

译文:原告Sebastian Burdon要求密封文件的动议密封文件[2]

11/27/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sebastian Burdon by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr

译文:律师大卫·李·古尔布兰森(David Lee Gulbransen,Jr)为原告塞巴斯蒂安·伯顿(Sebastian Burdon)出庭

11/27/2024

CIVIL Cover Sheet

译文:公民封面

11/27/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Sebastian Burdon Schedule A to Complaint

译文:原告Sebastian Burdon的密封文件投诉附表A

11/27/2024

COMPLAINT filed by Sebastian Burdon; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22778485.

译文:投诉由Sebastian Burdon提交;提交费405美元,收据编号AILNDC-22778485。

附件:
1:Exhibit Exhibit 1

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090