最近更新：2025-03-07
2024-cv-12592 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 01/24/2025 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. to text entry, [23]
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的回应文本输入，[23]
|
| 01/21/2025 | NEW PARTIES: [REDACTED] added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
译文：新当事人：[已删除]已添加到案件标题中。终止附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 01/17/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On review of the complaint and the memorandum in support of Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court raises the propriety of joinder of the 190 Defendants. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) governs permissive joinder of defendants. It permits defendants to be joined in a single action if two conditions are met: (1) "any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions"; and (2) "any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action." Fed. R. Civ. P 20(a)(2); see UWM Student Ass'n v. Lovell, 888 F.3d 854, 863 (7th Cir. 2018). As other courts within this District have held, "it is appropriate for federal courts to raise improper joinder on their own, especially when the sheer number of defendants waves a joinder red flag and ups the chances that the plaintiff should be paying separate filing fees for separate cases. The need for sua sponte evaluation also intensifies when it would take enormous time and effort to check the evidencesuch as screenshots of dozens and dozens of defendants' online storesamassed into a single case absent actual connections between the defendants." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 186 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citing George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007)); see also, e.g., Andrew Blair Bailie v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A," 24-cv-02150 Dkt. 28 (Apr. 24, 2024)). Here, Plaintiff's allegations purporting to establish joinder are merely conclusory. For example, Plaintiff alleges that "[e]-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases share identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the Unauthorized Products offered for sale, establishing that a logical relationship exists between them, and that Defendants' counterfeiting operation arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." R. [1], para. 3. Similar to another court in this District, this Court's "experience has shown that, while some individual defendants may operate several online stores, and while some individual defendants may coordinate with other defendants before or after the filing of the infringement action, rarely, if ever, have all defendants named in a Schedule A case worked together." Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 24-cv-09401 Dkt. 23 (Oct. 18, 2024). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(3) requires that, "factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery." Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiff to file, on or before 01/24/25, a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder, including, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)((3), showing cause why the allegation that "defendants are working in active concert" does not violate Rule 11(b)(3). Instead of the supplemental memorandum, by the same deadline, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with (a) one defendant or (b) a subset of the defendants along with a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Mailed notice.
译文：尊敬的富兰克林·U·瓦尔德拉马面前的会议记录：在审查起诉书和支持原告提出的临时限制令动议的备忘录后，法院提出了190名被告合并的适当性。《联邦民事诉讼规则》第20(A)(2)条规定允许被告合并。它允许被告在满足两个条件的情况下加入单一诉讼：(1)“就同一交易、事件或一系列交易或由同一交易、事件或系列交易而对他们共同、各别或以其他方式主张任何济助权利”；以及(2)“在诉讼中将出现所有被告共同的任何法律问题或事实”。美联储。R.Civ.20(A)(2)页；参见《密歇根大学学生协会诉洛维尔》[《联邦判例汇编》第3集第888卷第854、863页(第七巡回法庭)]一案。2018年)。正如该地区的其他法院所认为的那样，“联邦法院自行提出不正当合并是适当的，特别是当大量被告挥舞着合并红旗，增加了原告应该为单独的案件支付单独起诉费的可能性的时候。当需要花费大量的时间和精力来检查证据时，诉讼自发评估的必要性也加剧了，比如几十个和几十个被告的在线商店的截图被聚集到一个案件中，而被告之间没有实际的联系。”雅诗兰黛·科斯姆斯。有限公司诉合伙企业及非法人团体，载于附表A《联邦判例汇编》第334卷第182、186页(N.D.IL.(引用《乔治诉史密斯》案，载于《联邦判例汇编》第三辑，第507卷，第605,607页(第七巡回法庭2007年))；另见，例如，安德鲁·布莱尔·贝利诉附表“A”所列合伙企业和非法人团体案，24-cv-02150 dkt。28(2024年4月24日))。在这里，原告声称要确立共同诉讼的指控仅仅是结论。例如，原告声称“在卖方别名下运营的[电子商务]商店共享标识符，如提供销售的未经授权产品的设计元素和相似性，从而确定它们之间存在逻辑关系，被告的假冒操作源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件。”R.[1]，第3段.与这一地区的另一家法院类似，本法院的“经验表明，虽然一些单独的被告可能经营几家网上商店，虽然一些单独的被告可能在提起侵权诉讼之前或之后与其他被告协调，但在附表A案件中被点名的所有被告很少--如果有的话--一起工作。”美国丰田汽车销售公司诉附表A所列的合伙企业和非法人团体，24-cv-09401 dkt.23(2024年10月18日)。联邦民事诉讼程序规则11(B)(3)要求，“事实争辩有证据支持，或者，如果明确确定，在有合理的机会进一步调查或发现之后，很可能会有证据支持。”因此，法院指示原告在1月24日或之前提交一份关于合并的适当性的补充备忘录，包括根据FED的规定。R.Civ.P.11(C)((3))，说明“被告正在积极协调工作”的指控不违反规则11(B)(3)的理由。在同一最后期限前，原告可以向(A)一名被告或(B)部分被告提出经修订的申诉，并附上一份备忘录，解释为何这些被告合并是适当的，而不是补充备忘录。邮寄的通知。
|
| 01/14/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[21]
译文：华纳兄弟娱乐公司的备忘录支持杂项救济动议[21]
附件： 1:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 01/14/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的动议根据美联储提供电子流程服务。R. Civ.第4页（f）（3）
|
| 01/14/2025 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Exhibit 1, Parts 1-8 regarding declaration[19]
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的展览附件1，关于声明的第1-8部分[19]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1, Part 8 2:Exhibit 1, Part 7 3:Exhibit 1, Part 6 4:Exhibit 1, Part 5 5:Exhibit 1, Part 4 6:Exhibit 1, Part 1 7:Exhibit 1, Part 2 8:Exhibit 1, Part 3 |
| 01/14/2025 | DECLARATION of Paul Varley regarding memorandum in support of motion[18]
译文：保罗·瓦利关于支持动议的备忘录的声明[18]
附件： 1:Exhibit 2 |
| 01/14/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[17]
译文：华纳兄弟娱乐公司的备忘录支持杂项救济动议[17]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Declaration of Martin F. Trainor |
| 01/14/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的动议适用于签订临时限制令，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制和快速发现
|
| 01/10/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Schedule A regarding amended complaint[14]
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的密封展览关于修改投诉的附表A [14]
|
| 01/10/2025 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Exhibit 1, Parts 1-8 regarding amended complaint[14]
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的展览附件1，第1-8部分关于修改投诉[14]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1, Part 8 2:Exhibit 1, Part 7 3:Exhibit 1, Part 6 4:Exhibit 1, Part 5 5:Exhibit 1, Part 1 6:Exhibit 1, Part 2 7:Exhibit 1, Part 4 8:Exhibit 1, Part 3 |
| 01/10/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. against The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
译文：华纳兄弟娱乐公司的修改投诉针对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
附件： 1:Exhibit 4 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 2 |
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月20日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 12/09/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料
|
| 12/09/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 12/09/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的富兰克林·U。瓦尔德拉马。丹尼尔·P·麦克劳克林（Daniel P. McLaughlin）被指定为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 12/09/2024 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
附件： 1:Exhibit 2:Exhibit 3:Exhibit |
| 12/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. by Alexander Whang
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司律师出庭作者：Alexander Whang
|
| 12/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. by Sydney Paige Fenton
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司律师出庭悉尼·佩奇·芬顿
|
| 12/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. by Martin Francis Trainor
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司律师出庭马丁·弗朗西斯·特雷纳
|
| 12/06/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
译文：华纳兄弟娱乐公司涉及商标的索赔通知
|
| 12/06/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
译文：华纳兄弟娱乐公司根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 12/06/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 12/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的动议允许将某些文件密封归档
|
| 12/06/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的密封展览有关投诉的附表A [1]
|
| 12/06/2024 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Exhibit 1, Parts 1-8 regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告华纳兄弟娱乐公司的展览附件1，关于投诉的第1-8部分[1]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1, Part 7 2:Exhibit 1, Part 6 3:Exhibit 1, Part 5 4:Exhibit 1, Part 4 5:Exhibit 1, Part 1 6:Exhibit 1, Part 3 7:Exhibit 1, Part 2 8:Exhibit 1, Part 8 |
| 12/06/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22812138.
译文：华纳兄弟娱乐公司提出的投诉;备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22812138。
附件： 1:Exhibit 4 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 2 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
