最近更新：2025-04-10
2025-cv-00515 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/18/2025 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：针对被告发出传票（法庭参与者）附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 02/13/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming a single Defendant and thus avoiding any joinder issues. See 13, 14. Based upon Plaintiff's submissions, the Court grants Plaintiff's ex parte motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery and for electronic service of process 15 and strikes the 2/19/25 Notice of Motion date. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）面前提出的起诉书：原告提交了一份修改后的起诉书，指定了一名被告，从而避免了任何合并问题。见13、14。根据原告的陈述，法院批准原告的单方面动议，要求允许进行快速发现并以电子方式送达程序15，并取消了动议通知日期2025年2月19日。邮寄通知。
|
| 02/12/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Anna Melis against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：安娜·梅利斯（Anna Melis）对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会的修改投诉
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 01/21/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this case, Plaintiff sues 200 Defendants for infringement of two copyrighted works, 1, 2. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single copyright infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). In this regard, Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant Internet Stores "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." 1 7, 10, 14. Plaintiff also alleges that "the Infringing Products for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the Infringing Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated." Id. 31. But these allegations, which lump all Defendants together, constitute legal conclusions, which the Court need not accept, given the lack of any factual support. As a result, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to support the joinder of all 200 identified Defendants in this case and dismisses Plaintiff's complaint 1 based upon improper joinder. To the extent Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of 200 Defendants in this single action, it may do so by 2/21/25. If Plaintiff fails to amend, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant; the mere maintenance of a website accessible in Illinois (which is all Plaintiff appears to allege, see 1 2, 15) remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基面前的分钟记录：在本案中，原告起诉200名被告侵犯了两部受版权保护的作品，1，2。只有当针对被告的索赔是针对或引起于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件，并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时，多个被告在一个版权侵权诉讼中合并才是合适的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。在这方面，原告声称被告网店“共享唯一的识别符，如提供销售的未经授权产品的设计元素和相似性，建立了它们之间的逻辑关系，并暗示被告的非法操作源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件。”1 7、10、14.原告还声称“被告网店销售的侵权产品具有相似性和相互关联的标记，表明侵权产品是由共同来源制造的，并且根据信息和信念，被告是相互关联的。”身份证。31.但是，这些将所有被告归类在一起的指控构成了法律结论，鉴于缺乏任何事实支持，法院不需要接受这些结论。因此，法院认为，原告未能支持本案中所有200名确定的被告合并，并驳回了原告基于不正当合并而提出的申诉1。在原告可以根据规则第11条规定的义务修改其诉状以声称事实支持在这一单一诉讼中合并200名被告的范围内，原告可以在2/21/25年2月21日之前这样做。如果原告不作出修改，法院将驳回此案。如果原告选择修改，它也应该支持其关于每个被告的人身管辖权的指控；仅仅维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的网站(这是原告似乎所声称的所有内容，见1 2，15)仍然不足以赋予人的管辖权。见，例如，am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n，Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案，《联邦判例汇编》，第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权)；高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball，Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷，第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”)；Rubik‘s Brand，Ltd.诉附表A，No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668，at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示，伊利诺伊州人可以下单，“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”，“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)邮寄的通知。
|
| 01/17/2025 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.
译文：向华盛顿特区注册员提交的版权报告。
|
| 01/16/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 01/16/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）。玛丽亚·巴尔德斯阁下被指定为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别3）。
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Christopher Romero
译文：克里斯托弗·罗梅罗为原告安娜·梅利斯出庭
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Monica Rita Martin
译文：莫妮卡·丽塔·马丁（Monica Rita Martin）为原告安娜·梅利斯（Anna Melis）出庭
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
译文：卡梅伦·尤金·麦金泰尔（Cameron Eugene Mcintyre）为原告安娜·梅利斯（Anna Melis）出庭
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Adam Grodman
译文：亚当·格罗德曼（Adam Grodman）为原告安娜·梅利斯（Anna Melis）出庭
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Yi Bu
译文：律师卜为原告安娜·梅利斯出庭
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Yanling Jiang
译文：姜艳玲为原告安娜·梅利斯出庭律师
|
| 01/16/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Keith A. Vogt
译文：基思·A·原告安娜·梅利斯（Anna Melis）出庭律师沃格特
|
| 01/16/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 01/16/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anna Melis Schedule A to Complaint 1
译文：原告Anna Melis的密封文件投诉1的附表A
|
| 01/16/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Anna Melis; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22961359.
译文：投诉人：Anna Melis;提交费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22961359。
附件： 1:(Exhibit 4) 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 2 4:Exhibit 1 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
