最近更新：2025-04-09
2025-cv-00495 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/19/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for improper joinder, see [10]. At that time, the Court also observed that Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support the existence of personal jurisdiction as to each of the named Defendants, but granted Plaintiff leave to amend if it could cure the noted deficiencies; the Court indicated that, if Plaintiff failed to amend by 2/12/25, the Court would dismiss the case, id. To date, Plaintiff has failed to amend. Accordingly, consistent with its prior order [10], the Court hereby dismisses this case. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
译文：向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）提出起诉：法院此前驳回了原告关于不当合并的投诉，见[10]。当时，法院还注意到，原告未能声称事实来支持对每位指定被告存在属人管辖权，但如果可以纠正所指出的缺陷，则授予原告修改许可;法院表示，如果原告未能在2/12/25之前进行修改，法院将驳回此案，id。迄今为止，原告尚未进行修改。因此，根据先前的命令[10]，法院特此驳回此案。民事案件终止。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/28/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff seeks to sue 39 separate defendants in this single suit alleging trademark and copyright infringement, see [1], [2]. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). The complaint is largely silent as to joinder; Plaintiff alleges only that "upon information and belief, Defendants are an interrelated group of counterfeiters working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products." See [1] 4. The allegation remains conclusory and insufficient to support joinder. As a result, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint [1] without prejudice. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal [7]. To the extent Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of 39 defendants in this single action, it may do so by 2/12/25. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice.
译文：尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前的会议记录：原告试图在这一单一诉讼中起诉39名独立的被告，指控他们侵犯商标和版权，见[1]，[2]。只有当针对被告的索赔是“关于或产生于同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”，并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时，将多名被告合并在一次侵权诉讼中才是合适的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。起诉书在很大程度上没有提及合并；原告只是声称，“根据信息和信念，被告是一群相互关联的造假者，他们协同行动，在知情的情况下故意制造、进口、分销、提供销售和销售假冒产品。”见[1]4.指控仍属结论，不足以支持合并。因此，最高法院驳回了原告的申诉[1]，不带任何偏见。法院批准了原告的封存动议[7]。在原告可以根据规则第11条规定的义务修改其诉状，以声称支持39名被告在这一单一诉讼中合并的事实的范围内，原告可以在2/12/25年2月12日之前这样做。如果原告不遵守，法院将驳回此案。如果原告选择修改其诉状，它还应支持其关于每个被告的人身管辖权的指控。见，例如，am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n，Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案，《联邦判例汇编》，第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权)；高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball，Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷，第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”)；Rubik‘s Brand，Ltd.诉附表A，No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668，at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示，伊利诺伊州人可以下单，“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”，“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)邮寄的通知。
|
| 01/27/2025 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料发送。
|
| 01/27/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
译文：向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交MASYS商标报告。
|
| 01/27/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基（John Robert Blakey）。被指定为治安法官凯里·L.霍莱布·霍塔林。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 01/27/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Osprey LLC to seal document sealed document[2]
译文：原告鱼鹰有限责任公司要求密封文件的动议密封文件[2]
|
| 01/24/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Osprey LLC by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr
译文：小大卫·李·古尔布兰森（David Lee Gulbransen，Jr）为原告鱼鹰有限责任公司（Osprey LLC）出庭
|
| 01/24/2025 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Osprey LLC
译文：鱼鹰有限责任公司根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 01/24/2025 | USPTO Cover Sheet by Osprey LLC
译文：USPTO封面由Osprey LLC提供
|
| 01/24/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 01/24/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Osprey LLC Schedule A to Complaint
译文：原告鱼鹰有限责任公司的密封文件投诉附表A
|
| 01/24/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Osprey LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22999027.
译文：投诉由鱼鹰有限责任公司提交;提交费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22999027。
附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
