最近更新：2025-04-03
2025-cv-00630 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/10/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal [29], this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
译文：Jeremy C.Daniel法官面前的简短发言：根据驳回通知[29]，本案被无偏见地驳回。民事案件终止。邮寄通知。
|
| 02/07/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to Defendant huayueecomme
译文：戴森科技有限公司自愿解聘被告华悦科姆的通知
|
| 02/03/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: In light of the order entered on 1/30/2025 [27], the Clerk is directed to unseal docket entries [2],[3],[14],[15] and [21]. Mailed notice.
译文：Jeremy C.Daniel阁下面前的记录：根据2025年1月30日的命令[27]，书记官被指示解封备审案件记录[2]、[3]、[14]、[15]和[21]。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/30/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Motion hearing held. The plaintiff's ex parte motion for temporary restraining order 17 is denied. The plaintiff contends that it "has submitted extensive documentation that Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use the same product, namely, that infringes directly and/or directly the Dyson Designs. The documentation submitted by Plaintiff show that an ordinary observer would be deceived into thinking that the Infringing Product was the same as the Dyson Designs." That "extensive documentation" consists of the asserted patent and a screen shot of the accused product. At no point does the plaintiff provide any analysis to explain why an ordinary observer would find the accused product to be substantially the same as the patented design. Nor is there any attempt to highlight the similarities between the two. Perhaps because there are few, if any, non-functional claimed features of the design contained in the accused product. The patent shows a cylindrically-shaped hair styling and hair care apparatus where the base of the primary cylinder includes a patterned or knurled band that extends perhaps a sixth of the way down the cylinder; three buttons arranged in a triangular pattern near the opposite end of the cylinder; a sharp line delineating the last sixth of the primary cylinder; and a narrower cylinder extending from the primary cylinder. (To be clear, this is a description of the figures shown in the patent and not a construction of the claims.) The accused product is also a cylindrically-shaped design with a knurled edge, but the knurling patterns appear distinct. Importantly, there are two buttons on the primary cylinder of the accused product arranged longitudinally (one on top of the other). The different knurled patterns and different arrangement of buttons preclude a finding that the accused product's design is substantially the same as the asserted patent. See PS Prods. Inc. v. Panther Trading Co. Inc., 122 F.4th 893, 898, 99 (Fed. Cir. 2024) ("To establish design patent infringement, a plaintiff must show an 'ordinary observer' would be deceived into believing the accused product is the same as the patented design."). In other words, the plaintiff has not shown that it is likely to show that an ordinary observer would believe the accused product is the same as the patented design. Because the Court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court sees no reason to maintain this case under seal. Therefore, the motion to seal 4 is denied. The same is true for the plaintiff's request for expedited discovery, which is also denied. The plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process 22 is granted. Mailed notice.
译文：请在尊敬的Jeremy C.Daniel阁下面前发言：举行动议听证会。原告单方面提出的第17号临时限制令动议被驳回。原告辩称，其“已提交大量文件，证明被告制造、使用、要约出售、销售和/或进口到美国，以便后续销售或使用同一产品，即直接和/或直接侵犯戴森设计的产品。原告提交的文件表明，普通观察者会被欺骗，认为侵权产品与戴森设计相同。”该“大量文件”包括所声称的专利和被控产品的屏幕截图。原告在任何时候都没有提供任何分析来解释为什么普通观察者会发现被指控的产品与专利设计基本相同。也没有人试图强调两者之间的相似之处。也许是因为被指控产品中包含的设计中几乎没有非功能性的声称特征。该专利显示了一种圆柱形头发造型和护发装置，其中主圆柱体的底部包括一个图案或滚花带，该带可能沿圆柱体向下延伸六分之一；三个按钮以三角形图案排列在圆柱体的另一端附近；一条清晰的线，描绘了主气缸的最后六分之一；以及从主气缸延伸的较窄的气缸。（需要明确的是，这是对专利中所示数字的描述，而不是对权利要求的解释。）被控产品也是一种具有滚花边缘的圆柱形设计，但滚花图案看起来很明显。重要的是，被控产品的主圆柱体上有两个纵向排列的按钮（一个在另一个的顶部）。不同的滚花图案和不同的按钮排列排除了被指控产品的设计与所声称的专利基本相同的认定。请参阅PS产品。股份有限公司诉Panther Trading Co.股份有限公司案，《联邦法院判例汇编》第122卷第893、898、99页（联邦巡回法院第2024页）（“为了确立外观设计专利侵权，原告必须证明‘普通观察者’会被欺骗，相信被控产品与专利外观设计相同。”）。换言之，原告没有表明，普通观察者可能会相信被指控的产品与专利设计相同。由于法院驳回了临时限制令的动议，法院认为没有理由将此案封存。因此，密封件4的动议被拒绝。原告的快速发现请求也是如此，但也被拒绝了。原告要求以电子方式送达传票22的动议获得批准。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/29/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Jennifer Van Nacht
译文：Jennifer Van Nacht为原告戴森科技有限公司出庭
|
| 01/24/2025 | NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for leave to file 4, motion for miscellaneous relief 22, motion for temporary restraining order 17 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 1/30/2025 at 09:30 AM.
译文：Justin R.Gaudio于2025年1月30日上午9:30向Jeremy C.Daniel阁下提交动议通知，要求允许提交第4号文件、第22号杂项救济动议和第17号临时限制令动议。
|
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 23
译文：Justin R.Gaudio关于支持动议23的备忘录的声明
|
| 01/24/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 22
译文：戴森科技有限公司支持杂项宽免动议的备忘录22
|
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司根据《联邦民事诉讼法》提出的电子送达传票动议。第4（f）（3）页
|
| 01/24/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 - Part 1 regarding declaration 20
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司盖章的附件附件附件2-关于声明的第1部分20
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2-1) |
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion 18
译文：Giles Samuel Lane关于支持动议18的备忘录的声明
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 18
译文：Justin R.Gaudio关于支持动议18的备忘录的声明
|
| 01/24/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order 17
译文：戴森科技有限公司支持临时限制令动议的备忘录17
|
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司提出的临时限制令动议，包括临时资产限制和快速发现
|
| 01/23/2025 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MAILED向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交专利报告
|
| 01/23/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 - Part 1 regarding amended complaint[13]
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司盖章的附件附件附件1-关于修改后的投诉的第1部分[13]
|
| 01/23/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint[13]
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司关于修改后的投诉的附表A的密封附件[13]
|
| 01/23/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Dyson Technology Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：戴森科技有限公司对附表A所列的合伙企业和非法人团体的修订投诉
附件： 1:Exhibit 2 |
| 01/22/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 163 defendants. (R. 1 and R. 2.) This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before February 5, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. All pending motions are hereby stayed pending resolution of the joinder issue. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的Jeremy C.Daniel面前简短发言：原告已提起诉讼，指控163名被告侵权。（R.1和R.2）本案遵循“附表a”案件的共同模式，原告声称被告采用类似的方法和“积极一致行动”侵犯原告的知识产权。但经验表明，并非附表a案件中列出的所有被告都能合作。更重要的是，经验表明，根据Fed.R.Civ的合并审理。第20页在附表A的情况下很少适用。因此，法院提出了合并审理的适当性，并要求原告在2025年2月5日或之前提交一份补充备忘录，说明合并审理的正当性。或者，在同一日期之前，原告可以提交一份修改后的起诉书，点名一名或多名被告；然而，如果原告指定了多名被告，原告必须证明将这些被告合并审理是恰当的。在合并诉讼问题得到解决之前，所有未决动议均暂缓执行。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/21/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：书记员通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），本法院的美国治安法官可以主持本次民事诉讼的所有程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼，包括审判、最终判决的输入和所有审判后的诉讼，各方必须在随附的同意书上签字。只有各方签署后，此同意书才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意地方法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 01/21/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1).
译文：案件移交给尊敬的Jeremy C.Daniel。任命尊敬的Keri L.Holleb Hotaling为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民用类别1）。
|
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham
译文：安德鲁·丹尼尔·伯纳姆为原告戴森科技有限公司出庭
|
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph
译文：Justin Tyler Joseph为原告戴森科技有限公司出庭
|
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain
译文：Lawrence J.Crain为原告戴森科技有限公司出庭
|
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio
译文：Justin R.Gaudio为原告戴森科技有限公司出庭
|
| 01/17/2025 | Notice of Claims involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited
译文：戴森科技有限公司涉及专利的权利要求通知书
|
| 01/17/2025 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited
译文：戴森科技有限公司根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 01/17/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：土建封面
|
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司要求允许盖章备案的动议
|
| 01/17/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding complaint 1
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司盖章的附件关于投诉1的附件1
|
| 01/17/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint 1
译文：原告戴森科技有限公司关于投诉1的密封附件A
|
| 01/17/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22971548.
译文：戴森科技有限公司提交的投诉；申请费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22971548。
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
