最近更新：2024-12-25
2024-cv-02228 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 08/23/2024 | DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 8/23/2024. Mailed notice.
译文：尊敬的玛莎·M签署的默认最终判决令2024年8月23日帕卡德。邮寄通知。
|
| 08/23/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: No defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment, 54. The motion, 54, is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded in the amount of $100,000 per defendant, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its copyrights causes it irreparable harm in the form of diminished goodwill and brand confidence, damage to plaintiff's reputation, loss of exclusivity, and loss of future sales; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendant has appeared to argue otherwise. Thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The ten-thousand-dollar ($10,000) surety bond posted by plaintiff is hereby released to plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to plaintiff's counsel, Michael A. Hierl of Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. at Three First National Plaza, 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000, Chicago, IL 60602. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, 31, is denied as moot. Enter Default Final Judgment Order. Terminate civil case. Mailed notice.
译文：Martha M.Pacold阁下的会议记录：没有被告对原告要求记录缺席和缺席判决的动议作出回应，54.这项54岁的动议获得批准。根据提交的支持临时限制令的证据和要求输入失责和失责判决的动议，以及因失责而承认责任，原告已确定侵权行为是故意的，每名被告应获得10万美元的损害赔偿金，并应发出永久禁令。原告已经证明，侵犯其版权会给其造成不可弥补的损害，表现为商誉和品牌信心的下降、原告声誉的损害、独家经营权的丧失和未来销售的损失；金钱损害不足以解决这些损害；永久禁令不会损害公共利益。似乎没有被告提出不同的论点。因此，法院还认为，在困难的平衡下，支持禁制令。原告提交的1万美元(10,000美元)担保保证金特此发放给原告律师。法院书记奉命将先前存放于法院书记官的担保保证书退还给原告律师Michael A.Hierl，他是Hughes Sool Piers Resnick&Dym，Ltd.，地址为Three First National Plaza，70 W.Madison Street，Suite4000，Chicago，IL 60602。原告要求初步禁令的动议，31岁，被驳回，因为没有意义。输入默认的最终判决顺序。终止民事案件。邮寄的通知。
|
| 06/18/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Robert Payton Mcmurray on behalf of Art Ask Agency
译文：Robert Payton Mcmurray代表Art Ask Agency颁发的服务证书
|
| 06/18/2024 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 54
译文：迈克尔·A的声明希尔关于缺席判决动议54
附件： 1:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1) |
| 06/18/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for default judgment 54
译文：Art Ask Agency的备忘录支持缺席判决动议54
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
| 06/18/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A
译文：原告的动议艺术要求代理机构对原告的违约动议做出违约判决以及针对修订后的附表A中确定的被告的违约判决
附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 05/30/2024 | Amended Schedule A by Art Ask Agency
译文：Art Ask Agency修改了附表A
|
| 05/29/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, [50], which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendant No. 43 Litte Leaves. But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 43 Litte Leaves from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. By 5/30/24, plaintiff should file the amended Schedule A form on the docket. By 5/30/24, plaintiff should also submit to the court's proposed order inbox, proposed_order_pacold@ilnd.uscourts.gov, a revised proposed order on plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, [31].
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德：法院已收到原告的自愿驳回通知，[50]，该通知旨在自愿驳回第43号被告Litte Leaves。但第41（a）条并不是驳回部分（但不是全部）诉讼当事人的适当工具。泰勒诉布朗案，787 F.3 d 851，857（第七巡回赛。2015年）（“第41（a）条应仅限于驳回整个诉讼。").因此，法院将原告的自愿驳回通知视为根据规则15（a）（2）修改诉状的许可请求，通过从附表A表格中删除第43号被告Litte Leaves，参见Taylor，787 F.3d at 857-58，法院授予原告修改诉状的许可。24年5月30日之前，原告应在案卷上提交修改后的附表A表格。到24年5月30日，原告还应向法院的拟议命令收件箱proposed_order_pacold@ilnd.uscourts.gov提交针对原告初步禁令动议的修订后的拟议命令，[31]。
|
| 05/20/2024 | Amended Schedule A by Art Ask Agency
译文：Art Ask Agency修改了附表A
|
| 05/16/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Art Ask Agency Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant No. 43 "Little Leaves"
译文：艺术咨询机构自愿解雇通知原告关于第43号被告“Little Leaves”的自愿解雇通知
|
| 05/13/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for a second extension of time to file a reply in support of plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction, [47] is granted. Plaintiff should file its reply by 5/17/2024.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科尔德：原告提出的第二次延长时间以提交答复以支持原告提出的下达初步禁令的动议，未遭到反对，[47]已被批准。原告应于2024年5月17日之前提交答复。
|
| 05/13/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended Schedule A, [46], is granted. Defendants No. 50 NEWCREATAST, No. 53 OMER FARUK TATLI, No. 55 Qinlunuho Resin Mold, No. 69 Suzhou Jumeijia Textile Co., Ltd., No. 72 US-TANG, and No. 76 Wanlong Spring Tree, are dismissed. By 5/20/24, plaintiff should file the amended Schedule A on the docket. By 5/20/24, plaintiff should also submit to the court's proposed order inbox, proposed_order_pacold@ilnd.uscourts.gov, a revised proposed order on plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, [31].
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕卡德：原告要求提交修订后的附表A的动议[46]已获批准。被告No.50 NEWCREATAST、No.53 OMER FARUK TATLI、No.55 Qinlunuho树脂模具、No.69苏州聚美佳纺织品有限公司有限公司，72号US-TANG、76号万龙泉树被驳回。原告应在2024年5月20日之前将修订后的附表A提交到案卷中。到24年5月20日，原告还应向法院的拟议命令收件箱proposed_order_pacold@ilnd.uscourts.gov提交针对原告初步禁令动议的修订后的拟议命令，[31]。
|
| 05/10/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for extension of time Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for a Second Extension of Time to File a Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构延长时间原告提出第二次延长时间以提交答复以支持原告提出初步禁令的动议的未被反对的动议
|
| 05/10/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for leave to file Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Schedule A
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构许可提交原告提出的动议允许提交修订后的附表A
|
| 05/06/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for a first extension of time to file a reply in support of plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction, [44] is granted. Plaintiff's should file its reply by 5/10/2024.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科尔德：原告提出的第一次延长时间以提交答复以支持原告提出的下达初步禁令的动议，未遭到反对，[44]已被批准。原告应于2024年10月5日之前提交答复。
|
| 05/03/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for extension of time Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for a First Extension of Time to File a Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构延长时间原告提出的首次延长时间以提交答复以支持原告提出初步禁令的动议的未被反对的动议
|
| 04/29/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received defendant Little Leaves's opposition [41] to plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [31]. Plaintiff's reply in support of plaintiff's motion is due by 5/3/2024.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德：法院已收到被告Little Leaves对原告初步禁令动议的反对[41]。原告支持原告动议的答复应于2024年3月5日之前提交。
|
| 04/26/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Little Leaves
译文：Little Leaves根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 04/25/2024 | RESPONSE by Little Leavesin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction [31]
译文：Little Leaders反对原告艺术要求机构提供初步禁令的动议的回应原告提出的实施初步禁令的动议[31]
附件： 1:Declaration of Lijuan Wu |
| 04/25/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Little Leaves by Adam Edward Urbanczyk
译文：亚当·爱德华·乌尔班奇克（Adam Edward Urbanczyk）为被告Little Leaves出庭律师
|
| 04/22/2024 | by Art Ask Agency Amended Schedule A
译文：由艺术问答机构修订的附表A
|
| 04/19/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended Schedule A, 34 is granted. Defendants No. 80 XiangJunYunShu and No. 85 YiDingKun are dismissed. By 4/22/24, plaintiff should file the amended Schedule A on the docket. By 4/25/24, plaintiff should submit to the court's proposed order inbox, proposed_order_pacold@ilnd.uscourts.gov, a revised proposed order on plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, 31.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕卡德：原告要求提交修订后的附表A，34的动议已获批准。80号被告向军云舒、85号被告伊丁坤被驳回。原告应在2024年4月22日之前将修订后的附表A提交到案卷中。截至2024年4月25日，原告应向法院的拟议命令收件箱proposed_order_pacold@ilnd.uscourts.gov提交针对原告初步禁令动议的修订后的拟议命令31。
|
| 04/19/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Robert Payton Mcmurray on behalf of Art Ask Agency
译文：Robert Payton Mcmurray代表Art Ask Agency颁发的服务证书
|
| 04/18/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction, 31. The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 31, under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 4/25/2024. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. For the reasons stated in the court's order entering the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date on which the court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). To the extent this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德：法院已收到原告提出的实施初步禁令的动议，31。法院已根据和解提出第31号初步禁令动议，如果在2024年4月25日之前没有被告出庭并提出反对，法院将认为该动议未受到反对。原告应向被告送达本通知。出于法院进入TRO的命令中所述的原因，TRO延长至法院对初步禁令动议作出裁决的日期并包括该日期。见密歇根州H-D，LLC诉希腊免税店SA，694 F.3d 827，843-45（第七环。2012年）。如果这一延期超过了FRCP 65（b）下TRO的最长期限，那么这一延期“实际上成为可上诉的初步禁令，但该命令仍然有效。“ID。844。
|
| 04/18/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Art Ask Agency as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 4/17/2024, answer due 5/8/2024.
译文：艺术询问机构于2024年4月17日返回传票，内容涉及附表A上确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会，答复截止日期为2024年5月8日。
|
| 04/17/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for leave to file Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Schedule A
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构许可提交原告提出的动议允许提交修订后的附表A
|
| 04/16/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
译文：针对被告发出的传票附表A中确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 04/16/2024 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 31
译文：迈克尔·A的声明希尔关于初步禁令动议31
|
| 04/16/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for preliminary injunction 31
译文：Art Ask Agency支持初步禁令动议的备忘录31
|
| 04/16/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构申请初步禁令原告提出的动议
|
| 04/03/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's ex parte motion to extend the TRO 29 is granted. Under Rule 65(b)2), the court finds good cause to extend the TRO for an additional 14 days to prevent defendants from modifying registration data and content, changing hosts, redirecting traffic to other websites in their control, and moving any assets from accounts in U.S.-based financial institutions, including service provider accounts, to offshore accounts. The court's TRO 27 entered on 3/22/24 is extended until 4/19/24.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕考尔德：原告延长TRO 29的单方面动议获得批准。根据规则65（b）2），法院认为有充分理由将TRO再延长14天，以防止被告修改注册数据和内容、更改主机、将流量重定向到其控制的其他网站以及从美国账户中转移任何资产。基于金融机构（包括服务提供商账户）的离岸账户。法院于2024年3月22日提交的TRO 27延长至24年4月19日。
|
| 04/02/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构延长时间原告单方面动议延长临时限制令
|
| 03/26/2024 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Art Ask Agency. (Document not imaged)
译文：Art Ask Agency发布的金额为10，000.00美元的保证金。（文件未成像）
|
| 03/22/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/22/2024:
译文：尊敬的玛莎·M签署的密封临时限制令Pacold于2024年3月22日：
|
| 03/22/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in the motions 7, 10 filed by plaintiff Art Ask Agency, the supporting memorandum 11 and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file certain documents under seal 7 and for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process 10 are granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and the offering of products for sale into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this district have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff genuinely intends to pursue an accounting, but at this preliminary stage, plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Clerk of Court ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), either cash or surety bond, as security.
译文：Martha M.Pacold阁下的会议记录：基于原告Art Ask Agency提出的动议7、10、支持备忘录11和临时限制令中所述的理由，批准了原告关于许可提交盖有印章的某些文件和临时限制令的动议，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制、快速发现和程序10的电子送达。原告的文件支持(暂时)单方面诉讼。具体地说，如果在TRO发布之前告知被告这一程序，很可能会对资产和网站进行重定向，从而破坏原告在识别被告、阻止被告的侵权行为和获取会计信息方面的利益。此外，原告提交的证据显示，根据案情(包括主动侵权和向伊利诺伊州出售产品的证据)胜诉的可能性很大，对原告的伤害是不可弥补的，禁令符合公共利益。诉讼程序的电子送达不违反任何条约，并符合正当程序，因为它有效地将这一诉讼的悬而未决传达给被告。正如这一地区的其他法官所指出的那样，可能有理由质疑这一诉讼中所有被告合并的适当性，以及原告是否真的打算进行会计处理，但在这个初步阶段，原告已经提供了充分的证据表明协调一致的活动和会计处理的前景，以证明对所有被告的请求救济是合理的。有必要加快发现，以确定被告和实施资产冻结。如果任何被告出庭并提出异议，法院将重新审查资产冻结和合并。原告应向法院书记员存放一万美元($10,000.00)现金或担保保证金，作为担保。
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 14 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第14部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 13 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第13部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 12 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第12部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 11 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第11部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 10 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第10部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 9 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第9部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 8 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第8部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 7 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第7部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第6部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第5部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第4部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第3部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第2部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Strid Declaration
译文：原告艺术询问机构的密封文件证据2 Strid声明第1部分
|
| 03/19/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 10
译文：Art Ask Agency支持临时限制令动议的备忘录，10
附件： 1:Declaration Strid Declaration 2:Exhibit Group Exhibit 1 3:Declaration Hierl Declaration 4:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 5:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 6:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3) |
| 03/19/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求代理机构下达临时限制令原告提出的单方面动议，要求下达临时限制令，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制、快速发现以及通过电子邮件和/或电子出版物送达诉讼程序
|
| 03/19/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 03/19/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的玛莎·M。帕尔德。Jeannice W.被指定为治安法官腾。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别3）。
|
| 03/19/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Art Ask Agency
译文：Art Ask Agency根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 03/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Sealed Schedule A
译文：原告艺术询问机构密封的文件密封附表A
|
| 03/19/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
译文：原告提出的动议艺术要求机构密封文件原告要求允许密封提交的动议
|
| 03/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by John Wilson
译文：约翰·威尔逊（John Wilson）为原告艺术问答机构出庭
|
| 03/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by Robert Payton Mcmurray
译文：罗伯特·佩顿·麦克默里（Robert Payton Mcmurray）为原告艺术问答机构出庭
|
| 03/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by William Benjamin Kalbac
译文：威廉·本杰明·卡尔巴克（William Benjamin Kalbac）为原告艺术问答机构出庭
|
| 03/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by Michael A. Hierl
译文：原告艺术问答机构律师出庭迈克尔·A Hierl
|
| 03/19/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 03/19/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Art Ask Agency; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21758083.
译文：由Art Ask Agency提出投诉;陪审团要求。备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-21758083。
附件： 1:(Exhibit Group Exhibit 1) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
