最近更新：2025-04-04
2025-cv-02112 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 03/18/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's Motion to Seal [11] is granted. Mailed notice. (jcc,)
译文：在尊敬的April M.Perry面前简短发言：原告的盖章动议[11]获得批准。邮寄通知。（jcc，）
|
| 03/14/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff P4S, LLC Unredacted Complaint
译文：原告P4S，LLC的密封文件未经编辑的诉状
|
| 03/14/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff P4S, LLC for leave to file documents under seal Renewed Motion
译文：原告P4S，LLC要求允许加盖印章提交文件的动议
|
| 03/14/2025 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff P4S, LLC 1 regarding amended complaint[9]
译文：原告P4S，LLC 1关于修改后的投诉的附件[9]
附件： 1:Ex.3 2:Ex.2 |
| 03/14/2025 | AMENDED complaint by P4S, LLC against John Doe and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
译文：P4S，LLC对John Doe的投诉进行了修改，并终止了附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人团体
|
| 03/04/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff P4S, LLC by Zareefa Burki Flener
译文：Zareefa Burki Flener为原告P4S，LLC出庭
|
| 03/04/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff P4S, LLC by Ying Chen
译文：Ying Chen代表原告P4S，LLC出庭
|
| 02/28/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's Motion to Seal [4] is granted in part. The plaintiff's identity shall not be sealed. The Court raises concern that the plaintiff is attempting to proceed under the pseudonym "P4S." The Seventh Circuit heavily disfavors anonymous, pseudonymous, or "no-name" litigation and requires the plaintiff to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances" that justify a refusal to self-identify. Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 37677 (7th Cir. 2016). "[B]rand owners who seek relief against alleged counterfeiters may be frustrated by the stringent requirements for pseudonymous litigation. But in the absence of a change in binding Seventh Circuit caselaw, changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the creation of an alternative legislative remedy, the current legal framework does not permit pseudonymity without a demonstration of circumstances more exceptional than those presented" in a typical "Schedule A" online counterfeiting case. XYZ Corp. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Sched. A, No. 21- CV-06471, 2022 WL 180151 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2022); see also XYZ Corporation v. Partnership and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2020 WL 6681360 (N.D. Ill., 2020) (noting that in a case with an anonymous plaintiff suing a sealed schedule A, "[t]he public has no earthly idea who is suing whom," and striking the complaint because the plaintiff attempted to proceed anonymously without "request[ing] leave of Court, let alone establish[ing] that 'exceptional circumstances' justify shielding its identity."). The complaint identifies circumstances that are common to all "Schedule A" cases, meaning that the circumstances are, by definition, not exceptional. Accordingly, the plaintiff is directed to file an amended, non-anonymous complaint and to change the pseudonym used on the case caption on CM/ECF to the plaintiff's true identity by 3/7/2025. It appearing that the case filed is a "Schedule A" case, the Plaintiff is also directed to the Court's standing order on its website directing the filing of the Court's Schedule A Template within 14 days. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) of joining 166 defendants to this action. See, e.g, Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). Plaintiff is reminded that "[c]ourts in this district generally agree that alleging that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright in the same way does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find a similar transaction or occurrence." See Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Individuals, Corps, Ltd. Liab. Companies, Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024) (collecting cases). Plaintiff should also reference this Court's opinion in Zaful v. Schedule A Defs., 24-cv-11111, Doc. 12 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 10, 2025), where the Court expressed its views on joinder in such cases. By 3/14/2025, the plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described above. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 3/14/2025 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Mailed notice. (jcc,)
译文：在尊敬的April M.Perry面前简短发言：原告的盖章动议[4]部分获得批准。原告的身份不应被密封。法院对原告试图以化名“P4S”进行诉讼表示担忧。第七巡回法院强烈反对匿名、假名或“匿名”诉讼，并要求原告证明拒绝自我识别的“特殊情况”。Doe诉Deerfield村案，《联邦地区法院判例汇编》第三辑第819卷第372、37677页（第七巡回法院，2016年）。“对涉嫌造假者寻求救济的[B]品牌所有者可能会对匿名诉讼的严格要求感到沮丧。但在具有约束力的第七巡回法院判例法没有改变、《联邦民事诉讼规则》没有改变或没有制定替代立法补救措施的情况下，目前的法律框架不允许在没有证明比典型的“附表a”在线造假案件中更特殊的情况的情况下使用假名”。XYZ公司诉Sched上确定的合伙企业和非法人协会。A、 第21号-CV-06471，2022 WL 180151（伊利诺伊州北达科他州，2022年1月20日）；另见XYZ公司诉附表“A”中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，2020 WL 6681360（N.D.Ill.，2020）（注意到在匿名原告起诉密封附表A的案件中，“公众根本不知道谁在起诉谁”，并驳回了投诉，因为原告试图在没有“请求法院许可的情况下匿名进行，更不用说确定‘特殊情况’有理由保护其身份了。”）。投诉确定了所有“附表A”案件的共同情况，这意味着根据定义，这些情况并不例外。因此，原告被指示在2025年3月7日前提交一份经修订的非匿名投诉，并将CM/ECF案件标题上使用的化名更改为原告的真实身份。看起来提交的案件是“附表a”案件，原告还被指示在其网站上查看法院的常规命令，指示在14天内提交法院的附表a模板。在审查了申诉后，法院提出，根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第20（a）（2）条，将166名被告加入这一诉讼是恰当的。参见，例如，雅诗兰黛化妆品有限公司诉附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，334 F.R.D.182（N.D.Ill.2020）。原告被提醒，“该地区的法院普遍认为，指控多名被告以相同的方式侵犯了同一版权，并不会造成发现类似交易或事件所需的实质性证据重叠。”见Roadget Bus。私人有限公司诉个人，军团，有限公司Liab。附表A中确定的公司、合伙企业和非法人团体，编号23-cv-17036，2024 WL 1858592，第6页（伊利诺伊州北部，2024年4月29日）（收集案例）。原告还应参考本法院在Zaful诉附表A Defs案中的意见。，24-cv-11111，医生。12（N.D.I.C.，2025年1月10日），法院在其中表达了对此类案件合并审理的意见。到2025年3月14日，原告必须根据上述原则提交一份补充备忘录，说明合并诉讼的适当性。在另一种情况下，原告有权在2025年3月14日之前向一小部分被告提交一份修改后的起诉书，并附上一份备忘录，解释为什么每个被告都与其他所有被告正确地结合在一起。邮寄通知。（jcc，）
|
| 02/28/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff P4S, LLC Unredacted Complaint
译文：原告P4S，LLC的密封文件未经编辑的诉状
|
| 02/28/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：书记员通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），本法院的美国治安法官可以主持本次民事诉讼的所有程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼，包括审判、最终判决的输入和所有审判后的诉讼，各方必须在随附的同意书上签字。只有各方签署后，此同意书才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意地方法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 02/28/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable April M. Perry. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文：案件移交给尊敬的April M.Perry。任命尊敬的Daniel P.McLaughlin为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民用类别3）。
|
| 02/28/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff P4S, LLC for leave to file Documents Under Seal
译文：原告P4S，LLC要求允许盖章提交文件的动议
|
| 02/28/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff P4S, LLC by James Edward Judge
译文：James Edward Judge代表原告P4S，LLC出庭
|
| 02/28/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：土建封面
|
| 02/28/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by P4S, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23146751.
译文：P4S有限责任公司提交的投诉；陪审团要求。申请费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-23146751。
附件： 1:Ex.3 2:Ex.2 3:Ex.1 4:Schedule A |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
