2025-cv-02417 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网站

最近更新:2025-04-04
更新案件

2025-cv-02417 AI分析

John Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网站 日期:03/06/2025

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网站 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网站 品牌:匿名起诉

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网站 律所:Saper Law

日期 描述
03/10/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has initiated this copyright, and trademark infringement case against 218 Defendants and seeks to proceed, at least initially, via pseudonym. See [1]. Plaintiff also seeks leave to temporarily seal its complaint, the "Schedule A" listing the named Defendants, and copies of Plaintiff's trademarks, and certificates of copyright registration, [15]. "No-name litigation is disfavored in general, and particularly in this Circuit." XYZ Corp. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 21-CV-06471, 2022 WL 180151, at *12 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2022). The Seventh Circuit has "repeatedly voiced its disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate 'exceptional circumstances' that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Id. (citing Doe v. Vill. of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 37677 (7th Cir. 2016); Doe v. Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005); Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis., 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997)). Here, Plaintiff simply filed its complaint using a pseudonym, without leave, and without any effort to justify the tactic. Yet, many cases just like this are filed every day in this District without anonymous plaintiffs, and the Court has no reason to think that the requested sealing order (which would prevent Defendants from learning that they have been sued) remains insufficient by itself to alleviate any concerns Plaintiff may have about disclosing its identity. Because Plaintiff has failed to identify itself on any of the pending pleadings, the Court dismisses the complaint [1] without prejudice and denies without prejudice the motions for service by publication [13] and for a TRO [9]. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal [15], and, if Plaintiff elects to proceed, it may file an amended complaint under seal. The 3/12/25 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. If Plaintiff elects to pursue an amended complaint and revised motions, it should ensure that its pleadings provide a factual and legal basis to join multiple defendants in a single suit. Plaintiff should also ensure that its submissions support the exercise of personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant; in this regard, the mere maintenance of a website, even a fully interactive website accessible in Illinois, remains insufficient. E.g., Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice.
译文:在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前简短发言:原告已对218名被告提起版权和商标侵权诉讼,并试图至少在最初通过化名继续进行。见[1]。原告还寻求许可暂时封存其诉状、列出被告的“附表A”、原告商标副本和版权注册证书[15]。“一般来说,不支持任何名称诉讼,特别是在本巡回法院。”XYZ公司诉附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人团体,第21-CV-06471号,2022 WL 180151,at*12(伊利诺伊州北部,2022年1月20日)。第七巡回法院“一再表示不赞成当事人匿名诉讼,因为匿名诉讼违背了公众公开司法程序的权利,也违背了公众知道谁在使用由公共税收资助的法院设施和程序的权利。要匿名诉讼,一方必须证明“特殊情况”,这些情况超过了有利于被识别方的公共政策和匿名对对方的偏见。”同上(引用Deerfield的Doe诉Vill.案,819 F.3d 37237677(第七巡回法庭,2016年);Doe诉Smith案,《联邦地区法院判例汇编》第三辑第429卷第706、710页(第七巡回法院,2005年);Doe诉威斯康星州蓝十字蓝盾联合会案,《联邦地区法院判例汇编》第三辑第112卷第869872页(第七巡回法院,1997年)。在这里,原告只是在没有许可的情况下使用化名提出申诉,也没有为这种策略辩护。然而,在这个地区,每天都有许多类似的案件在没有匿名原告的情况下提交,法院没有理由认为所要求的密封令(这将阻止被告得知他们被起诉)本身不足以缓解原告可能对披露其身份的任何担忧。由于原告未能在任何未决诉状中表明自己的身份,法院无偏见地驳回了申诉[1],并无偏见地拒绝了通过公布送达的动议[13]和TRO动议[9]。法院批准了原告的盖章动议[15],如果原告选择继续进行,法院可以提交一份经修改的盖章诉状。所有动议的动议通知日期均为25年3月12日。如果原告选择提出修改后的诉状和修改后的动议,则应确保其诉状为将多名被告合并到一起诉讼中提供事实和法律依据。原告还应确保其意见书支持对每个被告行使属人管辖权;在这方面,仅仅维护一个网站,甚至是一个在伊利诺伊州可以访问的完全互动的网站,仍然是不够的。例如,先进战术军械系统。,LLC诉Real Action Paintball,股份有限公司,751 F.3d 796,803(第七巡回法庭,2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上每个可以访问该互动网站的地方向被告开放个人管辖权。”);Rubik’s Brand,有限公司诉附表A第20-CV-5338号《2021 WL 825668》中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会,第*3页(伊利诺伊州N.D.,2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示,伊利诺伊州人可以下订单,“只不过是维护一个在伊利诺伊州可以访问的互动网站”,“仅凭这一点无法授予个人管辖权”)。邮寄通知。
03/07/2025 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
译文:邮寄给原告律师Lanham调解计划材料
03/07/2025 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文:MAILED向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交商标报告
03/07/2025 NOTICE of Motion by Brandon Matthew Beymer for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order 9, motion to seal document 15, motion for service by publication 13 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 3/12/2025 at 11:00 AM.
译文:Brandon Matthew Beymer动议于2025年3月12日上午11:00在John Robert Blakey阁下面前提交临时限制令9动议、密封文件15动议、通过出版物13送达动议的通知。
03/07/2025 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文:书记员通知:根据当地规则73.1(b),本法院的美国治安法官可以主持本次民事诉讼的所有程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼,包括审判、最终判决的输入和所有审判后的诉讼,各方必须在随附的同意书上签字。只有各方签署后,此同意书才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意地方法官的管辖权,包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
03/07/2025 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文:案件移交给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基。任命尊敬的珍妮丝·阿彭滕为治安法官。案例分配:随机分配。(民用类别2)。
03/06/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Daliah Saper
译文:Daliah Saper为原告John Doe出庭
03/06/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Brandon Matthew Beymer
译文:Brandon Matthew Beymer为原告John Doe出庭
03/06/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe to seal document sealed document, 12, sealed document, 6, sealed document 4, sealed document 3, sealed document 8, sealed document 11, sealed document 2
译文:原告John Doe要求密封文件的动议密封文件12密封文件6密封文件4密封文件3密封文件8密封文件11密封文件2
03/06/2025 MEMORANDUM by John Doe in support of motion for service by publication 13
译文:John Doe支持通过出版物服务动议的备忘录13
03/06/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for service by publication
译文:原告John Doe要求通过出版方式送达的动议
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Declaration of Plaintiff in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
译文:原告John Doe支持临时限制令动议的声明

附件:
1:(Exhibit Exhibit 4F)
2:Exhibit Exhibit 4E
3:Exhibit Exhibit 4D
4:Exhibit Exhibit 4C
5:Exhibit Exhibit 3
6:Exhibit Exhibit 4A
7:Exhibit Exhibit 4B
8:Exhibit Exhibit 2
9:Exhibit Exhibit 1
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Unredacted Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order
译文:原告John Doe的盖章文件,未经编辑的备忘录,支持原告申请临时限制令
03/06/2025 MEMORANDUM by John Doe in support of motion for temporary restraining order 9 Redacted Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order
译文:John Doe支持临时限制令动议的备忘录9支持原告申请临时限制令的修订备忘录
03/06/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for temporary restraining order
译文:原告John Doe提出的临时限制令动议
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Notice of Trademark Claim
译文:原告John Doe商标索赔通知书盖章文件
03/06/2025 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by John Doe
译文:John Doe根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Unredacted Complaint
译文:原告John Doe的密封文件未经编辑的诉状

附件:
1:(Exhibit Schedule A to Unredacted Complaint)
2:Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Unredacted Complaint
3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Unredacted Complaint
4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Unredacted Complaint
03/06/2025 CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文:土建封面
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Schedule A to Redacted Complaint
译文:原告John Doe盖章的文件,修改后的起诉书附表A
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit 2 to Redacted Complaint
译文:原告John Doe的盖章文件——修改后的诉状的证据2
03/06/2025 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit 1 to Redacted Complaint
译文:原告John Doe的盖章文件——修改后的诉状的证据1
03/06/2025 COMPLAINT Redacted Complaint filed by John Doe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23176767.
译文:John Doe提交的已纠正投诉;陪审团要求。申请费405美元,收据编号AILNDC-23176767。

附件:
1:(Exhibit Exhibit 3)

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090