2025-cv-03906 AI分析
07/02/2025
PRELIMINARY Injunction Order. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 7/2/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译
07/02/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 7/2/2025 as to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 30. Defendant failed to appear and failed to otherwise object in response to the TRO or Plaintiff's motion. Accordingly, and based upon the same findings made in this Court's TRO 24, this Court finds that a preliminary injunction is appropriate and warranted, as well as unopposed and grants Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 30. Enter Preliminary Injunction Order. The Court directs the Clerk to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter and directs Plaintiff's counsel to add Defendant to the Court's docket within three business days. Plaintiff may find instructions at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. Plaintiff shall file a status report by 8/15/25 proposing next steps to advance the case. Mailed notice. 翻译
06/18/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Due to the Court's schedule, the 6/25/25 Notice of Motion date for Plaintiff's motion 30 is reset for 7/2/25 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice. 翻译
06/18/2025
SUMMONS Returned Executed by TV Tokyo Corporation as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 6/17/2025, answer due 7/8/2025. 翻译
06/17/2025
NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 30 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 6/25/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译
06/17/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction 翻译
06/09/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion 26 to extend the temporary restraining order entered 5/27/25 24 and strikes the 6/11/25 Notice of Motion date. The Court finds that good cause exists to extend the temporary restraining order, and the order is hereby extended an additional fourteen days, to 6/24/25. Mailed notice. 翻译
06/05/2025
NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of extension of time 26 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 6/11/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译
06/05/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 翻译
05/29/2025
Surety BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by TV Tokyo Corporation. (Document not Imaged) 翻译
05/27/2025
SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 5/27/2025.Mailed notice. 翻译
05/27/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff initially filed a complaint seeking to sue 41 separate defendants in this single trademark and copyright infringement suit, see 1, 8. After the Court dismissed that complaint for failure to allege facts to support joinder, see 14, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming just one Defendant, see 16, 17. Having avoided joinder issues, and having otherwise supported its allegations and demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of its claims, Plaintiff may proceed on its amended complaint 16. Based upon Plaintiff's submissions, the Court grants Plaintiff's motions for leave to file excess pages 18 and for a temporary restraining order 19. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Absent further order, this Temporary Restraining Order shall expire on 6/10/25. The 5/28/25 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. Mailed notice. 翻译
05/22/2025
NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages 18, motion for temporary restraining order, 19 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 5/28/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译
05/22/2025
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation Exhibit 3 to Saiki Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 20 翻译
05/22/2025
MEMORANDUM by TV Tokyo Corporation in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 19 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4)
2:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3
3:Exhibit 2
4:Declaration Hierl Declaration
5:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1
6:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2
7:Declaration Saiki Declaration
8:Exhibit 1
05/22/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication 翻译
05/22/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation 翻译
05/22/2025
AMENDED complaint by TV Tokyo Corporation against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit 2)
2:Exhibit 1
04/22/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this case, Plaintiff seeks to sue 41 separate Defendants for infringement of its trademark and copyright rights. As pled, however, Plaintiff's complaint fails to allege facts to support joinder. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single trademark or copyright infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). In this regard, Plaintiff alleges that "Defendant Internet Stores share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the counterfeit products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences." 1 at 4. Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants' Internet Stores and their counterfeit products are similar in numerous respects, see id. at 22. But these allegations remain conclusory, and the Court thus need not accept them. Moreover, similar websites and goods do not necessarily mean that the Defendants' sales constitute a single series of transactions; rather, it is equally possible that each online retailer set up shop in the same or similar manner. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 188-89 (N.D. Ill. 2020). As a result, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint 1. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of all Defendants in this single action, it may do so by 5/23/25. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant; the mere maintenance of a website accessible in Illinois (which is what Plaintiffs have alleged, see 1 at 5) remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). If Plaintiff declines to amend, the Court will dismiss this case. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal 7 but reminds counsel that, in the future, all motions must be noticed for presentment. Mailed notice. 翻译
04/15/2025
MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable John Robert Blakey for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule IOP 13(f) (1). Mailed notice. (rc 翻译
附件：
1:(Request for Reassignment)
04/10/2025
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
04/10/2025
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译
04/10/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff TV Tokyo Corporation to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 翻译
04/10/2025
COMPLAINT filed by TV Tokyo Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23332981. 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit 2)
2:Exhibit 1
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
