2024-cv-05943 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网

登录
最近更新：2025-05-17
更新案件

2024-cv-05943 AI分析

RCPP v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

重要时间节点
2024-07-17 ：签署临时禁令

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网 日期：07/15/2024

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网 法院：伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网 品牌： RCPP

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网 律所： David


10/01/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal 16, this matter is dismissed without prejudice as to all defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) with each party to bear its own costs and fees. All pending motions, hearings, and deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice

译文：在尊敬的苏尼尔·R之前报名参赛。Harjani：根据原告的自愿驳回通知16，此案被驳回，根据美联储，不损害所有被告。R. Civ.P. 41（a）（1）（A）（i），各方自行承担成本和费用。所有待决动议、听证会和截止日期均被取消。民事案件终止。邮寄通知

10/01/2024

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by RCPP of All Defendants

译文：RCPS自愿解雇所有被告的通知

09/30/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case by 10/9/2024. Mailed notice

译文：在尊敬的苏尼尔·R之前报名参赛。Harjani：原告应在2024年9月10日之前提交一份状态报告，其中包含案件的最新情况。邮寄通知

08/28/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder 11 and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 316 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"); H-D U.S.A. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 780486, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 1, 2021) ("The Seventh Circuit has recognized the broad discretion that district courts have in remedying misjoinder, so long as the court's decision avoids unnecessary harm to the parties."). The Court observes that plaintiff's memorandum includes a fair amount of conclusory language about a logical relationship among all defendants but not much, if any, facts to actually support that relationship. Beyond alleging that the 316 defendants are infringing upon plaintiff's copyrighted works, plaintiff claims generally that joinder is proper because, inter alia, the defendant share similarities such as potential common ownership, geographic operations, methodology in operation, and channels of securing counterfeit goods. Doc. 11 at 7, 8. As support, plaintiff attaches an exhibit showing a sample of the website listings of the counterfeit copyrighted works offered wholesale on 1688.com, which is wholly owned by Alibaba and is a Chinese domestic wholesale website. Doc. 11-3. From this wholesale listing, plaintiff concludes that she "has linked the counterfeit products to the Chinese wholesale website, 1688.com," which "appears to be the common source of many Defendant's counterfeit goods in China." Id. at 9. As a factual matter, plaintiff's conclusion does not follow from the 1688.com counterfeit wholesale listings. It may be that defendants purchase the counterfeit goods from a source other than 1688.com. And even if defendants purchase the counterfeit products "from the same manufacturers at the same markets in the same location in China," as plaintiff alleges, this reveals little about a relationship between all 316 defendants. Id; Viking Arm AS v. P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 2024 WL 2953105, at *3 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024) (the fact that "defendants likely use the same manufacturer to procure certain parts or the same platforms to sell counterfeit products that are distributed through common shipping facilities. are all coincidentally identical facts that reflect the way these internet webstores tend to operate, not that all defendants are part of a network of infringers.") (internal quotes and citation omitted). Next, plaintiff claims defendants are coordinating aspects of product marketing because many of defendants' listings "show the same images or text in the listing, as well as other common characteristics, across listings and for different sellers." Doc. 11-2, ¶ 7. Plaintiff attaches an exhibit which shows three photos, one image for each product, which are shared by 32 defendants, 15 defendants, and 19 defendants, respectively. At most, plaintiff has identified three small subsets of the 316 defendants who are copycats of each other, "but that does not make them all partners in collusion." Viking Arm AS, 2024 WL 2953105, at *3. Moreover, plaintiff provides no specific examples of such shared text or "other common characteristics" across listings and instead the record contains Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Rebecca Coster (which includes 1687 pages of screenshots from defendants' listings) without providing the Court with specific additional information from those listings that might in fact support joinder in this matter. See Docs. 7-3 to 7-14. It is not this Court's job to sift through hundreds of pages of materials to look for a relationship between the defendants. Moreover, "defendants with nearly identical product descriptions may in fact share no ties, with each simply copying the same description from elsewhere." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd., et al. v. The P'ships, et al., No. 20-cv-00845 (N.D. Ill. June 22, 2020) (Lee, J.) (Doc. 40 at 9); see also Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 188. Within its discretion, on this record, the Court finds that plaintiff has failed to meet her burden to show that joining all 316 defendants in this single lawsuit is proper here. See Viking Arm AS, 2024 WL 2953105, at *3 (finding misjoinder in case with 181 defendants); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021) (same for 216 defendants); H-D U.S.A., 2021 WL 780486, at *3 (same for 198 defendants). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 6 and motion to exceed page limitation 9 are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motions for leave to temporarily seal documents [5, 8, 12] are granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others by 9/11/2024. Mailed notice

译文：向尊敬的Sunil R.Harjani阁下提交的会议纪要：法院审查了原告关于第11次合并的备忘录，并在其自由裁量权范围内裁定，原告未能履行其责任，证明在FED的管辖下，316名被告合并在这一问题上是适当的。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)。参见雅诗兰黛·科斯姆斯。见附表A《联邦判例汇编》第334卷第182、185页(N.D.2020年)(注意到“[原告]有责任证明合并是适当的”)；《H-D U.S.A.诉P‘Ships&UnCorporation Ass’n》，附表“A”，2021年WL 780486，at*2(N.D.2021年3月1日)(“第七巡回法院已承认地区法院在补救错合案件方面拥有广泛的自由裁量权，只要法院的裁决避免对当事人造成不必要的伤害。”)最高法院注意到，原告的备忘录包含了相当多的关于所有被告之间的逻辑关系的结论语言，但没有多少事实(如果有的话)来实际支持这种关系。除了指控316名被告侵犯原告受版权保护的作品外，原告一般还声称，合并是正当的，因为除其他外，被告有相似之处，如潜在的共同所有权、地理操作、操作方法以及获得假冒商品的渠道。医生。作为支持，原告附上了一份证物，展示了1688.com上批发提供的假冒版权作品的网站清单样本，该网站由阿里巴巴全资拥有，是一家中国国内批发网站。医生。11-3。根据这份批发清单，原告得出结论，她“将假冒产品链接到中国批发网站1688.com”，该网站“似乎是被告中国许多假冒商品的共同来源”。身份证。9.作为一个事实，原告的结论与1688.com上的假冒批发物品无关。被告可能从1688.com以外的其他来源购买了假冒商品。正如原告所称，即使被告“在中国的同一地点，从同一制造商的同一市场”购买假冒产品，这也几乎没有揭示出所有316名被告之间的关系。ID；Viking ARM诉P‘Ships和非法人团体，见附表A，2024年WL 2953105，at*3(N.D.2024年6月6日)(被告很可能使用相同的制造商采购某些零部件或相同的平台来销售通过公共运输设施分销的假冒产品。碰巧都是相同的事实，反映了这些互联网网店倾向于运营的方式，而不是所有被告都是侵权者网络的一部分。)(省略内部引文和引文)。接下来，原告声称被告正在协调产品营销的方方面面，因为许多被告的清单“在清单中显示了相同的图片或文本，以及其他共同的特征，不同的清单和不同的卖家。”医生。原告附上一份证物，其中展示了三张照片，每种产品一张，分别由32名被告、15名被告和19名被告分享。原告最多只确定了316名被告中的三小部分是彼此的模仿者，但这并不意味着他们都是串通的合伙人。维京ARM AS，2024WL 2953105，at*3.此外，原告没有提供这种共享文本或跨清单的“其他共同特征”的具体例子，相反，记录包含Rebecca Coster声明的附件2(其中包括1,687页的被告清单截图)，而没有向法院提供来自这些清单的具体补充信息，这些清单实际上可能支持在这一问题上合并。请参见文档。7-3到7-14。本法院的工作不是筛选数百页的材料来寻找被告之间的关系。此外，“产品描述几乎相同的被告实际上可能没有任何联系，每个被告都只是从其他地方抄袭相同的描述。”雅诗兰黛·科斯姆斯。有限公司，等人。V.The P‘Ships等人，编号20-cv-00845(N.D.2020年6月22日)(Lee，J.)(DOC.40在9)；另见雅诗兰黛，334 F.R.D.，188。在其自由裁量权范围内，根据这一记录，法院认为原告未能履行她的责任，未能证明在这一单一诉讼中加入所有316名被告是适当的。见维京武装AS，2024WL 2953105，at*3(在181名被告的案件中发现错误连接)；Art Ask Agency诉个人，Corps，Ltd.Liab。公司、P‘Ships及非法人团体，见附表“A”，2021年WL 5493226，见*2(北达科他州2021年11月23日)(216名被告相同)；H-D U.S.A.，2021年WL 780486，at*3(198名被告相同)。因此，原告要求临时限制令6的动议和超过页数限制9的动议被驳回，但不构成损害。批准原告要求暂时封存文件[5、8、12]的动议。原告获准向较小一部分被告提出修改后的申诉，并附上一份备忘录，具体解释为什么每个被告在2024年9月11日之前都能与其他所有被告适当地结合在一起。邮寄通知

08/08/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The joinder issue remains under advisement. Telephone status hearing set for 8/15/2024 is stricken.Mailed notice

译文：在尊敬的苏尼尔·R之前报名参赛。哈贾尼：合并诉讼问题仍在讨论中。定于2024年8月15日举行的电话状态听证会已中断。已邮寄通知

07/31/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff RCPP to seal document sealed document, 11

译文：原告RDPP要求密封文件的动议密封文件，11

07/31/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff RCPP Memorandum in Support of Joinder

译文：原告RDPP支持合并者的密封文件

附件：
1:Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff
2:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen
3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of David Gulbransen
4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration of David Gulbransen
5:Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Declaration of David Gulbransen
6:(Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Declaration of David Gulbransen)

07/18/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motions for leave to seal and temporarily proceed pseudonymously [5, 8], plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 6, and plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation 9 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of over 315 defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 8/1/2024, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. A telephone status hearing is set for 8/15/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice

译文：在尊敬的Sunil R.Harjani面前的会议记录：原告要求假名盖章和临时进行的许可动议[5，8]，原告要求临时限制令6的动议，以及原告超过页面限制9的动议被登录并继续进行。在审查了申诉和临时提交的材料后，法院提出了该案中315多名被告合并的所有权。例如，见《雅诗兰黛化妆品有限公司诉附表A》，载于《联邦判例汇编》第334卷，第182页(N.D.2020)。在2024年8月1日之前，原告应提交一份补充备忘录，根据雅诗兰黛中描述的原则处理合并的适当性。在另一种情况下，原告有权向较小一部分被告提出修改后的申诉，并附上一份备忘录，具体解释为什么每个被告都正确地与所有其他被告结合在一起。雅诗兰黛，334 F.R.D.，189号。电话状态听证会定于2024年8月15日上午9点15分举行。公众和媒体将能够打电话来收听这次听证会，但将被设置为静音。电话号码是(855)244-8681，访问代码是172 628 1276##。对获准远程观看诉讼程序的人提醒，一般禁止对法庭程序进行摄影、录音和转播。邮寄通知

07/17/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff RCPP for leave to file excess pages

译文：原告RDPP请求允许提交多余页面的动议

07/17/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff RCPP to seal document sealed document, 7

译文：原告RDPP要求密封文件的动议密封文件，7

07/17/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff RCPP Memorandum in Support of Motion for TRO

译文：原告支持TRO动议的RDPP备忘录密封文件

附件：
1:Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff
2:Exhibit Exhibit 1
3:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (1 of 12)
4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (2 of 12)
5:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (3 of 12)
6:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (4 of 12)
7:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (5 of 12)
8:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (6 of 12)
9:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (7 of 12)
10:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (8 of 12)
11:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (9 of 12)
12:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (10 of 12)
13:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (11 of 12)
14:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff Declaration (12 of 12)
15:(Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen)

07/17/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff RCPP for temporary restraining order

译文：原告RDPP提出的临时限制令动议

07/15/2024

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。

07/15/2024

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

译文：案件分配给尊敬的Sunil R.哈贾尼。被指定为治安法官凯里·L.霍莱布·霍塔林。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别3）。

07/15/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff RCPP to seal document sealed document 2

译文：原告RDPP要求密封文件的动议密封文件2

07/15/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff RCPP by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr

译文：小大卫·李·古尔布兰森（David Lee Gulbransen，Jr）为原告RDPP出庭

07/15/2024

CIVIL Cover Sheet

译文：公民封面

07/15/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff RCPP Complaint, Ex. 1, and Schedule A

译文：原告RDPP投诉的密封文件，例如。1和附表A

附件：
1:Exhibit Exhibit 1
2:(Appendix Schedule A)

07/15/2024

COMPLAINT filed by RCPP; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22243219.

译文：RDPP提交的投诉;提交费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22243219。

案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。

诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


联系我们

联系电话：18523047090
扫码咨询：TRO和解，应诉，组团和解，缺席/划扣追款，店铺申述，全球知识产权全链条服务

律所相关案件

2026-cv-01958 02/21/2026

Wacom Co., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01909 02/20/2026

Zhenbiao Zhang v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01939 02/20/2026

Stussy, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01899 02/20/2026

Shanxi Hefan Science and Trade Co., LTD v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

2026-cv-01896 02/19/2026

Lily & Val, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01935 02/20/2026

ABB Merchandising Co., Inc. v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,

2026-cv-01860 02/19/2026

Wayne Cimperman v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

2026-cv-01866 02/19/2026

Maui and Sons v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

2026-cv-01865 02/19/2026

Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01773 02/18/2026

Zhang Zhenbiao v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A

品牌相关案件

2026-cv-01958 02/21/2026

Wacom Co., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01909 02/20/2026

Zhenbiao Zhang v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01939 02/20/2026

Stussy, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01899 02/20/2026

Shanxi Hefan Science and Trade Co., LTD v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

2026-cv-01896 02/19/2026

Lily & Val, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01935 02/20/2026

ABB Merchandising Co., Inc. v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,

2026-cv-01860 02/19/2026

Wayne Cimperman v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

2026-cv-01866 02/19/2026

Maui and Sons v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

2026-cv-01865 02/19/2026

Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

2026-cv-01773 02/18/2026

Zhang Zhenbiao v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A

友情链接

61工具网
下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090