2025-cv-09187 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网

最近更新:2025-11-02
更新案件

2025-cv-09187 AI分析

Bragin v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网 日期:08/04/2025

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网 品牌: 骷髅面具

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网 律所: David

起诉文件:点击查看


10/26/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's memorandum in support of joinder of over 100 Defendants [15]. Plaintiff claims joinder is proper because "[t]he Defendants here share more than simply infringing the same Works; the evidence available to the Plaintiff at this juncture suggests that many of the online sellers share a number of operative facts: potential common ownership of accounts, common geographic operations, similar methodology in operation, and similar channels of securing counterfeit goods[.]" R. 15 at 7. For the reasons stated in the Court's order dismissing this case for misjoinder [12], these reasons are insufficient to establish the propriety of joinder. See also Toyota Motor Sales, 24-cv-09401 Dkt. 23 at 3 (analogizing Schedule A Defendants to vendors outside of a concert selling counterfeit t-shirts: "These vendors had the same profile. They sold the same merchandise. They used the same tactics to try to get attention. Two of them even offered similar deals ('two for $30'). One could even argue that they 'swarmed' the concert venue that evening. But that does not establish a logical relationship between them," "even if the t-shirts came from the same factory, and even if the unauthorized vendors employed the same hustle.") (cleaned up). And although Plaintiff argues that it will be more economical for the Court to allow joinder here, the Court cannot circumvent the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 for its own convenience. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint remains dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. By 11/07/2025, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint naming one defendant. If Plaintiff's amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must submit a memorandum along with sufficient documentary evidence in support of joinder under Rule 20. Mailed notice. 翻译

10/07/2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin Memorandum in Support of Joinder 翻译

09/17/2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file his memorandum in support of joinder [13] is granted. Plaintiff shall file his memorandum no later than 10/06/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译

09/16/2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for extension of time to file Memorandum in Support of Joinder 翻译

09/06/2025

ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. Enter Order. By 09/22/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. The following motions are denied as moot: (1) Plaintiff's motion to seal [5]; (2) Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order [7]; (3) Plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation [10]; (4) Plaintiff's motion to seal [11]. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 9/6/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译

08/26/2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin to seal document sealed document, [9] 翻译

08/26/2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for leave to file excess pages 翻译

08/26/2025

AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin in Support of MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for temporary restraining order [7] 翻译


附件:
1:Exhibit Exhibit 1
2:Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff
3:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen

08/26/2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin for temporary restraining order 翻译

08/05/2025

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译

08/04/2025

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译

08/04/2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). 翻译

08/04/2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin to seal document sealed document[2] 翻译

08/04/2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr 翻译

08/04/2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译

08/04/2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dmytriy Bragin Schedule A to Complaint 翻译

08/04/2025

COMPLAINT filed by Dmytriy Bragin; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23834793. 翻译


附件:
1:Exhibit Exhibit 1

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090