2025-cv-09559 AI分析
08/28/2025
MAILED Patent report with certified copy of minute order dated 08/27/25 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (bi,) 翻译
08/27/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: On 8/19/25, this Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 8/26/25 "specifically naming and identifying each defendant being sued and setting forth with more than conclusory statements the alleged infringing activity" and warning that failure to do so would result in the current complaint being dismissed [10]. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the current complaint [1] is dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed. All pending deadlines are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译
08/19/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Plaintiff filed this patent infringement case naming 24 defendants under seal along with a motion for leave to seal 5 and a motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order with a temporary injunction, asset restraint, and expedited discovery 6. Plaintiff also filed over 1500 pages of attachments to the complaint 9, also under seal. But this Court, like so many of my colleagues, remains unconvinced that "these commonplace efforts in Schedule A cases to obtain secret relief comport with principles of procedural due process." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025)(Kness, J.) As an initial matter, these infringement cases rarely present exceptional circumstances that would justify sealing the names of all defendants and documents pertaining to their alleged infringing activity, let alone an entire case, even temporarily. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation is to protect rightholders' IP interests by obtaining an injunction against defendants' sales of infringing or counterfeit goods." Id. More importantly, this presumption of sealing runs counter to the well-established authority of this Circuit holding that "[m]any a litigant would prefer that the subject matter of a case. be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing." See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000). It is not enough that alleged counterfeiters might quickly shut down the online store and move money if alerted to the fact that they are being sued. Due process still affords them the right to receive notice and a chance to present a defense before restraining all of their assets based solely on one-sided documentary evidence from Plaintiff. Absent a detailed explanation to establish good cause for sealing in accordance with Local Rule 26.2 and Seventh Circuit precedentwhich has not been provided heresealing is not appropriate. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to seal 5 is denied, and the Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the entire case, forthwith. Turning to Plaintiff's combined motion for injunctive relief and expedited discovery, Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant such ex parte relief. Indeed, Plaintiff fails to submit a single supporting affidavit with "specific facts" to "clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result" along with a certification from counsel. That alone is reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors Ltd., 2025 WL 2299593 at *4-7. The combined motion 6 is denied without prejudice. Finally, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 24 defendants under 35 U.S.C. § 299. Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations on "information and belief" about coordinated counterfeiting activity between defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. Accordingly, by 8/26/25, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint specifically naming and identifying each defendant being sued and setting forth with more than conclusory statements the alleged infringing activity. Failure to do so will result in the current complaint being dismissed without prejudice and this case being closed. Mailed notice 翻译
08/12/2025
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co. LTD. 翻译
08/12/2025
COMPLAINT filed by Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co. LTD.; (Received at intake 08/12/2025.) 翻译
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
