最近更新：2025-02-20
2024-cv-07765 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/03/2025 | CERTIFICATE of Service by William Benjamin Kalbac on behalf of Sega Corporation
译文：William Benjamin Kalbac代表世嘉公司颁发的服务证书
|
| 02/02/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 35 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 2/7/2025." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the temporary restraining order ("TRO") 30, as well as in Plaintiff's motion 31 to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice
译文：约翰·F·凯内斯法官面前的会议记录：法院面前是原告提出的关于生效初步禁令的第35号动议。关于这项已登录并继续进行的动议，原告必须立即向所有被告送达以下陈述：“法院已在知情的情况下受理了初步禁制令的动议，如果在2025年2/7或之前没有被告出庭并提出反对，法院将考虑无人反对的动议。”原告必须在两个工作日内提交法院陈述的送达证明。基于法院发出并延长临时限制令的命令30，以及原告关于延长临时限制令的第31号动议所述的理由，临时限制令进一步延展至并包括法院裁决初步强制令动议的日期。参见《密歇根州H-D公司诉希腊免税店S.A.》[《联邦判例汇编》第3集第694卷第827、843-45页(第七巡回法庭)]一案。2012年)。由于这一延期超过了FRCP 65(B)规定的TRO的最长期限，因此这一延期“实际上成为了一项可上诉的初步禁令，但该命令仍然有效”。身份证。在844。邮寄通知
|
| 01/30/2025 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sega Corporation as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 1/29/2025, answer due 2/19/2025.
译文：世嘉公司于2025年1月29日退回传票，涉及附表A上确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会，答复截止日期为2025年2月19日。
|
| 01/29/2025 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 35
译文：迈克尔·A的声明希尔关于初步禁令动议35
|
| 01/29/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Sega Corporation in support of motion for preliminary injunction 35
译文：世嘉公司支持初步禁令动议的备忘录35
|
| 01/29/2025 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
译文：针对被告发出的传票附表A中确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 01/29/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sega Corporation for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
译文：原告世嘉公司提出的初步禁令动议原告提出的初步禁令动议
|
| 01/21/2025 | ORDER TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 1/21/2025. Mailed notice.
译文：约翰·F·阁下签署的延长临时限制令的命令Kness于2025年1月21日。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/21/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 31 is granted. Enter separate order. Mailed notice.
译文：向尊敬的约翰·F·F·前提交参赛作品。Kness：原告延长临时限制令31的动议获得批准。输入单独的顺序。邮寄通知。
|
| 01/14/2025 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Sega Corporation, Atlus Co., Ltd.
译文：世嘉公司、Atlus Co.、公司
|
| 01/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sega Corporation for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告世嘉公司提出的延期动议原告单方面提出的延长临时限制令的动议
|
| 01/06/2025 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 1/6/2025.
译文：约翰·F·阁下签署的密封临时限制令Kness于2025年1月6日发布。
|
| 01/06/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file under seal [7], motion for leave to file excess pages [10], and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order [11], which includes a motion for electronic service of process, are granted in part. Plaintiffs' submissions (e.g., Dkt. 12-1 at 47) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiffs' requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiffs may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries [8] and [13][23]. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, the Court holds, dubitante, that Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). (This holding is subject to reconsideration in future "Schedule A" cases.) Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiffs' interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining the equitable accounting that, at this point, Plaintiffs state that they may pursue. These facts justify, among other relief, the imposition of a prejudgment asset restraint against Defendants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per separate account. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiffs' trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiffs is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit and infringing goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of joining all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiffs will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiffs assert as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiffs have provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice.
译文：约翰·F·凯内斯阁下面前的会议记录：原告要求允许加盖印章存档的动议[7]、允许提交多余页数的动议[10]和要求临时限制令的单方面动议[11]，其中包括电子送达法律程序文件的动议。原告提交的材料(例如，Dkt.12-1在47)确定，如果被告在执行原告请求的初步禁令救济之前得知这些程序，被告有很大的风险可能销毁相关的书面证据，并隐藏或转移法院无法触及的资产。因此，只要在适当的时间开封，原告现在可以将动议中确定的盖章并出现在摘要条目[8]和[13][23]上的文件加盖印章。与本会议记录一起登录的临时限制令也应加盖印章。此外，就上述动议而言，法院认为，原告的申请暂时支持根据《宪法》第65(B)(1)条单方面提起诉讼。(在未来的“附表A”案件中，这一持有可能会受到重新考虑。)具体地说，如上所述，如果被告在TRO可以发布之前被告知这一程序，很可能会改变资产和网站的方向，从而破坏原告在确定被告、阻止被告的侵权行为以及获得原告在这一点上可能寻求的衡平法会计方面的利益。这些事实证明，除其他救济外，对被告施加预判资产限制，每个单独账户的金额不超过50,000美元。此外，最高法院认定，至少就目前而言，在这份有限而片面的记录中，在不影响重新讨论这一问题的情况下，法院对被告拥有个人管辖权，因为他们直接针对包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国消费者的商业活动。具体地说，被告通过建立和经营电子商务商店，以使用一个或多个卖家化名的美国消费者为目标，向包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国提供送货服务，接受美元付款，并使用侵权和假冒原告商标的版本向伊利诺伊州居民销售产品，从而瞄准了伊利诺伊州居民的销售目标。提交给法院的证据还表明，原告根据案情(包括主动侵权和向伊利诺伊州销售的证据)证明了胜诉的可能性，对原告的伤害是不可弥补的，并且禁令符合公共利益。由于假冒和侵权商品造成消费者困惑，禁令服务于公共利益，而指示被告停止侵权的命令并不会对他们造成相反的伤害。诉讼程序的电子送达不违反任何条约，并符合正当程序，因为它有效地将这一诉讼的悬而未决传达给被告。正如几名法官以前指出的那样，可能有理由质疑将所有被告加入这一诉讼的适当性，以及原告是否会进行会计核算(原告声称这是冻结资产的理由)，但在这个初步阶段，法院相信，原告已经提供了充分的证据，表明协调活动和会计核算的可能性，以证明对所有被告请求的救济是合理的。有必要加快发现，以确定被告和实施资产冻结。如果任何被告出庭并提出反对，法院将重新考虑资产冻结和合并。进入密封的临时限制令。邮寄的通知。
|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 08/29/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable John F. Kness for all further proceedings pursuant to IOP 13(f)(2)(b). Mailed notice
译文：向执行委员会提出申请：案件重新分配给尊敬的约翰·F。根据IOC 13（f）（2）（b）进行所有进一步程序的Kness。邮寄通知
附件： 1:(Request for Reassignment) |
| 08/29/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料
|
| 08/29/2024 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
|
| 08/28/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation
译文：Atlus Co.关于涉及商标的索赔通知，有限公司，世嘉公司
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 11 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第11部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 10 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第10部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 9 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第9部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 8 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第8部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 7 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第7部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第6部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第5部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第4部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第3部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第2部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Paragoso Declaration
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司附件2 Paragoso声明第1部分
|
| 08/28/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 11
译文：备忘录作者：Atlus Co.，有限公司，世嘉公司支持临时限制令动议，11
附件： 1:Declaration Paragoso Declaration 2:Exhibit 1 3:Declaration Hierl Declaration 4:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 5:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 6:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3 7:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4) |
| 08/28/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
译文：原告Atlus Co.提出的动议，有限公司，世嘉公司申请临时限制令原告单方面申请临时限制令，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制、快速发现以及通过电子邮件和/或电子出版物提供处理服务
|
| 08/28/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
译文：原告Atlus Co.提出的动议，有限公司，世嘉公司请求提交多余页面原告提出的超过页面限制的动议
|
| 08/28/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 08/28/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的玛丽·M。罗兰。被指定为治安法官凯里·L.霍莱布·霍塔林。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别3）。
|
| 08/28/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation
译文：Atlus Co.根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司，有限公司，世嘉公司
|
| 08/28/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation Sealed Schedule A
译文：原告Atlus Co.的密封文件，有限公司，世嘉公司密封附表A
|
| 08/28/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
译文：原告Atlus Co.提出的动议，有限公司，世嘉公司将密封原告要求允许提交的文件
|
| 08/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation by John Wilson
译文：原告律师出庭Atlus Co.，有限公司，约翰·威尔逊（John Wilson）的世嘉公司
|
| 08/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation by Robert Payton Mcmurray
译文：原告律师出庭Atlus Co.，有限公司，罗伯特·佩顿·麦克默里（Robert Payton Mcmurray）的世嘉公司
|
| 08/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation by William Benjamin Kalbac
译文：原告律师出庭Atlus Co.，有限公司，威廉·本杰明·卡尔巴克（William Benjamin Kalbac）的世嘉公司
|
| 08/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Atlus Co., Ltd., Sega Corporation by Michael A. Hierl
译文：原告律师出庭Atlus Co.，有限公司，迈克尔·A·世嘉公司Hierl
|
| 08/28/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 08/28/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Sega Corporation, Atlus Co., Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22411022.
译文：投诉由世嘉公司、Atlus Co.、有限公司;陪审团需求。备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22411022。
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
