2024-cv-12180 - 案件详情 - 61TRO案件查询网

最近更新:2025-05-17
更新案件

2024-cv-12180 AI分析

Atelier Eumori v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

重要时间节点
2024-12-05 :签署临时禁令

日期 - 61TRO案件查询网 日期:11/26/2024

法院 - 61TRO案件查询网 法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌 - 61TRO案件查询网 品牌: Atelier Eumori 社交心情电池及插画

律所 - 61TRO案件查询网 律所: David

起诉文件:点击查看


12/20/2024

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice.

译文:年度提醒:根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知),任何非政府组织,除个人或独资企业外,必须提交一份声明,列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业,或者,如果该方未确定任何关联企业,则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下:直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交,并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒,当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令,以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问,此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月20日签署:邮寄通知。

12/27/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff having declined to amend, the Court hereby dismisses this case. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

译文:向尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基(John Robert Blakey)提交的临时条目:原告拒绝修改,法院特此驳回此案。民事案件终止。邮寄通知。

12/22/2024

MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.

译文:MASYS向华盛顿特区注册员提交的版权报告。

附件:
1:(List of Copyrights)

12/10/2024

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has filed a complaint which seeks to sue 43 separate defendants for copyright infringement in connection with three separate works, see [1], [1-1], [2]. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single copyright infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). In this regard, Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant Internet Stores "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between them and suggesting that Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences. [1] 8, 10. Plaintiff also alleges that the "Infringing Products for sale in the Defendant Internet Stores bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the Infringing Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, Defendants are interrelated. The Defendant Internet Stores also include other notable common features, including use of the same Defendant Internet Store registration patterns, unique shopping cart platforms, accepted payment methods, check-out methods, meta data, illegitimate SEO tactics, HTML user-defined variables, lack of contact information, identically or similarly priced items and volume sales discounts, similar hosting services, similar name servers, and the use of the same text and images. Id. 22. These allegations remain conclusory, and they are belied by the screenshot evidence submitted by Plaintiff, which shows that, although some of the sellers do appear to use identical layouts, reviews, descriptions, images, etc., many do not. For example, although a couple of the sellers offering one particular infringing product use the same photos, see, e.g., [8] at 7-13, and some of the sellers offering other infringing products use common, but different photos and display common reviews, see, e.g., [8] at 24-49, the submissions provide no basis to connect the two groups of sellers. Additionally, it appears that several of the seller's products may not even infringe Plaintiff's copyright, see, e.g., [8] at 84, 87; [8-1] at 56-70. These submissions thus undermine Plaintiff's allegations concerning joinder, and they also undermine any claimed likelihood of success on the merits. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint [1] and denies Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [6]. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to cure the defects discussed above, it may file an amended complaint by 12/24/24. The Court grants Plaintiff's motions to seal [5], [10] and denies as moot Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages [9]. The 12/11/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant; the mere maintenance of a website accessible in Illinois remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice

译文:在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前的分钟记录:原告已提起诉讼,寻求起诉43名独立被告与三部独立作品有关的版权侵权行为,见[1]、[1-1]、[2]。只有当针对被告的索赔是“关于或产生于同一交易、事件或一系列交易或事件”,并且对所有被告都存在共同的法律或事实问题时,将多名被告合并到一个侵犯版权的诉讼中才是合适的。美联储。R.Civ.P.20(A)(2)(A)-(B)。在这方面,原告声称被告网店“共享唯一的识别符,如提供销售的未经授权产品的设计元素和相似性,建立了它们之间的逻辑关系,并暗示被告的非法经营源于相同的交易、事件或一系列交易或事件。[1]8、10.原告还声称,”被告网店销售的侵权产品具有相似之处和相互关联的标记,表明侵权产品是由共同来源制造的,并且根据信息和信念,被告是相互关联的。被告网店还包括其他显著的共同特征,包括使用相同的被告网店注册模式、独特的购物车平台、接受的支付方式、结账方式、元数据、非法的SEO策略、HTML用户定义变量、缺少联系信息、相同或类似价格的商品和批量销售折扣、类似的托管服务、相似的名称服务器以及使用相同的文本和图像。身份证。22.这些指控仍然是个未知数,原告提交的截图证据也证明了这一点,这些证据表明,尽管一些卖家似乎使用了相同的布局、评论、描述、图片等,但许多卖家并非如此。例如,尽管提供一个特定侵权产品的几个卖家使用相同的照片,例如见7-13处的[8],而提供其他侵权产品的一些卖家使用共同的但不同的照片并显示共同的评论,例如见24-49处的[8],提交的材料没有提供将这两组卖家联系起来的基础。此外,卖方的一些产品似乎甚至不会侵犯原告的版权,见[8](84,87);[8-1](56-70)。因此,这些提交的材料削弱了原告关于合并的指控,也削弱了任何声称的根据案情胜诉的可能性。因此,法院驳回了原告的申诉[1],并驳回了原告要求临时限制令的动议[6]。如果原告能够按照规则第11条规定的义务修改其诉状,以纠正上述缺陷,它可以在12/24/24之前提出修改后的诉状。法院批准了原告要求加盖印章的动议[5]、[10],并驳回了原告关于许可提交多余页数的动议[9]。所有议案均以12/11/24动议预告日期为准。如果原告选择修改其诉状,它还应该支持其关于每个被告的个人管辖权的指控;仅仅维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的网站仍然不足以赋予个人管辖权。见,例如,am新娘和舞会印度河。Asn‘n,Inc.诉附表A所列合伙企业及非法人团体案,《联邦判例汇编》,第192页。3D924,93435(北伊利诺伊州(仅通过互动网站声称存在据称的造假本身不足以授予个人管辖权);高级战术武器系统公司诉Real Action Paintball,Inc.[参见《联邦判例汇编》第3集第751卷,第796,803页(第七巡回法庭)]。2014年)(“拥有一个互动网站。不应在地球上该互动网站可访问的每一个地点向被告开放个人管辖权。”);Rubik‘s Brand,Ltd.诉附表A,No.20-CV-5338,2021年WL 825668,at*3(N.D.ill.2021年3月4日)(截图证据显示,伊利诺伊州人可以下单,“无异于维护一个可在伊利诺伊州访问的互动网站”,“仅凭这一点并不能授予个人管辖权”。)邮寄通知

12/09/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atelier Eumori by Stephen Jay Judge

译文:斯蒂芬·杰伊·贾奇(Stephen Jay Judge)为原告Atelier Eumori出庭

12/05/2024

NOTICE of Motion by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order[6], motion for leave to file excess pages[9], motion to seal document[10], motion to seal document[5] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/11/2024 at 11:00 AM.

译文:David Lee Gulbransen,Jr提出的动议通知,要求在尊敬的John Robert Blakey面前提交临时限制令动议[6]、允许提交多余页面的动议[9]、密封文件的动议[10]、密封文件的动议[5] 2024年11月12日上午11:00。

12/05/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff Atelier Eumori to seal document sealed document[8]

译文:原告Atelier Eumori要求密封文件的动议密封文件[8]

12/05/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff Atelier Eumori for leave to file excess pages

译文:原告Atelier Eumori提出请求提交多余页面的动议

12/05/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Atelier Eumori Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff

译文:原告Atelier Eumori的密封文件原告声明的附件2

12/05/2024

MEMORANDUM by Atelier Eumori in support of motion for temporary restraining order[6]

译文:Atelier Eumori的备忘录支持临时限制令动议[6]

附件:
1:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen
2:Exhibit Exhibit 1
3:Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff

12/05/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff Atelier Eumori for temporary restraining order

译文:原告Atelier Eumori提出临时限制令动议

11/26/2024

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

译文:秘书通知:根据当地规则73.1(b),该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序,包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序,各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权,包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。

11/26/2024

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

译文:案件分配给尊敬的约翰·罗伯特·布莱基(John Robert Blakey)。尊敬的杰弗里·T被指定为治安法官。吉尔伯特案例分配:随机分配。(民事类别3)。

11/26/2024

MOTION by Plaintiff Atelier Eumori to seal document sealed document[2]

译文:原告Atelier Eumori要求密封文件的动议密封文件[2]

11/26/2024

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atelier Eumori by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr

译文:小大卫·李·古尔布兰森(David Lee Gulbransen,Jr)为原告Atelier Eumori出庭

11/26/2024

CIVIL Cover Sheet

译文:公民封面

11/26/2024

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Atelier Eumori Schedule A to Complaint

译文:原告Atelier Eumori的密封文件投诉附表A

11/26/2024

COMPLAINT filed by Atelier Eumori; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22773285.

译文:投诉由Atelier Eumori提交;提交费405美元,收据编号AILNDC-22773285。

附件:
1:Exhibit Exhibit 1

案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系  18523047090 微信同号 

被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。

诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载

案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮


下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18523047090