2024-cv-02811 AI分析
08/29/2024
FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 43 in the amount of $100,000 as to certain defendants
08/20/2024
FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/20/2024. Mailed notice.
08/20/2024
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion 39 seeking a default judgment is granted. Plaintiff's motion 30 seeking the entry of a preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/20/2024. Mailed notice.
08/19/2024
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[40]
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
08/19/2024
MEMORANDUM by Wood Expressions, Inc. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment[39]
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
08/19/2024
MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for default judgment as to all Defendants
附件：
1:Exhibit A
08/15/2024
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wood Expressions, Inc. as to certain defendants
08/08/2024
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wood Expressions, Inc. as to certain defendant
08/01/2024
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wood Expressions, Inc. as to certain defendants
07/18/2024
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wood Expressions, Inc. as to certain defendants
07/12/2024
CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. regarding text entry, [33]
附件：
1:Exhibit A
07/12/2024
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion [30] for entry of a preliminary injunction as to certain Defendants. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 7/18/2024." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the temporary restraining order ("TRO"), as well as in Plaintiff's earlier motion [25] to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice.
07/11/2024
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wood Expressions, Inc. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 7/11/2024, answer due 8/1/2024.
附件：
1:Declaration of Jennifer V. Nacht
2:Exhibit A
07/11/2024
MEMORANDUM by Wood Expressions, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[30]
附件：
1:Declaration of Rachel S. Miller
2:Exhibit 1
07/11/2024
MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for preliminary injunction
附件：
1:Exhibit A
07/11/2024
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wood Expressions, Inc. as to certain defendant
06/27/2024
EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/27/2024. Mailed notice.
06/27/2024
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's Motion to extend TRO 24 is granted. Enter separate order. Mailed notice.
06/27/2024
DECLARATION of Rachel S. Miller regarding memorandum in support of motion 25
06/27/2024
MEMORANDUM by Wood Expressions, Inc. in support of extension of time 24
06/27/2024
MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order
06/27/2024
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
06/24/2024
SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Wood Expressions, Inc. (Document not scanned).
06/18/2024
SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/18/2024.
06/18/2024
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 3, motion for electronic service of process 16, and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order 11, are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (e.g., Dkts. 1118) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 2 and 15. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining the equitable accounting that, at this point, Plaintiff states that he may pursue. These facts justify, among other relief, the imposition of a prejudgment asset restraint against Defendants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per separate account. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing versions of Plaintiff's copyrighted works to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by infringing goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of joining all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice.
05/14/2024
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
05/14/2024
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
04/15/2024
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 17
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
2:(Exhibit 2)
04/15/2024
MEMORANDUM by Wood Expressions, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 16
04/15/2024
MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
04/15/2024
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-3 regarding declaration 14
附件：
1:Exhibit 2-1
2:Exhibit 2-2
3:(Exhibit 2-3)
04/15/2024
DECLARATION of Ron R. Reyes regarding memorandum in support of motion 12
附件：
1:(Exhibit 1)
04/15/2024
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 12
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:(Exhibit 4)
04/15/2024
MEMORANDUM by Wood Expressions, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 11
04/15/2024
MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
04/09/2024
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
04/09/2024
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
04/08/2024
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. by Jennifer Van Nacht
04/08/2024
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. by Rachel S Miller
04/08/2024
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler
04/08/2024
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio
04/08/2024
Notice of Claims involving Trademarks by Wood Expressions, Inc.
04/08/2024
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Wood Expressions, Inc.
04/08/2024
CIVIL Cover Sheet
04/08/2024
MOTION by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. for leave to file under Seal
04/08/2024
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Wood Expressions, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
04/08/2024
COMPLAINT filed by Wood Expressions, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21832595.
附件：
1:Exhibit 1
2:Exhibit 2
3:Exhibit 3
4:Exhibit 4
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
