最近更新：2024-12-25
2024-cv-05419 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 10/31/2024 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 40 in the amount of the Judgement Amounts as to certain defendants
译文：关于第40号命令的判决的完全满意某些被告的判决金额
|
| 08/19/2024 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/19/2024.Mailed notice
译文：约翰·F·尊敬的签署的最终判决令Kness于2024年8月19日发布。邮寄通知
|
| 08/19/2024 | ORDER: All remaining Defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Moreover, no remaining Defendant against whom default judgment is sought has appeared personally or by a representative. Written notice of Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, therefore, is not required, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2), and the motion (Dkt. 36) seeking a default judgment is granted. Because Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 934 (N.D. Ill. 2016). Plaintiff has presented screenshot evidence that each Defendant Internet Store is reaching out to do business with Illinois residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive Internet Stores through which Illinois residents can and do purchase infringing products. See, e.g., Dkt. 16, 17. In addition, based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction is warranted. The infringement of Plaintiff's patent irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public.Based on the foregoing, the Court awards Plaintiff the damages amounts set forth in the separate final judgment order based upon an accounting of the profits made by each Defaulting Defendant, which amounts are, again, not contested by any Defaulting Defendant.Enter separate Final Judgment Order. Plaintiff's pending motion (Dkt. 25) seeking a preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot. Civil case terminated.SO ORDERED in No. 24-cv-05419. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/19/2024.Mailed notice
译文：命令：所有剩余的被告要么没有认罪，要么没有以其他方式出现在对这一诉讼的辩护中。因此，违约是根据联邦民事诉讼规则第55(A)条输入的。此外，寻求作出缺席判决的其余被告均未亲自或由代表出庭。因此，原告就缺席判决提出的动议不需要书面通知，见FED。R.Civ.P.55(B)(2)和议案(Dkt.36)寻求缺席判决被批准。由于被告的商业活动直接针对包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国消费者，因此本法院对被告拥有个人管辖权。上午好。新娘和舞会印度河。《Asn诉P‘Ships及非法人团体》，载于附表A，《联邦判例汇编》第192页。3D 924,934(北伊利诺伊州2016)。原告提供了截图证据，证明每个被告互联网商店都在通过经营一个或多个商业互动互联网商店与伊利诺伊州居民做生意，伊利诺伊州居民可以并确实通过这些商店购买侵权产品。例如，参见Dkt。16、17.此外，根据原告先前提交的证据和承认因过失而承担的责任，原告已确定有必要发布永久禁制令。侵犯原告的专利对原告造成了不可挽回的损害，并使公众感到困惑。基于上述情况，法院根据对每一违约被告的利润的核算，判给原告在单独的最终判决命令中规定的损害赔偿金额，任何违约辩护人也不会对此提出异议。输入单独的最终判决命令。原告待决动议(Dkt.25)寻求初步禁令被认为是徒劳的。民事案件终止。因此下令在第24-cv-05419号。约翰·F·凯内斯阁下于2024年8月19日签署
|
| 08/15/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[37]
译文：贾斯汀·R的谴责高迪关于支持动议的备忘录[37]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 08/15/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment[36]
译文：备忘录作者：Oakley，Inc.支持违约动议、违约判决动议[36]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 08/15/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for default judgment as to all Defendants
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的动议对于违约，原告Oakley，Inc.提出动议对所有被告的缺席判决
附件： 1:Exhibit A |
| 08/08/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Oakley, Inc. as to certain defendants
译文：Oakley，Inc.自愿解雇通知至于某些被告
|
| 07/23/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oakley, Inc. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 7/23/2024, answer due 8/13/2024.
译文：由Oakley，Inc.执行的传票返回关于2024年7月23日附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，答复截止日期为2024年8月13日。
附件： 1:Declaration of Thomas J. Juettner 2:(Exhibit A) |
| 07/23/2024 | DECLARATION of Berel Y. Lakovitsky regarding memorandum in support of motion 32
译文：Berel Y的声明拉科维茨基关于支持第32号动议的备忘录
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 07/23/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 31
译文：备忘录作者：Oakley，Inc.支持初步禁令动议31
|
| 07/23/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for preliminary injunction as to Certain Defendants
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的动议针对某些被告的初步禁令
附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 07/16/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. regarding text entry, 29
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.提供的服务证书关于文本输入，29
附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 07/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 25 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 07/22/2024." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the order entering the temporary restraining order ("TRO"), the TRO is extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Should this extension exceed the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), it will become "in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order [will] remain[] effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice.
译文：约翰·F·凯内斯法官面前的会议记录：法院面前是原告提出的关于生效初步禁令的第25号动议。关于这项已登录并继续进行的动议，原告必须立即向所有被告送达以下陈述：“法院已在知情的情况下受理了初步禁制令的动议，如果被告在2024年7月22日或之前出庭并提出反对，法院将考虑无人反对的动议。”原告必须在送达后两个工作日内提交法院陈述的送达证明。基于进入临时限制令的命令所述的理由，临时限制令的有效期延至法院裁决初步强制令动议的日期，并包括在内。参见《密歇根州H-D公司诉希腊免税店S.A.》[《联邦判例汇编》第3集第694卷第827、843-45页(第七巡回法庭)]一案。2012年)。如果这一延期超过了FRCP 65(B)规定的临时禁令的最长期限，它将成为“实际上是一项可上诉的初步禁令，但该命令[将]仍然有效”。身份证。在844。邮寄的通知。
|
| 07/12/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oakley, Inc. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 7/12/2024, answer due 8/2/2024.
译文：由Oakley，Inc.执行的传票返回关于2024年12月7日附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，答复截止日期为2024年8月2日。
附件： 1:Declaration of Thomas J. Juettner 2:Exhibit A |
| 07/12/2024 | DECLARATION of Berel Y. Lakovitsky regarding memorandum in support of motion[26]
译文：Berel Y的声明拉科维茨基关于支持动议的备忘录[26]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 07/12/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[25]
译文：备忘录作者：Oakley，Inc.支持初步禁令动议[25]
|
| 07/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for preliminary injunction as to Certain Defendants
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的动议针对某些被告的初步禁令
附件： 1:Exhibit A |
| 07/10/2024 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Oakley, Inc. (Document not scanned)
译文：Oakley，Inc.发布金额为10，000.00美元的保证金（文件未扫描）
|
| 07/08/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：针对被告发出传票附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 07/05/2024 | Registry Deposit Information Form by Oakley, Inc.
译文：Oakley，Inc.的注册处存款信息表
|
| 07/03/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 7/3/2024. Mailed notice.
译文：约翰·F·阁下签署的密封临时限制令Kness于2024年7月3日。邮寄通知。
|
| 07/03/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4], ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order [13], and motion for electronic service of process [18] are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (e.g., Dkt. 16 917) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries [2], [3], and [17]. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining the equitable accounting that, at this point, Plaintiff states that it may pursue. These facts justify, among other relief, the imposition of a prejudgment asset restraint against Defendants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per separate account. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing versions of Plaintiff's patented works to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by infringing goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of joining all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的约翰·F·凯内斯面前的会议记录：原告要求允许盖章存档的动议[4]、单方面要求临时限制令的动议[13]和电子送达法律程序文件的动议[18]部分获得批准。原告提交的材料(例如，Dkt.16 917)确定，如果被告在执行原告请求的初步禁令救济之前得知这些程序，被告很有可能销毁相关的书面证据，并将资产隐藏或转移到法院无法触及的地方。因此，根据在适当时间开封的条件，原告现在可以将动议中确定的盖章并出现在案卷[2]、[3]和[17]上的文件加盖印章。与本会议记录一起登录的临时限制令也应加盖印章。此外，就上述动议而言，原告的申请暂时支持根据《财务报告》第65(B)(1)条单方面提起诉讼。具体地说，如上所述，如果被告在TRO可以发布之前被告知这一程序，很可能会改变资产和网站的方向，从而破坏原告在确定被告、阻止被告的侵权行为和获得原告在这一点上可能寻求的衡平会计方面的利益。这些事实证明，除其他救济外，对被告施加预判资产限制，每个单独账户的金额不超过50,000美元。此外，最高法院认定，至少就目前而言，在这份有限而片面的记录中，在不影响重新讨论这一问题的情况下，法院对被告拥有个人管辖权，因为他们直接针对包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国消费者的商业活动。具体地说，被告通过建立和经营电子商务商店，以使用一个或多个卖家化名的美国消费者为目标，向包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国提供送货服务，接受美元付款，并使用原告专利作品的侵权版本向伊利诺伊州居民销售产品，从而瞄准了伊利诺伊州居民的销售目标。提交给法院的证据还表明，原告根据案情(包括主动侵权和向伊利诺伊州销售的证据)证明了胜诉的可能性，对原告的损害是不可弥补的，并且禁令符合公共利益。由于侵权商品造成消费者困惑，禁令服务于公共利益，而指示被告停止侵权的命令并不会对他们造成相反的伤害。诉讼程序的电子送达不违反任何条约，并符合正当程序，因为它有效地将这一诉讼的悬而未决传达给被告。正如几名法官以前指出的那样，可能有理由质疑将所有被告加入这一诉讼是否适当，以及原告是否会进行会计核算(原告声称这是冻结资产的理由)，但在这个初步阶段，法院相信，原告已经提供了充分的证据表明协调活动和会计核算的可能性，以证明对所有被告提出的救济请求是合理的。有必要加快发现，以确定被告和实施资产冻结。如果任何被告出庭并提出反对，法院将重新考虑资产冻结和合并。进入密封的临时限制令。邮寄的通知。
|
| 07/01/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[19]
译文：贾斯汀·R的谴责高迪关于支持动议的备忘录[19]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 |
| 07/01/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[18]
译文：备忘录作者：Oakley，Inc.支持杂项救济动议[18]
|
| 07/01/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的动议根据美联储提供电子流程服务。R. Civ.第4页（f）（3）
|
| 07/01/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-2 regarding declaration[16]
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的密封展品附件2 -关于声明的第1-2部分[16]
|
| 07/01/2024 | DECLARATION of Jason Groppe regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]
译文：杰森·格罗佩（Jason Groppe）就支持动议的备忘录发表声明[14]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 07/01/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]
译文：贾斯汀·R的谴责高迪关于支持动议的备忘录[14]
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 |
| 07/01/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[13]
译文：备忘录作者：Oakley，Inc.支持临时限制令动议[13]
|
| 07/01/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for temporary restraining order Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的动议临时限制令，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制和快速发现
|
| 06/28/2024 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
译文：向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交MASYS专利报告。
|
| 06/28/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 06/28/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·F。克内斯。尊敬的杰弗里·科尔被指定为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别1）。
|
| 06/27/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. by Thomas Joseph Juettner
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.律师出庭托马斯·约瑟夫·朱特纳
|
| 06/27/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. by Berel Yonathan Lakovitsky
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.律师出庭作者：Berel Yonathan Lakovitsky
|
| 06/27/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.律师出庭艾米·克劳特·齐格勒
|
| 06/27/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.律师出庭作者：贾斯汀·R高迪奥
|
| 06/27/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Patents by Oakley, Inc.
译文：Oakley，Inc.涉及专利的索赔通知
|
| 06/27/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Oakley, Inc.
译文：Oakley，Inc.根据当地规则3.2通知关联公司
|
| 06/27/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 06/27/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. for leave to file under seal
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的动议申请盖章归档许可
|
| 06/27/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. Exhibit 1 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的密封展品附件1 -关于投诉的第1-2部分[1]
|
| 06/27/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告Oakley，Inc.的密封展品有关投诉的附表A [1]
|
| 06/27/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Oakley, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22190025.
译文：Oakley，Inc.提出的投诉;备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22190025。
附件： 1:Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 4 4:Exhibit 5 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
