最近更新：2025-02-25
2024-cv-08258 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/11/2025 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：针对被告发出传票（法庭参与者）附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 02/11/2025 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
译文：提交（法庭参与者）被告的传票原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.在附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会
|
| 02/11/2025 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/11/2025:
译文：由尊敬的玛莎·M签署的命令2025年11月2日帕卡德：
|
| 02/11/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery, 29, is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Order.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕考尔德：原告29岁的加快开示动议部分获得批准，部分被拒绝。输入顺序。
|
| 02/06/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to unseal certain documents, 30, is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the Schedule A to the Complaint 2 and Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Jenny Vo 17.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德：原告要求解封某些文件的动议，30，已被批准。法院书记员被指示解封申诉书2的附表A和Jenny Vo 17声明的附件4。
|
| 02/06/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. to unseal document exhibit 17, exhibit 2
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议解封文件证据17、证据2
|
| 02/06/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. for discovery Expedited
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议加速发现
|
| 01/31/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to comply with order, 26, is granted. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 2/7/2025.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。帕科德：原告提出的延长遵守第26号命令的时间的动议已获批准。如果原告希望继续审理此案，原告必须在2025年7月2日之前在案卷中公开提交其证据。
|
| 01/31/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 25, is denied. "While motions to reconsider are permitted. they are disfavored." Patrick v. City of Chicago, 103 F. Supp. 3d 907, 911 (N.D. Ill. 2015). "This is a heavy burden for the moving party and makes a motion for reconsideration an inappropriate medium to 'rehash' past arguments[.]" Alice F. v. Health Care Serv. Corp., No. 17-cv-3710, 2019 WL 11626480, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 17, 2019) (citation omitted). "Motions for reconsideration serve a limited function: to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v. CBI Indus., Inc., 90 F.3d 1264, 1269 (7th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted). Plaintiff has not submitted any newly discovered evidence. Thus, plaintiff can prevail only if it demonstrates that the court made a manifest error of law or fact. "A manifest error of law or fact under this standard occurs when a district court 'has patently misunderstood a party, or has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the Court by the parties, or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension.'" Patrick, 103 F. Supp. 3d at 912 (quoting Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir. 1990)). Plaintiff has not shown that the court made a manifest error of law or fact. Plaintiff points out that the court has the power to issue an asset restraint when a plaintiff seeks an accounting and profits in the alternative to statutory damages in its complaint. See CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002) (asset freeze was "appropriate" when plaintiff sought statutory damages or equitable relief in the alternative). But simply because a court has the authority to issue an asset freeze in such circumstances does not mean that the plaintiff here is entitled to one. As explained in the prior minute entry, 23, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff intends to actually seek or obtain equitable reliefas opposed to statutory damagesin this case. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 25, is denied.
译文：在Martha M.Pacold阁下面前的会议记录：原告要求复议的动议，25，被驳回。“虽然重新考虑的动议是允许的，但它们是不受欢迎的。”《帕特里克诉芝加哥》，《联邦判例汇编》，第103页。3D 907,911(北伊利诺伊州2015年)。“这对提出动议的一方来说是一个沉重的负担，并使重新审议动议成为一种不适当的媒介，以‘重提’过去的论点[]。”Alice F.诉Health Care Serv.公司，编号17-cv-3710,2019年WL 11626480，at*1(N.D.IL.2019年6月17日)(省略引文)。“复议动议的作用是有限的：纠正明显的法律或事实错误或提出新发现的证据。”《农业信贷协会诉CBI Indus，Inc.》[《联邦判例汇编》第三辑，第90卷，第1264,1269页(第七巡回法庭)]。1996)(省略引文)。原告没有提交任何新发现的证据。因此，只有当原告证明法院犯了明显的法律或事实错误时，原告才能获胜。“根据这一标准，法律或事实的明显错误发生在以下情况：地方法院‘明显误解了一方当事人的意思，或在当事人向法院提出的对抗性问题之外作出了决定，或者犯了一个错误，不是推理上的错误，而是担忧上的错误。’”帕特里克，103 F附加费。3D at 912(引用Waunakee Bank诉Rochester Cheese Sales，Inc.，《联邦判例汇编》第二辑，第906卷，第1185,1191页(第七巡回法庭1990年))。原告没有证明法院犯了明显的法律或事实错误。原告指出，当原告在其诉状中寻求会计和利润替代法定损害赔偿时，法院有权发布资产限制。参见《CSC控股公司诉雷迪西》[《联邦判例汇编》第三辑，第309卷，第988,996页(第七巡回法庭)]一案。2002年)(当原告在替代方案中寻求法定损害赔偿或衡平法救济时，资产冻结是“适当的”)。但仅仅因为法院有权在这种情况下发布资产冻结令，并不意味着这里的原告有权这样做。正如前一分钟条目23所解释的那样，法院不相信原告实际上打算寻求或获得公平救济，而不是在本案中寻求法定损害。原告25岁的复议动议被驳回。
|
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. for extension of time to Comply with Order 23
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议延长遵守第23号命令的时间
|
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. for reconsideration regarding order on motion for leave to file, order on motion for temporary restraining order, text entry, 23
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议重新考虑关于许可提交动议的命令、关于临时限制令动议的命令、文本输入、23
|
| 01/17/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 18, is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, service is not necessary because this court has already denied the motion for a TRO. 23.
译文：在尊敬的玛莎·M之前报名参赛。Pacold：原告要求电子送达诉讼程序的动议，18，已被批准。法院认为，根据美联储，电子程序送达是适当的。R. Civ.第4页（f）（3）。电子诉讼送达不违反任何条约，并且符合正当程序，因为它有效地向被告传达了该诉讼的未决性。就本案中的动议要求送达任何临时限制令的程序而言，无需送达，因为本法院已经驳回了TRO动议。23.
|
| 01/17/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 3, and for a temporary restraining order and for expedited discovery, 13 are denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See 3. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ ] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." Id. (second alteration in original) (quoting Banister v. Firestone, No. 17-cv-8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018)). In Schedule A cases, plaintiffs often initially demand equitable relief in the form of an accounting of profits, but after obtaining a temporary asset freeze, plaintiffs uniformly shift their focus to demanding statutory damages. Id. at *3-4. In substance, then, if not in form, Schedule A plaintiffs seek prejudgment asset restraints to establish a fund from which money damages may be awarded. So, despite the demand in plaintiff's complaint that it be awarded defendants' profits, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff will actually seek or obtain such equitable relief-as opposed to statutory damages-in this case. See Zorro, 2023 WL 8807254, at *3-4. Thus, even if plaintiff's initial demand for an accounting of profits could provide this court with the power to issue a prejudgment asset freeze, see Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 333; Banister, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9, the court is not persuaded that such a freeze is warranted. Because the court denies the motion for a temporary restraining order, there is no reason to seal plaintiff's filings pending such relief. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 3, and for a temporary restraining order, 13, are therefore denied. Plaintiff's sealed exhibits, 2, 17, are stricken. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 1/31/2025.
译文：在Martha M.Pacold阁下面前的会议记录：原告要求允许密封存档的动议，3，以及要求临时限制令和快速透露的动议，13被驳回。原告寻求加盖印章的许可，以便原告可以在披露被告身份之前获得冻结被告资产的临时限制令。请参见3。“最高法院已明确表示，法院无权在案件开始时发布资产冻结令，除非当事人寻求公平的金钱救济。”Zorro Productions，Inc.诉个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人团体，载于本文件附表A，编号23-cv-5761,2023年WL 8807254，at*4(N.D.Il.，2023年12月20日)(引用Grupo墨西哥公司诉Desarroll lo S.A.诉All。债券基金公司，载于《美国最高法院判例汇编》，第527卷，第308页(1999)；另见深圳市益宏照明有限公司诉附表A所列合伙企业和非法人团体案，编号23-cv-1560，见Dkt。15(N.D.伊利诺伊州2023年11月22日)。事实上，“S是一个普遍的问题[]预先判断资产限制并不是简单地建立一个基金，以满足后来的金钱损害赔偿。”身份证。(原文第二次修改)(引用班尼斯特诉费尔斯通案，编号17-cv-8940,2018年WL 4224444，at*9(N.D.9月5,2018))。在附表A的案件中，原告最初通常以利润会计的形式要求衡平法救济，但在获得临时资产冻结后，原告统一将重点转移到要求法定损害赔偿上。身份证。在*3-4。因此，在实质上，如果不是形式上的话，附表A原告寻求判决前的资产限制，以建立一个基金，从中可以判给金钱损害赔偿。因此，尽管原告在诉状中要求获得被告的利润，但法院并不相信原告在本案中实际上会寻求或获得这种衡平法救济--而不是法定损害赔偿。见佐罗，2023年WL 8807254，第*3-4页。因此，即使原告最初要求对利润进行会计核算可以使本法院有权发布判决前资产冻结，参见Grupo墨西哥集团，美国第527号，第333号；班尼斯特，2018年WL 4224444，第9号，法院不相信这种冻结是有根据的。由于法院驳回了临时限制令的动议，因此在等待救济之前，没有理由封存原告的文件。因此，原告要求允许加盖印章3和临时限制令13的动议被驳回。原告密封的证物，2，17，被破坏了。如果原告希望继续审理此案，原告必须在2025年1月31日之前将其证据公开归档。
|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 11/13/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. by Jennifer Van Nacht
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的律师出庭詹妮弗·范·纳特
|
| 09/12/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 19
译文：贾斯汀·R的谴责高迪奥关于支持第19号动议的备忘录
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
| 09/12/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 18
译文：备忘录作者：Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.支持杂项救济动议18
|
| 09/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议根据美联储提供电子流程服务。R. Civ.第4页（f）（3）
|
| 09/12/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. Exhibit 4 Parts 1-2 regarding declaration 16
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的密封展览附件4关于声明16的第1-2部分
附件： 1:Exhibit 4-1 2:(Exhibit 4-2) |
| 09/12/2024 | DECLARATION of Jenny Vo regarding memorandum in support of motion 14
译文：Jenny Vo就支持第14号动议的备忘录发表声明
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:(Exhibit 3) |
| 09/12/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 14
译文：贾斯汀·R的谴责高迪奥关于支持第14号动议的备忘录
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
| 09/12/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 13
译文：备忘录作者：Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.支持临时限制令动议13
|
| 09/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议临时限制令，包括临时禁令、域名临时转让、临时资产限制和快速发现
|
| 09/11/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
译文：向原告律师Lanham调解计划材料发送。
|
| 09/11/2024 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
译文：MASYS向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交的商标报告
附件： 1:(List of Tradmarks, Ex. 1) |
| 09/10/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 09/10/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的玛莎·M。帕尔德。被指定为治安法官尊敬的杨·B。Kim.案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 09/10/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. by Thomas Joseph Juettner
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的律师出庭托马斯·约瑟夫·朱特纳
|
| 09/10/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. by Kahlia Roe Halpern
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的律师出庭作者：Kahlia Roe Halpern
|
| 09/10/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的律师出庭艾米·克劳特·齐格勒
|
| 09/10/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的律师出庭作者：贾斯汀·R高迪奥
|
| 09/10/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
译文：Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.涉及商标的索赔通知
|
| 09/10/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
译文：Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 09/10/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 09/10/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. for leave to file under seal
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提出的动议申请盖章归档许可
|
| 09/10/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.的密封展览有关投诉的附表A [1]
|
| 09/10/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22459783.
译文：由Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.提交的投诉;备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22459783。
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:Exhibit 4 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
