最近更新：2025-02-16
2024-cv-11860 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/11/2025 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：就附表A所列的合伙企业和非法人团体向被告发布的摘要（法院参与者）
|
| 02/11/2025 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC为被告在附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人团体提交的摘要（法庭参与者）
|
| 02/07/2025 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/7/2025:
译文：Martha M.Pacold阁下于2025年2月7日签署的命令：
|
| 02/07/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery, [28], is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Order.
译文：在尊敬的Martha M.Pacold面前简短发言：原告关于加快证据开示的动议[28]部分获得批准，部分被驳回。输入订单。
|
| 02/06/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to unseal certain documents, [29], is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal Schedule A to the Complaint [2] and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Emily Holt [17].
译文：在尊敬的Martha M.Pacold面前稍作记录：原告要求启封某些文件的动议[29]获得批准。法院书记官被指示启封起诉书[2]的附表A和艾米丽·霍尔特声明[17]的附件2。
|
| 02/05/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC to unseal document exhibit[17], exhibit[2]
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC要求启封文件附件[17]、附件[2]的动议
|
| 02/05/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC for discovery Expedited
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC关于加快证据开示的动议
|
| 01/31/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to comply with order, 25, is granted. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 2/7/2025.
译文：在尊敬的Martha M.Pacold面前简短发言：原告要求延长遵守第25号命令的时间的动议获得批准。如果原告希望继续审理此案，原告必须在2025年2月7日前将其证物公开提交到案件目录上。
|
| 01/31/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 24, is denied. "While motions to reconsider are permitted. they are disfavored." Patrick v. City of Chicago, 103 F. Supp. 3d 907, 911 (N.D. Ill. 2015). "This is a heavy burden for the moving party and makes a motion for reconsideration an inappropriate medium to 'rehash' past arguments[.]" Alice F. v. Health Care Serv. Corp., No. 17-cv-3710, 2019 WL 11626480, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 17, 2019) (citation omitted). "Motions for reconsideration serve a limited function: to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v. CBI Indus., Inc., 90 F.3d 1264, 1269 (7th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted). Plaintiff has not submitted any newly discovered evidence. Thus, plaintiff can prevail only if it demonstrates that the court made a manifest error of law or fact. "A manifest error of law or fact under this standard occurs when a district court 'has patently misunderstood a party, or has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented to the Court by the parties, or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension.'" Patrick, 103 F. Supp. 3d at 912 (quoting Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir. 1990)). Plaintiff has not shown that the court made a manifest error of law or fact. Plaintiff points out that the court has the power to issue an asset restraint when a plaintiff seeks an accounting and profits in the alternative to statutory damages in its complaint. See CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002) (asset freeze was "appropriate" when plaintiff sought statutory damages or equitable relief in the alternative). But simply because a court has the authority to issue an asset freeze in such circumstances does not mean that the plaintiff here is entitled to one. As explained in the prior minute entry, 22, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff intends to actually seek or obtain equitable relief-as opposed to statutory damages-in this case. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 24, is denied.
译文：在尊敬的Martha M.Pacold面前简短发言：原告于24日提出的复议动议被驳回。“虽然重新考虑的动议是允许的，但它们是不受欢迎的。”帕特里克诉芝加哥市案，《联邦地区法院判例补编》第103卷第907、911页（伊利诺伊州北部，2015年）。“这对动议方来说是一个沉重的负担，并使重新审议的动议成为‘重述’过去论点的不恰当媒介[。]”Alice F.诉Health Care Serv案。公司，编号17-cv-3710，2019 WL 11626480，第1页（伊利诺伊州北达科他州，2019年6月17日）（引文省略）。“复议动议的作用有限：纠正明显的法律或事实错误，或提供新发现的证据。”Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole诉CBI Indus。，股份有限公司，90 F.3d 1264，1269（第7巡回法庭，1996年）（引用省略）。原告没有提交任何新发现的证据。因此，原告只有在证明法院在法律或事实上存在明显错误的情况下才能获胜。“当地区法院‘明显误解了一方当事人，或在当事人向法院提出的对抗性问题之外做出了决定，或不是推理错误，而是理解错误’时，就会发生本标准下的明显法律或事实错误。”帕特里克，《联邦法院判例汇编》第103卷第3卷第912页（引用Waunakee银行诉Rochester Cheese Sales，股份有限公司，《联邦上诉法院判例汇编第2辑》第906卷第1185、1191页（第7巡回法院，1990年））。原告没有证明法院存在明显的法律或事实错误。原告指出，当原告在其诉状中寻求会计和利润作为法定损害赔偿的替代方案时，法院有权发布资产限制。参见CSC Holdings，股份有限公司诉Redisi，《联邦上诉法院判例汇编》第3编第309卷第988、996页（第7巡回法院，2002年）（当原告寻求法定损害赔偿或衡平法救济时，资产冻结是“适当的”）。但仅仅因为法院有权在这种情况下发布资产冻结，并不意味着这里的原告有权获得资产冻结。正如前一记录第22条所解释的那样，法院并不认为原告打算在本案中实际寻求或获得衡平救济，而不是法定损害赔偿。原告于24日提出的复议动议被驳回。
|
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC for extension of time to Comply with Order 22
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC要求延长遵守第22号命令的时间的动议
|
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC for reconsideration regarding order on motion for leave to file, order on motion for temporary restraining order, text entry, 22
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC关于重新考虑许可申请令、临时限制令申请令、文本输入的动议，22
|
| 01/17/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 18, is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, service is not necessary because this court has already denied the motion for a TRO. 22.
译文：在尊敬的Martha M.Pacold面前简短发言：原告18岁的电子送达传票动议获得批准。法院认为，根据《联邦民事诉讼法》，电子送达法律程序是适当的。第4（f）（3）页。电子送达程序不违反任何条约，也符合正当程序，因为它有效地向被告传达了这一诉讼的未决情况。在本案中，如果动议要求送达任何临时限制令的法律程序文件，则不需要送达，因为本法院已经驳回了TRO的动议。22.
|
| 01/17/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 3, and for a temporary restraining order, temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery, 13, are denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See 3. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ ] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." Id. (second alteration in original) (quoting Banister v. Firestone, No. 17-cv-8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018)). In Schedule A cases, plaintiffs often initially demand equitable relief in the form of an accounting of profits, but after obtaining a temporary asset freeze, plaintiffs uniformly shift their focus to demanding statutory damages. Id. at *3-4. In substance, then, if not in form, Schedule A plaintiffs seek prejudgment asset restraints to establish a fund from which money damages may be awarded. So, despite the demand in plaintiff's complaint that it be awarded defendants' profits, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff will actually seek or obtain such equitable relief-as opposed to statutory damages-in this case. See Zorro, 2023 WL 8807254, at *3-4. Thus, even if plaintiff's initial demand for an accounting of profits could provide this court with the power to issue a prejudgment asset freeze, see Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 333; Banister, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9, the court is not persuaded that such a freeze is warranted. Because the court denies the motion for a temporary restraining order, there is no reason to seal plaintiff's filings pending such relief. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 3, and for a temporary restraining order, 13, are therefore denied. Plaintiff's sealed exhibits, 2, 17, are stricken. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 1/31/2025.
译文：在Martha M.Pacold阁下面前简短发言：原告关于允许密封归档的动议3，以及关于临时限制令、临时资产限制和快速发现的动议13，均被驳回。原告要求允许密封备案，以便在披露被告身份之前，原告可以获得冻结被告资产的临时限制令。见3。“最高法院已明确表示，法院无权在案件开始时发布资产冻结令，除非该方寻求公平的货币救济。”Zorro Productions，股份有限公司诉个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非公司协会，见附件a，编号23-cv-5761，2023 WL 8807254，见*4（N.D.Ill.，2023年12月20日）（引用Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo美国诉All.Bond Fund，股份有限公司，527 U.S.308（1999））；另见有限公司诉附件A（编号：23-cv-1560）中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会，见Dkt。15（伊利诺伊州北部，2023年11月22日）。事实上，“作为一个一般性问题，仅仅为了建立一个基金来满足后来的金钱赔偿要求，预先判断资产限制是不合适的。”同上（原第二次修改）（引用Banister诉Firestone，第17-cv-89402018 WL 4224444号，第*9页（伊利诺伊州北部，2018年9月5日）。在附表A案件中，原告最初通常要求以利润会计的形式获得衡平救济，但在获得临时资产冻结后，原告一致将重点转移到要求法定损害赔偿上。同上，第3-4页。那么，从实质上讲，如果不是形式上的，附表A原告寻求判决前的资产限制，以建立一个可以判给金钱赔偿的基金。因此，尽管原告在诉状中要求获得被告的利润，但法院并不相信原告会在本案中寻求或获得与法定损害赔偿相反的衡平救济。见佐罗，2023 WL 8807254，第3-4页。因此，即使原告最初要求对利润进行会计处理，也可以使本法院有权发布判决前资产冻结，见Grupo Mexicano，527 U.s.at 333；Banister，2018 WL 4224444，第9页，法院不认为有必要冻结。由于法院驳回了临时限制令的动议，因此没有理由在等待此类救济期间封存原告的文件。因此，原告关于允许密封归档的动议3和关于临时限制令的动议13被驳回。原告的密封证物2、17被销毁。如果原告希望继续审理此案，原告必须在2025年1月31日前将其证物公开提交到案件目录上。
|
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2（关联方通知），除个人或独资企业外，任何非政府方都必须提交一份声明，说明在经过认真审查后该方所知的所有关联方，或者，如果该方没有发现关联方，则必须提交一份反映这一事实的声明。关联公司的定义如下：直接或间接（通过拥有一个或多个其他实体）拥有一方5%或以上股份的任何实体或个人。该声明将以PDF格式电子归档，并按照提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，各方必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十（30）天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出此会议记录命令，提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关其他附属机构的最新信息。如果律师对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月20日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 11/21/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 19
译文：Justin R.Gaudio关于支持动议19的备忘录的声明
附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
| 11/21/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Merch Traffic, LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 18
译文：Merch Traffic，LLC支持杂项救济动议的备忘录18
|
| 11/21/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC根据《联邦民事诉讼法》提出的电子送达传票动议。第4（f）（3）页
|
| 11/21/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC Exhibit 2 regarding declaration 16
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC关于声明16的密封附件2
附件： 1:(Exhibit 2-1) |
| 11/21/2024 | DECLARATION of Emily Holt regarding memorandum in support of motion 14
译文：Emily Holt关于支持动议14的备忘录的声明
附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 11/21/2024 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 14
译文：Justin R.Gaudio关于支持动议14的备忘录的声明
附件： 1:(Exhibit 4) 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit 2 |
| 11/21/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Merch Traffic, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order 13
译文：Merch Traffic，LLC支持临时限制令动议的备忘录13
|
| 11/21/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC提出的临时限制令动议，包括临时禁令、临时资产限制和快速发现
|
| 11/19/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
译文：邮寄给原告律师Lanham调解计划材料。
|
| 11/19/2024 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
译文：MAILED向弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市专利商标局提交商标报告。
|
| 11/18/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：书记员通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），本法院的美国治安法官可以主持本次民事诉讼的所有程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼，包括审判、最终判决的输入和所有审判后的诉讼，各方必须在随附的同意书上签字。只有各方签署后，此同意书才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意地方法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 11/18/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件移交给尊敬的Martha M.Pacold。任命尊敬的戴维·韦斯曼先生为治安法官。案例分配：随机分配。（民用类别2）。
|
| 11/18/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC by Luana Faria De Souza (Faria De Souza, Luana)
译文：Luana Faria De Souza律师代表原告Merch Traffic，LLC出庭
|
| 11/18/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC by Kahlia Roe Halpern
译文：Kahlia Roe Halpern为原告Merch Traffic，LLC出庭
|
| 11/18/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler
译文：Amy Crout Ziegler代表原告Merch Traffic，LLC出庭
|
| 11/18/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC by Justin R. Gaudio
译文：Justin R.Gaudio代表原告Merch Traffic，LLC出庭
|
| 11/18/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Merch Traffic, LLC
译文：Merch Traffic，LLC关于商标索赔的通知
|
| 11/18/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Merch Traffic, LLC
译文：Merch Traffic，LLC根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 11/18/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：土建封面
|
| 11/18/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC for leave to file under Seal
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC要求盖章备案的动议
|
| 11/18/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Merch Traffic, LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
译文：原告Merch Traffic，LLC关于投诉的附表A的密封附件[1]
|
| 11/18/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Merch Traffic, LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22742428.
译文：Merch Traffic，LLC提交的投诉；申请费405美元，收据编号AILNDC-22742428。
附件： 1:Exhibit 4 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 2 4:Exhibit 1 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
