2025-cv-03321 AI分析
07/10/2025
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Order, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for misjoinder 16. Plaintiff has until 7/24/2025 to file an amended complaint naming one defendant or a group of properly joined defendants. If the latter, Plaintiff must also file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court grants Plaintiff's motions to seal 6 8 and denies Plaintiff's motions for temporary restraining orders 3 5 as moot. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 7/10/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译
07/07/2025
AMENDED complaint by Pranash (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., LTD against Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified On Schedule A, The 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit B
2:(Exhibit C)
3:Appendix Schedule A
4:Exhibit A
06/18/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On review of the complaint and the memorandum in support of Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court raises the propriety of joinder of the 214 Defendants. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) governs permissive joinder of defendants. It permits defendants to be joined in a single action if two conditions are met: (1) "any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions"; and (2) "any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action." Fed. R. Civ. P 20(a)(2); see UWM Student Ass'n v. Lovell, 888 F.3d 854, 863 (7th Cir. 2018). As other courts within this District have held, "it is appropriate for federal courts to raise improper joinder on their own, especially when the sheer number of defendants waves a joinder red flag and ups the chances that the plaintiff should be paying separate filing fees for separate cases. The need for sua sponte evaluation also intensifies when it would take enormous time and effort to check the evidencesuch as screenshots of dozens and dozens of defendants' online storesamassed into a single case absent actual connections between the defendants." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 186 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citing George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007)); see also, e.g., Andrew Blair Bailie v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A," 24-cv-02150 Dkt. 28 (Apr. 24, 2024).). Here, Plaintiff's allegations purporting to establish joinder are merely conclusory. For example, Plaintiff alleges that "Defendants concurrently employ and benefit from similar advertising and marketing strategies." R. 2, para. 19. Similar to another court in this District, this Court's "experience has shown that, while some individual defendants may operate several online stores, and while some individual defendants may coordinate with other defendants before or after the filing of the infringement action, rarely, if ever, have all defendants named in a Schedule A case worked together." Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 24-cv-09401 Dkt. 23 (Oct. 18, 2024). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(3) requires that, "factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery." Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiff to file, on or before 7/7/25, a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder, including, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)((3), showing cause why the allegation that "defendants are working in active concert" does not violate Rule 11(b)(3). Instead of the supplemental memorandum, by the same deadline, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with (a) one defendant or (b) a subset of the defendants along with a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Mailed notice. 翻译
04/14/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Attorney Qi Men's motion to withdraw 10 as attorney for Defendant Pranash (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., LTD. is granted. Mailed notice. 翻译
04/10/2025
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pranash (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., LTD by Alexander Warden 翻译
04/10/2025
MOTION by Attorney Qi Men to withdraw as attorney for Pranash (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., LTD. No party information provided 翻译
04/03/2025
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 6/17/2025, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice. 翻译
03/29/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff Pranash (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., LTD to seal document memorandum in support of motion 4, MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order 3, MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD to seal document memorandum in support of motion 4, MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order 3, am 6, amended complaint, 2, MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order Motion For Alternative Service 5 翻译
03/28/2025
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
03/28/2025
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). 翻译
03/27/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD to seal document memorandum in support of motion 4, MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order 3, amended complaint, 2, MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order Motion For Alternative Service 5 翻译
03/27/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order Motion For Alternative Service 翻译
03/27/2025
MEMORANDUM by PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD in support of motion for temporary restraining order 3 翻译
附件：
1:(Declaration)
03/27/2025
MOTION by Plaintiff PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD for temporary restraining order 翻译
03/27/2025
Verified Complaint AMENDED complaint by PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD against THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATES IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A 翻译
附件：
1:(Exhibit)
2:Appendix
3:Exhibit
4:Exhibit
5:Exhibit
6:Exhibit
7:Exhibit
03/27/2025
COMPLAINT filed by PRANASH (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23270647. 翻译
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
