最近更新：2025-01-02
2024-cv-07145 AI分析
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 12/31/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff is ordered to add all remaining defendant names listed in the Schedule A to the docket within three business days. Instructions can be found on the Court's website. The Clerk is directed to unseal this matter. Mailed notice. (jcc,)
译文：在尊敬的阿普丽尔·M之前报名参赛。佩里：原告被命令在三个工作日内将附表A中列出的所有剩余被告姓名添加到待审名单中。说明可在法院网站上找到。指示文员解封此事。邮寄通知。(jcc,)
|
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice.
译文：年度提醒：根据当地规则3.2(关联企业的通知)，任何非政府组织，除个人或独资企业外，必须提交一份声明，列出该方经过认真审查后已知的所有关联企业，或者，如果该方未确定任何关联企业，则必须提交一份反映该事实的声明。附属公司的定义如下：直接或间接(通过一个或多个其他实体的所有权)拥有一方5%或更多股份的任何实体或个人。声明将以PDF格式以电子形式提交，并根据提示在CM/ECF中输入附属公司。作为对律师的提醒，当事人必须在先前报告的信息发生任何变化后三十(30)天内补充其附属公司的声明。向所有记录在案的律师发出这一记录命令，以提醒律师有义务在必要时提供有关更多附属公司的最新信息。如果法律顾问对此过程有任何疑问，此链接将提供更多信息。弗吉尼亚·M·肯德尔阁下于2024年12月27日签署：邮寄通知。
|
| 12/30/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 41 "Liaowev8" and 62 "HZD US"
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC对被告41“Liaowev8”和62“HWD US”自愿解雇的通知
|
| 12/20/2024 | STIPULATION of Dismissal for Defendant 90 "Epic Edeals"
译文：解雇被告90名“史诗般的阴谋”
|
| 12/19/2024 | PRELIMINARY INJUCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable April M. Perry on 12/19/2024. Mailed notice. (jcc,)
译文：初步判决令。由尊敬的阿普丽尔·M签署佩里于2024年12月19日。邮寄通知。(jcc,)
|
| 12/19/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Hearing held on Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction 33 36 and the Motions are granted. As stated during the hearing, the Court has serious concerns with the arguments in support of joinder for some of the Defendants in this case. To the extent that Defendants are negotiating a resolution to the case as a group, joinder is appropriate. Similarly, if Defendants have been in contact with Plaintiff and have not objected to the joinder, the Court will not object sua sponte. For what may be as many as 70 remaining Defendants, Plaintiff is asked to supplement its pleadings with evidence that relates to only those defendants demonstrating that joinder is appropriate (including evidence demonstrating sale of identical products, use of same product photos, identical product descriptions, etc.). The Clerk is instructed to lift the seal on all of the filings that have been placed under seal. Mailed notice. (jcc,)
译文：在尊敬的阿普丽尔·M之前报名参赛。佩里：就原告的初步禁令动议33 36举行听证会，该动议已获得批准。正如听证会期间所述，法院对支持本案中一些被告合并诉讼的论点表示严重关切。如果被告作为一个整体就案件进行谈判，合并诉讼是适当的。同样，如果被告已与原告取得联系并且未反对合并诉讼，法院不会自发反对。对于可能多达70名剩余被告，原告被要求提供仅与证明合并诉讼适当的被告相关的证据来补充其诉状（包括证明销售相同产品、使用相同产品照片、相同产品描述等的证据）。指示书记员解封所有已封存的文件。邮寄通知。(jcc,)
|
| 12/18/2024 | MEMORANDUM order on motion for preliminary injunction, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, set deadlines/hearings, 42 by Wham Bam Systems, LLC Memorandum in Support of Joinder
译文：关于初步禁令动议的备忘录命令，设定动议和R & R截止日期/听证会，设定截止日期/听证会，42由Wham Bam Systems，LLC支持Joinder的备忘录
附件： 1:(Exhibit Exhibit A) |
| 12/18/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 5, 13, 15, 42, 66, 79, 89, and 137
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC对被告5、13、15、42、66、79、89和137发出的自愿解雇通知
|
| 12/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff epicedeals by Robert D. Kreisman
译文：罗伯特·D·罗伯特（Robert D.）为原告同名律师出庭克赖斯曼
|
| 12/16/2024 | AFFIDAVIT of Brandon Beymer regarding order on motion for preliminary injunction, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, set deadlines/hearings, 42 Affidavit of Service of Docket Entry 42 on all Defendant Subject to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
译文：布兰登·贝默（Brandon Beymer）关于初步禁令动议命令的宣誓书、设定动议和R & R截止日期/听证会、设定截止日期/听证会、42对所有被告送达案卷条目的宣誓书42受原告初步禁令动议影响
|
| 12/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: The plaintiff's motions for entry of a preliminary injunction [33 and 36] are taken under advisement. Plaintiff's motions for entry of a preliminary injunction will be heard at a hearing on 12/19/2024, at 10:00 AM. The motions may be considered unopposed as to any defendant who does not file an objection by 12/18/2024 and/or appear at the hearing. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this minute order upon all affected defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and promptly file proof of that service. The Court also sua sponte raises the propriety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) of joining the remaining 105 defendants to this action. See, e.g, Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). The Seventh Circuit has found it "appropriate for federal courts to raise improper joinder on their own, especially when the sheer number of defendants waves a joinder red flag and ups the chances that the plaintiff should be paying separate filing fees for separate cases." Id. at 186 (discussing George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007)). The necessity of sua sponte evaluation intensifies "when it would take enormous time and effort to check the evidence - such as screenshots of dozens and dozens of defendants' online stores - amassed into a single case absent actual connections between the defendants." Id. The Court expects the plaintiff to be prepared to discuss the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described above at the 12/19/2024 hearing. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 12/18/2024 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的阿普丽尔·M·佩里面前的会议记录：原告提出的进入初步禁令的动议[33和36]是经过深思熟虑的。原告要求生效初步禁令的动议将于2024年12月19日上午10：00举行听证会对于任何在2024年12月18日之前没有提出反对和/或出席听证会的被告来说，这些动议可以被认为是无人反对的。原告必须在记录在案后的一个工作日内向所有受影响的被告送达一份本会议纪要命令的副本，并迅速提交送达证明。法院还主动提出，根据联邦民事诉讼规则第20(A)(2)条，将其余105名被告加入这一诉讼是适当的。见例如，《雅诗兰黛化妆品有限公司诉合伙企业及非法人团体》，载于附表A，载于《联邦判例汇编》第334卷，第182页(北卡罗来纳州)。2020)。第七巡回法院发现，“联邦法院自行提出不正当合并是适当的，特别是当数量庞大的被告挥舞着合并红旗，增加了原告应为单独案件支付单独起诉费的可能性时。”身份证。(参见《联邦判例汇编》第三辑，第507卷，第605,607页(第七巡回法庭)]。2007))。当需要花费大量的时间和精力来检查证据--例如几十个和几十个被告的网店的截图--聚集到一个案件中而没有被告之间的实际联系时，主动起诉评估的必要性就加剧了。身份证。法院期望原告准备在2024年12月19日的听证会上根据上述原则讨论合并的适当性。在另一种情况下，原告有权在2024年12月18日之前向较小一部分被告提出修改后的申诉，并附上一份备忘录，解释为什么每个被告都与其他所有被告适当地结合在一起。邮寄的通知。
|
| 12/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Per the plaintiff's attorney request, the motion hearing set for 12/19/2024 at 10 a.m. regarding 33 and 36, attorney should appear telephonically for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: 650-479-3207, Access Code: 2307 684 8339. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jcc,)
译文：在尊敬的阿普丽尔·M之前报名参赛。佩里：根据原告律师的请求，关于33和36的动议听证会定于2024年12月12日上午10点举行，律师应拨打免费电话：650-479-3207，访问代码：2307 684 8339。公众和媒体将能够拨打电话收听这次听证会（使用免费电话）。当您不说话时，请确保手机处于静音状态。提醒获准远程访问诉讼程序的人员注意，一般禁止对法庭诉讼程序进行拍照、录音和转播。违反这些禁令可能会导致制裁，包括取消法院颁发的媒体凭证、限制参加未来的听证会、拒绝参加未来的听证会，或法院认为必要的任何其他制裁。邮寄通知。(jcc,)
|
| 12/16/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 36-38, 40, 53, 65, 68, 75, 77, 78, 87, 101, and 120
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC为被告自愿解雇的通知36-38、40、53、65、68、75、77、78、87、101和120
|
| 12/13/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wham Bam Systems, LLC as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 12/13/2024, answer due 1/3/2025.
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC于2024年12月13日就附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会执行退回传票，答复截止日期为2025年1月3日。
附件： 1:(Affidavit Affidavit of Service) |
| 12/13/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Brandon Matthew Beymer for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 36 before Honorable April M. Perry on 12/19/2024 at 10:00 AM.
译文：布兰登·马修·贝默（Brandon Matthew Beymer）向尊敬的阿普丽尔·M提交初步禁令36动议的动议通知。佩里于2024年12月19日上午10：00。
|
| 12/13/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Wham Bam Systems, LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction 36
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC的备忘录支持初步禁令36
|
| 12/13/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Wham Bam Systems, LLC for preliminary injunction as to Defendants 107-112
译文：原告Wham Bam Systems，LLC提出的对被告实施初步禁令的动议107-112
附件： 1:(Exhibit Schedule A) |
| 12/13/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Brandon Matthew Beymer for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 33 before Honorable April M. Perry on 12/19/2024 at 10:00 AM.
译文：布兰登·马修·贝默（Brandon Matthew Beymer）向尊敬的阿普丽尔·M提交初步禁令33动议的动议通知。佩里于2024年12月19日上午10：00。
|
| 12/13/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Wham Bam Systems, LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction 33
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC的备忘录支持初步禁令33
|
| 12/13/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Wham Bam Systems, LLC for preliminary injunction
译文：原告Wham Bam Systems，LLC提出初步禁令动议
附件： 1:(Exhibit Schedule A) |
| 12/13/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 17, 44, 46, 56, and 57
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC关于被告17、44、46、56和57的自愿解雇通知
|
| 12/12/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 33, 35, 45, 47, 49, 59, 61, 67, 70, 73, 76, 81, 83, 85, 88, 91, 95, 102, 121, 122, 124-130, 132-134, 138, 139, 143, 145, and 147
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC被告自愿解雇通知33、35、45、47、49、59、61、67、70、73、76、81、83、85、88、91、95、102、121、122、124-130、132-134、138、139、143、145和147
|
| 12/11/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 31 "Boicus" and 54 "Unique US"
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC为被告自愿解雇的通知31“Boicus”和54“Unique US”
|
| 12/10/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wham Bam Systems, LLC for Defendants 117 "Puxin," 118 "Longming," and 119 "Queenti"
译文：Wham Bam Systems，LLC为被告自愿解雇的通知117“Puxin”、118“Longming”和119“Queenti”
|
| 12/09/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Wham Bam Systems, LLC Template Schedule A
译文：原告Wham Bam Systems，LLC的密封文件模板附表A
|
| 12/02/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: As this case has been reassigned to Judge Perry 23, all deadlines and hearings set before Judge Kness are stricken. Mailed notice.
译文：向尊敬的约翰·F·F·前提交参赛作品。克内斯：由于此案已重新分配给佩里法官23，克内斯法官之前设定的所有截止日期和听证会均已到期。邮寄通知。
|
| 11/27/2024 | EXTENSION of Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable April M. Perry on 11/27/24.
译文：临时限制令的延长。由尊敬的阿普丽尔·M签署佩里于11/27/24。
|
| 11/27/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order until December 20, 2024 24 is granted. Enter order.
译文：在尊敬的阿普丽尔·M之前报名参赛。佩里：原告将临时限制令延长至2024年12月20日的动议24已获批准。输入顺序。
|
| 11/27/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Wham Bam Systems, LLC for extension of time to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告Wham Bam Systems，LLC提出的延长临时限制令期限的动议
|
| 11/22/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/22/2024.
译文：约翰·F·阁下签署的密封临时限制令Kness于2024年11月22日。
|
| 11/22/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order [7] and motion for electronic service of process [11] are granted in part. For the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining the equitable accounting that, at this point, Plaintiff states that it may pursue. These facts justify, among other relief, the imposition of a prejudgment asset restraint against Defendants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per separate account. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiff's trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit and infringing goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of joining all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. The disabling of domain names is appropriate to prevent infringing conduct. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的约翰·F·凯内斯面前的会议记录：原告要求临时限制令的单方面动议[7]和电子送达法律程序文件的动议[11]部分获得批准。就上述动议而言，原告的申请暂时支持根据《财务报告》第65(B)(1)条单方面进行诉讼。具体地说，如上所述，如果被告在TRO可以发布之前被告知这一程序，很可能会改变资产和网站的方向，从而破坏原告在确定被告、阻止被告的侵权行为和获得原告在这一点上可能寻求的衡平会计方面的利益。这些事实证明，除其他救济外，对被告施加预判资产限制，每个单独账户的金额不超过50,000美元。此外，最高法院认定，至少就目前而言，在这份有限而片面的记录中，在不影响重新讨论这一问题的情况下，法院对被告拥有个人管辖权，因为他们直接针对包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国消费者的商业活动。具体地说，被告通过建立和经营电子商务商店，以使用一个或多个卖家化名的美国消费者为目标，向包括伊利诺伊州在内的美国提供送货服务，接受美元付款，并使用侵权和假冒原告商标向伊利诺伊州居民销售产品，从而瞄准了伊利诺伊州居民的销售目标。提交给法院的证据还表明，原告根据案情(包括主动侵权和向伊利诺伊州销售的证据)证明了胜诉的可能性，对原告的损害是不可弥补的，并且禁令符合公共利益。由于假冒和侵权商品造成消费者困惑，禁令服务于公共利益，而指示被告停止侵权的命令并不会对他们造成相反的伤害。诉讼程序的电子送达不违反任何条约，并符合正当程序，因为它有效地将这一诉讼的悬而未决传达给被告。正如几名法官以前指出的那样，可能有理由质疑将所有被告加入这一诉讼是否适当，以及原告是否会进行会计核算(原告声称这是冻结资产的理由)，但在这个初步阶段，法院相信，原告已经提供了充分的证据表明协调活动和会计核算的可能性，以证明对所有被告提出的救济请求是合理的。禁用域名是适当的，以防止侵权行为。有必要加快发现，以确定被告和实施资产冻结。如果任何被告出庭并提出反对，法院将重新考虑资产冻结和合并。进入密封的临时限制令。邮寄的通知。
|
| 08/21/2024 | First AMENDED complaint by John Doe against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
译文：无名氏对附表A中确定的合伙企业和非法人协会的首次修改投诉
附件： 1:(Exhibit Exhibit 2) 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
| 08/20/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 13, which includes a sub rosa motion for leave to proceed anonymously, is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Conversely, there are no exceptional circumstances that would justify allowing Plaintiff to conceal either its own identity or the identity of its trademark: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for preliminary injunctive relief will be adjudicated in the ordinary course of so-called "Schedule A" litigation, and the identity of Defendants will be placed under seal during the pendency of the ex parte proceedings. Given these protections for Plaintiff's legitimate interests, the countervailing strong public interest in knowing who is seeking recourse in the federal courts compels the Court to deny Plaintiff's request to conceal its own identity, even initially. As the Seventh Circuit has explained, "We have repeatedly voiced our disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate exceptional circumstances that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 376-77 (7th Cir. 2016); see also Doe v. Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005) ("The public has an interest in knowing what the judicial system is doing, an interest frustrated when any part of litigation is conducted in secret."); Doe v. Trustees of Indiana Univ., 101 F.4th 485, 493 (7th Cir. 2024) (district judge "abused his discretion when permitting 'John Doe' to conceal his name without finding that he is a minor, is at risk of physical harm, or faces improper retaliation."). Such exceptional circumstances as to justify anonymity are not present in this case. Indeed, the volume of "Schedule A" cases filed in this District alone cuts strongly against any argument that another Schedule A case could be considered "exceptional." Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion proceed anonymously is denied. Plaintiff's motion 13 for leave to file certain documents under seal is otherwise granted. Subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file the documents appearing at docket entries 2 through 5 and 9 through 10. An amended complaint naming the Plaintiff and not obscuring its trademark must be filed on or before 8/26/2024. Failure to meet this deadline or otherwise to dismiss the case voluntarily will lead to dismissal with prejudice and the unsealing of all docket entries. All other pending motions are entered and continued. Mailed notice.
译文：在尊敬的约翰·F·凯内斯面前的分钟记录：原告要求允许在第13章下存档的动议，其中包括一项要求允许匿名进行的次级罗莎动议，部分被批准，部分被拒绝。原告的陈述表明，如果被告在执行原告请求的初步禁令救济之前得知这些程序，被告可能会销毁相关的书面证据，并将资产隐藏或转移到法院无法触及的范围，这是一个重大风险。相反，没有例外情况可以为允许原告隐瞒其自身身份或其商标的身份提供正当理由：原告的单方面初步强制令救济动议将在所谓的“附表A”诉讼的正常过程中作出裁决，而被告的身份将在单方面诉讼待决期间予以封存。鉴于这些对原告合法利益的保护，对知道谁在联邦法院寻求追索权的强烈公共利益的抵消迫使最高法院拒绝原告隐瞒自己身份的请求，即使是在最初。正如第七巡回法院所解释的那样，“我们一再表示不赞成当事人匿名诉讼，因为匿名诉讼违背了公众拥有公开司法程序的权利，也违背了公众知道谁在使用由公共税收资助的法院设施和程序的权利。要进行匿名诉讼，当事人必须证明，在特殊情况下，有利于被指认的当事人的公共政策，以及匿名可能导致的对对方的损害，都是不可取的。”无名氏诉迪尔菲尔德村案，载于《联邦判例汇编》第三辑，第819卷，第372、376-77页(第七巡回法庭见《无名氏诉史密斯》[《联邦判例汇编》第三集第429卷，第706,710页(第七巡回法庭)]。2005年)(“公众有兴趣知道司法系统在做什么，当诉讼的任何部分被秘密进行时，这种兴趣都会受挫。”)；美国能源部诉印第安纳大学受托人案，载于“联邦判例汇编”第四卷第101卷，第485,493页(第七巡回法庭。2024)(地区法官“滥用他的自由裁量权，允许‘无名氏’隐瞒他的名字，而没有发现他是未成年人，有受到身体伤害的风险，或面临不正当的报复。”)这种为匿名辩护的特殊情况在本案中并不存在。事实上，仅在该地区提起的“附表A”案件的数量就强烈反对任何认为另一个附表A案件可被视为“例外”的论点。因此，原告的匿名动议被驳回。原告第13号动议要求允许在盖章的情况下将某些文件存档，否则不予批准。根据在适当的时间开封，原告现在可以提交出现在案卷条目2到5和9到10中的文件。修改后的起诉书必须在2024年8月26日或之前提交，指明原告的名字并不模糊其商标。未能在最后期限前或以其他方式自愿驳回此案将导致带有偏见的驳回，并将打开所有议程条目。所有其他待决动议均已录入并继续进行。邮寄的通知。
|
| 08/13/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
译文：秘书通知：根据当地规则73.1（b），该法院的一名美国治安法官可以进行该民事诉讼的所有诉讼程序。如果各方同意由目前指定的美国治安法官进行本案的所有诉讼程序，包括审判、最终判决的进入和所有审判后诉讼程序，各方必须在所附的同意表上签名。本同意书只有在各方签署的情况下才有资格提交。双方还可以在任何联合文件中表示同意治安法官的管辖权，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令。
|
| 08/13/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
译文：案件分配给尊敬的约翰·F。克内斯。被指定为治安法官凯里·L.霍莱布·霍塔林。案例分配：随机分配。（民事类别2）。
|
| 08/13/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet
译文：公民封面
|
| 08/13/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Daliah Saper
译文：达莉亚·萨珀（Daliah Saper）为原告约翰·多伊（John Doe）出庭
|
| 08/13/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Brandon Matthew Beymer
译文：布兰登·马修·贝默（Brandon Matthew Beymer）为原告无名氏（John Doe）出庭律师
|
| 08/13/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe to seal document sealed document 9, sealed document, 4, sealed document 5, sealed document, 10, sealed document 3, sealed document 2
译文：原告John Doe要求密封文件的动议密封文件9，密封文件4，密封文件5，密封文件10，密封文件3，密封文件2
|
| 08/13/2024 | MEMORANDUM by John Doe in support of motion for service by publication 11
译文：约翰·多伊（John Doe）的备忘录支持出版物11的送达动议
|
| 08/13/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for service by publication
译文：原告John Doe提出的通过出版物送达的动议
|
| 08/13/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Declaration of Plaintiff in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告John Doe的密封文件原告支持临时限制令动议的声明
附件： 1:(Exhibit Exhibit 3C) 2:Exhibit Exhibit 3B 3:Exhibit Exhibit 3A 4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 5:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
| 08/13/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Unredacted Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order
译文：原告John Doe的密封文件未经编辑的备忘录，支持原告申请临时限制令的动议
|
| 08/13/2024 | MEMORANDUM by John Doe in support of motion for temporary restraining order 7 Redacted Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order
译文：约翰·多伊（John Doe）支持临时限制令动议的备忘录7支持原告申请临时限制令的修订备忘录
|
| 08/13/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for temporary restraining order
译文：原告无名氏提出的临时限制令动议
|
| 08/13/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by John Doe
译文：John Doe根据当地规则3.2通知附属公司
|
| 08/13/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Notice of Trademark Claim
译文：原告John Doe的密封文件商标索赔通知
|
| 08/13/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Unredacted Complaint
译文：原告John Doe的密封文件未经编辑的投诉
附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 to the Unredacted Complaint 2:Exhibit Exhibit 2 to the Unredacted Complaint 3:(Exhibit Schedule A to the Unredacted Complaint) |
| 08/13/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Schedule A to the Redacted Complaint
译文：原告John Doe的密封文件已编辑投诉的附表A
|
| 08/13/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit 1 to the Redacted Complaint
译文：原告John Doe的密封文件已编辑投诉的证据1
|
| 08/13/2024 | COMPLAINT Redacted Complaint filed by John Doe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22357016.
译文：投诉无名氏提交的已编辑投诉;陪审团要求。备案费405美元，收据号AILNDC-22357016。
附件： 1:(Exhibit Exhibit 2 to the redacted Complaint) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
