2026-cv-05064 AI分析
05/06/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal 5 but reminds counsel that all motions must be noticed for presentment. Additionally, if, as indicated, Plaintiff plans to pursue expedited discovery, it must ensure that it has a good faith factual and legal basis for its jurisdictional allegations and can fairly represent that defendant has, in fact, shipped infringing products to residents of Illinois, and not just in connection with Plaintiff's test buys. See, e.g., uBID, Inc. v. The GoDaddy Group, Inc., 623 F.3d 421 (7th Cir. 2010) (instructing that a "defendant's deliberate and continuous exploitation of the market in a forum state, accomplished through its website as well as through other contacts with the state, can be sufficient to establish specific personal jurisdiction."); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) (cautioning that "if having an interactive website were enough in situations like this one, there is no limiting principlea plaintiff could sue everywhere. Such a result would violate the principles on which Walden and Daimler rest. Having an 'interactive website' (which hardly rules out anything in 2014 [and less in 2026]) should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible. To hold otherwise would offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'") (quoting Int'l Shoe Co. v. State of Wash., Off. of Unemployment Comp. & Placement, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945)); Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277, 285 (2014) (noting that the Supreme Court has "consistently rejected attempts to satisfy the defendant-focused 'minimum contacts' inquiry by demonstrating contacts between the plaintiff (or third parties) and the forum State"; "however significant the plaintiff's contacts with the forum may be, those contacts cannot be 'decisive in determining whether the defendant' s due process rights are violated.'") (quoting Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320, 332 (1980)). Finally, because it appears that Plaintiff's counsel is a member of the general bar but not the trial bar, see 2, the Court reminds counsel that strict compliance with LR 83.12 is expected. Mailed notice. 翻译
05/01/2026
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
05/01/2026
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). 翻译
05/01/2026
COMPLAINT filed by Juanren Wu; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25059377. 翻译
附件：
1:Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Design Patent
2:Exhibit 2 - U.S. Customs and Border Protection Report
3:Exhibit 3 - Chow Article
4:(Exhibit 4 - Department of Homeland Security Report)
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
