2024-cv-21516 AI分析
日期 | 描述 |
---|---|
11/22/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Return of Cash Bond (DE 85) ("Motion"). Upon review of the record and the Motion, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion (DE 85) is GRANTED. The bond posted by Plaintiff in the amount of $10,000 (DE 28) plus any accrued interest is ordered to be released by the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff's counsel: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, c/o Daniel Humphrey. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/22/2024. (rm04)
译文:无纸化订单。本案已提交法院审理,原告提出的返还现金保证金动议(DE 85)(“动议”)。在审查记录和动议后,下令并裁定批准该动议(DE 85)。法院书记员下令将原告缴纳的金额为10,000美元(DE 28)的保证金加上任何应计利息释放给原告的律师:Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,LLP,c/o Daniel Humphrey。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年11月22日。(rm04)
|
11/21/2024 | Clerk's Notice to Filer re [85] Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs.
译文:书记员向文件人发出的关于[85]杂项救济动议的通知。文件员选择了错误的运动救济;错误-文件员在归档运动时选择了错误的运动救济。职员进行了更正。没有必要重新提交本文件,但未来提交的动议必须包括适用的救济。
|
11/20/2024 | STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:Roadget Business Pte.关于解雇联合的规定。公司
|
11/20/2024 | Unopposed MOTION for Return of Cash Bond re [27] Order on Ex Parte Motion, by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:未反对的现金债券返还动议重新[27]关于单方面动议的命令,由Roadget Business Pte.公司
附件: 1:Text of Proposed Order |
10/22/2024 | FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE.
译文:表格AO 121发送给美国版权办公室主任。
附件: 1:(Paperless order at DE#83) (scn) |
10/22/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Notice of Settlement (DE 81) indicating that the Parties have reached a settlement of this matter. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before November 20, 2024, the Parties shall file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the Parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction beyond the filing of their joint stipulation, they are advised that they must file the settlement agreement for review and any stipulation must comply with the Eleventh Circuit's holding in Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012). Otherwise, the dismissal of this matter is effective and self-executing upon the filing of the Parties' joint stipulation of dismissal. Id. All hearings and deadlines are CANCELED. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This case is CLOSED for administrative purposes. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/22/2024. (rm04)
译文:要求联合规定解雇和行政结案的无纸化命令。该事项已提交法院关于和解通知(DE 81)的说明,表明当事各方已就该事项达成和解。据此,裁定于2024年11月20日及之前,双方当事人提出解除合同的联合规定。如果当事各方希望法院在提交其共同条款之后保留管辖权,则建议他们必须提交和解协议以供审查,并且任何条款都必须符合第十一巡回法院在Anago Francing,Inc.诉Shaz,LLC案[《联邦判例汇编》第三集第677卷第1272页(第11巡回法庭)]一案中的规定。2012年)。否则,本事项的撤销生效,自当事人提出共同撤销规定之日起自动执行。身份证。所有听证会和最后期限都被取消。所有悬而未决的动议都被拒绝,因为这是没有意义的。出于行政目的,此案已结案。凯瑟琳·M·威廉姆斯法官于2024年10月22日签署。(RM04)
|
10/21/2024 | NOTICE of Settlement by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:Roadget Business Pte.的和解通知公司
|
10/07/2024 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order issued by this Court on June 28, 2024 (ECF 27), and extended to July 26 (ECF 30), until the Court is able to adjudicate Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction. Objections to R&R due by 10/21/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 10/7/2024. See attached document for full details.
译文:报告和建议涉及31名原告的非当事人动议,要求延长本法院于2024年6月28日发布的临时限制令(ECF 27),并延长至7月26日(ECF 30),直至法院能够对原告提出的初步禁令动议做出裁决。对R & R的异议应于2024年10月21日之前提交。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年7月10日签署。有关完整详细信息,请参阅随附文件。
|
10/01/2024 | Defendant's NOTICE of Filing Proposed Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS re 70 Order
译文:被告关于就原告初步禁令动议提出报告和建议的通知被告1、沉东科技有限公司有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,店名:美昌,被告三,企业名:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,店名:YUEFSE re 70 Order
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order Report and Recommendation on Preliminary Injunction Motion) |
10/01/2024 | NOTICE of Striking 77 Notice (Other), filed by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS
译文:被告1、沉东科技有限公司提交的《打击77通知(其他)》通知有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告3,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,企业名称:YUEFS,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,店铺名称:被告一美昌,沉东科技有限公司有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:YUEFS
|
10/01/2024 | Clerk's Notice to Filer re 77 Notice (Other). Proposed Order Docketed as Main Document; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS - Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then resubmit the proposed order as instructed in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures.
译文:书记员致文件人的通知77通知(其他)。拟议订单作为主要文件归档;需要在3天内采取纠正行动-备案人必须提交罢工通知,然后按照CM/ECF行政程序中的指示重新提交拟议订单。
|
09/30/2024 | STRICKEN per DE 79. NOTICE of Filing Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS re 70 Order Modified on 10/2/2024
译文:根据DE 79,斯特林。被告一、沉东科技有限公司关于原告提出初步禁令的报告和建议的通知有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告3,企业名称:广州市天河区田园妙妙服装店,厂名:YUEFSE re 70 Order于2024年10月2日修改
|
09/30/2024 | ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS.
译文:被告3对陪审团要求投诉的答复和肯定辩护,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:YUEFS。
|
09/30/2024 | ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size.
译文:被告1对陪审团要求投诉的答复和肯定辩护,沉阳雷电科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporike Plus Size。
|
09/30/2024 | ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang.
译文:被告2对陪审团要求投诉的答复和肯定辩护,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,厂名:美昌。
|
09/30/2024 | Plaintiff's NOTICE of Filing Proposed Report and Recommendation Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. re 70 Order
译文:原告关于提交拟议报告和建议的通知Roadget Business Pte.批准原告初步禁令的动议。有限公司re 70订单
附件: 1:(Exhibit) |
09/27/2024 | Hearing(s) DE# 58 terminated.
译文:听证会DE# 58终止。
|
09/25/2024 | NOTICE of Compliance by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS re 70 Order
译文:被告1、沉东科技有限公司合规通知有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,店名:美昌,被告三,企业名:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,店名:YUEFSE re 70 Order
附件: 1:(Exhibit 1 - Email Correspondence) |
09/25/2024 | NOTICE of Compliance by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. re 70 Order
译文:Roadget Business Pte.的合规通知有限公司re 70订单
附件: 1:(Exhibit) |
09/24/2024 | POST-HEARING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER re 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 9/24/2024. See attached document for full details.
译文:第31条听证后行政命令原告提出的实施初步禁令的动议。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年9月24日签署。有关完整详细信息,请参阅随附文件。
|
09/24/2024 | PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman: Evidentiary Motion Hearing held on 9/24/2024 re 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order. Post-Hearing Administrative Order to follow. Total time in court: 1 hour(s) : 30 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Joel Benjamin Rothman, Angela Nieves, Phillip A. Hill, Sara Dennis, Daniel L. Humphrey, Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. (Digital JG-13:28:57)
译文:治安法官乔纳森·古德曼(Jonathan Goodman)审理的诉讼程序的无纸分钟录入:2024年9月24日举行证据动议听证会,讨论原告延长临时限制令的第31部分动议。听证后行政命令将遵循。法庭总时间:1小时:30分钟。律师出庭:Joel Benjamin Rothman、Angela Nieves、Phillip A希尔、萨拉·丹尼斯、丹尼尔·L。汉弗莱,法庭记者:Sharon Velazco,305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd. uscours.gov.(Digital JG-13:28:57)
|
09/24/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER re 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order issued by this Court on June 28, 2024 (ECF 27), and extended to July 26 (ECF 30), until the Court is able to adjudicate Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunc filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Concerning this afternoon's evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction, each side shall have a total of one and a half hours to conduct direct, redirect and cross, so counsel should use focused questioning. In addition, each side will file a proposed Report and Recommendations on the preliminary injunction motion on or before September 30, 2024. The submission may not exceed ten double-spaced pages, excluding signature block and certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 9/24/2024.
译文:无纸命令re 31原告的非方动议,延长本法院于2024年6月28日发布的临时限制令(ECF 27),并延长至7月26日(ECF 30),直到法院能够对原告提出的进入初步Injunc的动议作出裁决Roadget Business Pte.关于今天下午就原告初步禁令动议举行的证据听证会,双方总共有一个半小时的时间进行直接、转移和交叉,因此律师应采用重点质询。此外,双方将于2024年9月30日或之前就初步禁令动议提交拟议的报告和建议。提交的文件不得超过十页双倍间距,不包括签名块和服务证书。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年9月24日签署。
|
09/18/2024 | WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size waiver sent on 9/18/2024, response/answer due 9/30/2024.
译文:由Roadget Business Pte.执行退回的服务放弃。被告1、沉东科技有限公司有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size豁免于2024年9月18日发送,回复/答复截止日期为2024年9月30日。
|
09/18/2024 | WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang waiver sent on 9/18/2024, response/answer due 9/30/2024.
译文:由Roadget Business Pte.执行退回的服务放弃。被告二有限公司,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌豁免于2024年9月18日发送,回复/答复截止日期为2024年9月30日。
|
09/18/2024 | WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS waiver sent on 9/18/2024, response/answer due 9/30/2024.
译文:由Roadget Business Pte.执行退回的服务放弃。被告三有限公司,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,厂名:YUEFS弃权书于2024年9月18日发送,回复/答复截止日期:2024年9月30日。
|
09/18/2024 | Reset Response/Answer Due Deadlines per DE#64: Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size response/answer due 9/30/2024; Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang response/answer due 9/30/2024; Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS response/answer due 9/30/2024; The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto response/answer due 9/30/2024.
译文:根据DE#64重置回复/答复截止日期:被告1,沉阳雷电科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size回复/答复截止日期:2024年9月30日;被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌回应/答复截止日期:2024年9月30日;被告3,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:YUEFS回应/答复截止日期:2024年9月30日;附表A上确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会回复/答复截止日期:2024年9月30日。
|
09/18/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte and on Defendants' response to the Court's September 16, 2024 Order to Show Cause. (DE 63.) Embedded in the response is an unopposed request by Defendants to have until September 30, 2024 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. The Court will grant this request but moving forward, Defendants must properly file motions such that they are accurately registered in the CM/ECF system and on the case docket. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before September 30, 2024. The Parties are advised that the September 24, 2024 preliminary injunction hearing before Judge Goodman will not be rescheduled. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/18/2024. (rm04)
译文:无纸化订单。此案由法院自行审理,并由被告对法院2024年9月16日的举证令的回应审理。(DE 63.)回复中包含被告提出的一项无人反对的请求,要求其在2024年9月30日之前对原告的投诉做出回应。法院将批准这一请求,但今后,被告必须正确提出动议,以便在CM/ECF系统和案件记录表中准确登记。因此,命令并调整被告应于2024年9月30日或之前对原告的投诉作出回应。双方被告知,古德曼法官2024年9月24日举行的初步禁令听证会不会重新安排。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年9月18日。(rm04)
|
09/17/2024 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 62 Order to Show Cause, by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS.
译文:被告1,沉东科技有限公司,对62号举证令的答复有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order) |
09/16/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER. On August 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice reflecting that all Defendants had been served by July 19, 2024, making Defendants' answer(s) to the Complaint due no later than August 9, 2024. (DE 38.) To date, Defendants have not filed a responsive pleading to the Complaint. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that the Clerk must enter default against a defendant who has failed to plead or otherwise defend. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants shall SHOW CAUSE no later than September 17, 2024 why the Clerk should not be directed to enter default against Defendants. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/16/2024. (rm04)
译文:无纸化订单。2024年8月2日,原告提交了一份通知,反映所有被告已于2024年7月19日之前送达,并要求被告对诉状的答复不迟于2024年8月9日到期。(DE 38.)迄今为止,被告尚未对诉状提出回应性抗辩。《联邦民事诉讼规则》规定,书记员必须对未能抗辩或以其他方式辩护的被告违约。因此,命令并调整被告应在2024年9月17日之前出示理由,说明为什么不应指示书记员对被告违约。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年9月16日。(rm04)
|
09/16/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 60 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Sara J. Dennis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 9/16/2024.
译文:无纸命令批准60项出庭动议,同意指定,并请求电子接收律师Sara J. Dennis的电子备案通知。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年9月16日签署。
|
09/13/2024 | MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Sara J. Dennis. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17834514 by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Responses due by 9/27/2024.
译文:出庭动议副主席、同意指定并请求以电子方式接收Sara J. Dennis的电子备案通知。备案费$200.00收据# AFLSDC-17834514,由Roadget Business Pte.有限公司。回复日期为2024年9月27日。
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order) |
09/11/2024 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order issued by this Court on June 28, 2024 (ECF 27), and extended to July 26 (ECF 30), until the Court is able to adjudicate Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunc filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:对第31号动议的回应原告的非方动议的回应,该动议旨在延长本法院于2024年6月28日发布的临时限制令(ECF 27),并延长至7月26日(ECF 30),直到法院能够对原告提出的进入初步Injunc的动议作出裁决Roadget Business Pte.公司
|
09/09/2024 | PAPERLESS Order Resetting Zoom Preliminary Injunction Hearing from 9/13/24 to 9/24/2024 at 01:30 PM in the Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. The Zoom information, as mentioned in ECF No. 51, will remain the same. Additionally, the TRO will remain in force until the Court rules on the preliminary injunction motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 9/9/2024.
译文:无纸化命令重置Zoom初步禁令听证会于2024年9月13日至9月24日下午01:30在迈阿密分区举行,治安法官乔纳森·古德曼(Jonathan Goodman)主持。ECF No. 51中提到的Zoom信息将保持不变。此外,TRO将继续有效,直到法院对初步禁令动议做出裁决。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年9月9日签署。
|
09/06/2024 | RESPONSE in Opposition re 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order issued by this Court on June 28, 2024 (ECF 27), and extended to July 26 (ECF 30), until the Court is able to adjudicate Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunc filed by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS. Replies due by 9/13/2024.
译文:对第31条反对意见的回应原告提出的非方动议,要求延长本法院于2024年6月28日发布的临时限制令(ECF 27),并延长至7月26日(ECF 30),直至法院能够对原告提出的进入初步禁令的动议作出裁决,被告1,沉东科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。应于2024年9月13日之前回复。
附件: 1:Declaration of Yang Dong 2:Declaration of Chen Long 3:Declaration of Liu Ming 4:Temu Custodial Declaration 5:Declaration of Joel Rothman 6:Exhibit A 7:Exhibit B 8:Exhibit C 9:(Exhibit D) |
09/06/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER striking Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (DE 55). The filing violates Local Rule 7.1(a)(2) because it is not accompanied by a proposed order and it violates Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) because it does not contain the certification of conferral. Moreover, the Motion provides no legal authority to support the requested relief, and it does not advise of the current deadline for Defendants to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/6/2024. (rm04)
译文:驳回被告延长投诉回复时间的动议的无纸命令(DE 55)。该申请违反了当地规则7.1(a)(2),因为它没有附带拟议的命令,并且违反了当地规则7.1(a)(3),因为它不包含授予证明。此外,该动议没有提供支持所请求的救济的法律依据,也没有建议被告回应投诉的当前截止日期。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年9月6日。(rm04)
|
09/05/2024 | (STRICKEN PER DE#56) Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to complaint until September 25, 2024 re 1 Complaint, by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS. Responses due by 9/19/2024. Modified text on 9/6/2024
译文:(根据DE #56严格规定)延长对投诉作出回应的时间至2024年9月25日的未反对动议re 1投诉,由被告1,沉阳雷东科技有限公司有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。应于2024年9月19日之前回复。修改文本于2024年9月6日
|
08/24/2024 | Reset Deadlines per DE#54 as to 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order issued by this Court on June 28, 2024 (ECF 27), and extended to July 26 (ECF 30), until the Court is able to adjudicate Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 9/6/2024. Replies due by 9/11/2024.
译文:根据DE#54重置截止日期,涉及31原告的非方动议,延长本法院于2024年6月28日发布的临时限制令(ECF 27),并延长至7月26日(ECF 30),直到法院能够对原告提出的初步禁令的动议做出裁决。回复日期为2024年9月6日。应于2024年9月11日之前回复。
|
08/24/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 52 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion for Preliminary Injunction 31. Defendants' response is now due by September 6, 2024, and Plaintiff's reply is due by September 11, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/23/2024.
译文:无纸命令批准52名被告延长提交回应时间的动议/对初步禁令动议的答复31。被告的答复日期为2024年9月6日,原告的答复日期为2024年9月11日。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年8月23日签署。
|
08/23/2024 | NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order Granting Motion and Setting Briefing Schedule by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS
译文:被告1、沉东科技有限公司关于提交拟议命令批准动议并制定简报时间表的通知有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:YUEFS
|
08/23/2024 | Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 31 Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to extend the Temporary Restraining Order issued by this Court on June 28, 2024 (ECF 27), and extended to July 26 (ECF 30), until the Court is able to adjudicate Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunc by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS.
译文:关于延长提交回应/答复/答复的同意动议31原告的非方动议延长本法院于2024年6月28日发布的临时限制令(ECF 27),并延长至7月26日(ECF 30),直至法院能够对原告提出的申请作出裁决被告1、沉东科技有限公司提出初步起诉的动议有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。
|
08/09/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 50 Defendants' Motion to Continue. The Preliminary Injunction Hearing originally scheduled for August 13, 2024 is now reset to September 13, 2024 at 01:30 PM in the Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman via Zoom. The TRO will remain in force until then, by agreement. The Zoom hearing login information is as follows:Meeting ID: 160 718 6605; Passcode: 014801;https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1607186605?pwd=y2tBCHbDsbFeGaCighhsrmuzD2oBoM.1 Each participant needs to log in ten minutes early, to make sure there are no glitches. This Zoom hearing is the digital equivalent of an actual, in-court hearing, so counsel are expected to dress as though they are in an actual federal courtroom. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/9/2024.
译文:批准50名被告继续动议的无纸化命令。迈阿密地区治安法官乔纳森·古德曼通过Zoom举行的初步禁令听证会原定于2024年8月13日举行,现在改为2024年9月13日下午1点30分举行。根据协议,在此之前,《贸易促进法》将继续有效。Zoom听证会登录信息如下:会议ID:1607186605;密码:014801;https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1607186605?pwd=y2tBCHbDsbFeGaCighhsrmuzD2oBoM.1每位参与者需要提前10分钟登录,以确保没有故障。这场Zoom听证会相当于实际的法庭听证会,因此律师应该穿得像在实际的联邦法庭上一样。对获准远程观看诉讼程序的人提醒,一般禁止对法庭程序进行摄影、录音和转播。违反这些禁令可能会导致制裁,包括取消法院颁发的媒体证书、限制进入未来的听证会、拒绝进入未来的听证会或法院认为必要的任何其他制裁。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年8月9日签署。
|
08/09/2024 | Unopposed MOTION to Continue Preliminary Injunction Hearing AMENDED by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS. Responses due by 8/23/2024.
译文:继续初步禁令听证的不可反对动议被告1修改,沉阳雷动科技有限公司有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。应于2024年8月23日之前回复。
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order) |
08/08/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER re 47 Order on Motion to Continue. The Undersigned is no longer available on 8/27 at 1:30 PM. If the parties wish to reschedule the preliminary injunction hearing then they can provide a list of dates where they are available between August 28th and September 13th, with the understanding that the TRO would need to be extended, by agreement through the end of the rescheduled hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/8/2024.
译文:无纸化命令re 47关于继续动议的命令。以下签署人将于8月27日下午1:30不再可用。如果各方希望重新安排初步禁令听证会,则可以提供8月28日至9月13日之间的日期列表,但有一项理解,即TRO需要通过协议延长至重新安排的听证会结束。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年8月8日签署。
|
08/08/2024 | NOTICE of Compliance re 46 Order on Motion to Unseal Document. (Document Nos. 7, 14, 15, 18, 24, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 Unsealed)
译文:第46条解封文件动议令的合规通知。(文件号7、14、15、18、24、27、29、30、31、32和33未密封)
|
08/08/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice 45 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Continue. The Undersigned will be teaching at the University of Miami Law School on the morning of August 27th but is willing to reschedule the hearing to August 27th at 1:30 PM. If that works for the parties and counsel then Defendants may file an amended motion to reschedule the hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/8/2024.
译文:无纸命令在没有偏见的情况下否认45名被告的未被反对的继续动议。以下签署人将于8月27日上午在迈阿密大学法学院任教,但愿意将听证会重新安排至8月27日下午1:30举行。如果这对当事人和律师有效,那么被告可以提出修改后的动议,重新安排听证会。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年8月8日签署。
|
08/08/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 44 Motion to Unseal Document Nos. 7, 14, 15, 18, 24, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/8/2024.
译文:无纸命令授予44项解封文件号动议7、14、15、18、24、27、29、30、31、32和33。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年8月8日签署。
|
08/08/2024 | Unopposed MOTION to Continue Preliminary Injunction Hearing by Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS. Responses due by 8/22/2024.
译文:被告1、沉东科技有限公司提出继续初步禁令听证的不可反对动议有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。应于2024年8月22日之前回复。
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order) |
08/07/2024 | MOTION to Unseal Document Nos. 7, 14, 15, 18, 24, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Responses due by 8/21/2024.
译文:解封文件编号的动议7、14、15、18、24、27、29、30、31、32和33作者:Roadget Business Pte.有限公司。回复日期为2024年8月21日。
|
08/06/2024 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Layla Nguyen on behalf of Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS. Attorney Layla Nguyen added to party Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size(pty:dft), Attorney Layla Nguyen added to party Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang(pty:dft), Attorney Layla Nguyen added to party Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS(pty:dft).
译文:Layla Nguyen代表被告1、沉东科技有限公司出庭的律师通知书有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。律师Layla Nguyen添加到被告1,沉阳雷电科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size(pty:dft),律师Layla Nguyen添加至被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌(pty:dft),律师Layla Nguyen添加至被告3,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,店名:YUEFS(pty:dft)。
|
08/06/2024 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Angela Nieves on behalf of Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS. Attorney Angela Nieves added to party Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size(pty:dft), Attorney Angela Nieves added to party Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang(pty:dft), Attorney Angela Nieves added to party Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS(pty:dft).
译文:Angela Nieves代表被告1、沉东科技有限公司出庭的律师通知书有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌,被告三,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,商店名称:岳。律师Angela Nieves添加到被告1,沉阳雷电科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporlike Plus Size(pty:dft),律师Angela Nieves添加至被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:美昌(pty:dft),律师Angela Nieves添加至被告3,企业名称:广州市天河区田园妙妙服装店,店名:YUEFS(pty:dft)。
|
08/06/2024 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joel Benjamin Rothman on behalf of Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS, Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang, Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size. Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman added to party Defendant 3, Business Name: Guangzhou Tianhe District Tianyuan Miaomiao Clothing Store, Store Name: YUEFS(pty:dft), Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman added to party Defendant 2, Business Name: Quanzhou Meichang Garment Co., Ltd., Store Name: Meichang(pty:dft), Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman added to party Defendant 1, Shenyang Leidong Technology Co., Ltd., Store Name: Sporlike Plus Size(pty:dft).
译文:Joel Benjamin Rothman代表被告3出庭的律师通知书,企业名称:广州市天河区田园妙妙服装店,企业名称:YUEFS,被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,店铺名称:美昌,被告一,沉东科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporike Plus Size。律师Joel Benjamin Rothman添加到当事人被告3,企业名称:广州市天河区天源妙妙服装店,企业名称:YOEFFS(pty:dft),律师Joel Benjamin Rothman添加到当事人被告2,企业名称:全州美昌服装有限公司,有限公司,店铺名称:美昌(pty:dft),律师Joel Benjamin Rothman添加至被告1,沉东科技有限公司,有限公司,商店名称:Sporike Plus Size(pty:dft)。
|
08/06/2024 | Clerk's Notice to Filer re 39 Notice of Attorney Appearance. Parties/Mediator Not Added; ERROR - The Filer failed to add all parties from the complaint/petition/removal, etc. or the mediator. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF and add the additional parties/mediator.
译文:书记员致文件人的通知39律师出庭通知。未添加当事人/调解人;错误-文件人未能添加投诉/请愿/罢免等中的所有当事人或调解人。指示归档人提交CM/ECF中列出的各方加入通知,并添加额外的各方/调解员。
|
08/06/2024 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joel Benjamin Rothman on behalf of The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto. Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman added to party The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto(pty:dft).
译文:Joel Benjamin Rothman代表附表A中确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会出庭的律师通知。律师Joel Benjamin Rothman添加了附表A上确定的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非法人协会(pty:dft)。
|
08/02/2024 | NOTICE of Compliance by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:Roadget Business Pte.的合规通知公司
附件: 1:Exhibit A 2:Exhibit B 3:(Exhibit C) |
08/02/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification Regarding Docket No. 33. (DE 36.) Plaintiff may provide Third Party Provider Temu the Court's July 26, 2024 Order (DE 33) in order to effectuate its terms. However, Plaintiff is advised that the premise of its motion--that the Court's Order (DE 33) included an instruction to "not allow it to be seen by unauthorized persons"--is mistaken. That language appears nowhere in the Court's Order or on the docket; it is an autogenerated message noticed in every electronic sealed filing to remind court staff of the sealed nature of the document. The question of authorization is addressed in the Court's Order (DE 27). Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/2/2024. (rm04)
译文:无纸化订单。本案已提交法院审理,原告就第33号案件提出澄清动议。(DE 36.)原告可以向第三方提供商Temu提供法院2024年7月26日的命令(DE 33),以实施其条款。然而,原告被告知,其动议的前提--法院命令(DE 33)包括“不允许未经授权的人看到它”的指示--是错误的。这种语言在法院的命令或备审记录中没有出现过;这是一条自动生成的消息,在每个电子密封文件中都会注意到,以提醒法院工作人员文件的密封性质。授权问题在法院命令(DE 27)中得到了解决。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年2月8日。(rm04)
|
07/31/2024 | Plaintiff's MOTION for clarification Regarding Docket No. 33 by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Responses due by 8/14/2024.
译文:原告关于Roadget Business Pte.第33号案件的澄清动议。有限公司。回复日期为2024年8月14日。
|
07/30/2024 | SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 35 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (1997354)
译文:系统条目-案卷条目35 [misc]限制/密封,直至另行通知。(1997354)
|
07/29/2024 | SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 34 [order] restricted/sealed until further notice.
译文:系统条目-案卷条目34 [命令]限制/密封,直至另行通知。
|
07/26/2024 | SEALED OMNIBUS PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte and on Plaintiff's ex parte Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order (DE 32). Upon review of the motion and the record it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Motion (DE 32) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Temporary Restraining Order is extended until August 13, 2024. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (DE 31) is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for a report and recommendation and a HEARING is set before Judge Goodman regarding the Motion (DE 31) on August 13, 2024. 3. On June 17, 2024, Judge Goodman granted Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Authorizing Alternative Service of Process (DE 26), authorized alternate service of process on Defendants via email, and ordered Plaintiff to "file a copy of delivery confirmation (or substantially equivalent document) as proof that service has been carried out upon Defendants, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(2(B)." Accordingly, Plaintiff shall immediately file proof of service upon Defendants. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/26/2024. (mso) Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024
译文:密封的综合无纸化订单。此事由法院自行提出,并根据原告单方面提出的延长临时限制令的动议(DE 32)。在审查动议和记录后,命令和判决如下:1.动议(DE 32)部分被批准,部分被驳回。临时限制令延长至2024年8月13日。2.根据《美国法典》第28编第636节和《佛罗里达州南区地方规则》的治安法官规则,原告的初步禁令动议(DE 31)已提交治安法官乔纳森·古德曼提出报告和建议,并将于2024年8月13日向古德曼法官就动议(DE 31)举行听证会。3.2024年6月17日,古德曼法官批准了原告的动议,批准了一项命令,授权替代送达法律程序文件(DE 26),授权通过电子邮件向被告替代送达法律程序文件,并命令原告“按照联邦民事诉讼规则4(L)(2(B)的要求,提交交付确认书(或实质上同等的文件)的副本,以证明已向被告进行了送达。”因此,原告应立即向被告提交送达证明。凯瑟琳·M·威廉姆斯法官于2024年7月26日签署。(MSO)根据DE 46于2024年8月8日修改为解封
|
07/23/2024 | Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION to Extend Temporary Restraining Order by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:原告提出的延长Roadget Business Pte.临时限制令的单独动议。公司
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order) Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024 (amb) |
07/23/2024 | PLAINTIFF ROADGET BUSINESS PTE. LTD.'S MOTION AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW FOR ENTRY OF A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION.
译文:PLAINTIFF ROADGET Business Pe.公司加入初步工会的动议和支持法律备忘录。
附件: 1:Exhibit 2:(Text of Proposed Order) Modified text on 7/24/2024 (scn). Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024 (amb) |
07/11/2024 | SEALED ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER granting 29 Ex Parte Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 7/11/2024. See attached document for full details. (pcs) Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024
译文:授予单方面延期动议的密封令延长临时限制令,授予29单方面动议。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年11月7日签署。有关完整详细信息,请参阅随附文件。(pcs)2024年8月8日根据DE 46修改为解封
|
07/10/2024 | Plaintiff's EX PARTE MOTION (Expedited) to Extend Temporary Restraining Order by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:原告提出的临时限制令(加快)延长Roadget Business Pte.的临时限制令。公司
附件: 1:(Text of Proposed Order) Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024 (amb) |
07/03/2024 | Clerks Receipt for deposit into the registry of the court (DE#27) received on 7/3/2024 in the amount of $ 10,000.00, receipt number FLS288904 by plaintiff.
译文:文员原告于2024年7月3日收到存入法院登记处(DE#27)的收据,金额为10,000.00美元,收据编号FLS 288904。
|
06/28/2024 | SEALED ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF granting 7 Ex Parte Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 6/28/2024. See attached document for full details. (pcs) Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024
译文:密封令原告的强制救济申请批准7单方动议。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年6月28日签署。有关完整详细信息,请参阅随附文件。(pcs)2024年8月8日根据DE 46修改为解封
|
06/17/2024 | SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 26 [order] restricted/sealed until further notice.
译文:系统条目-案卷条目26 [命令]限制/密封,直至另行通知。
|
06/14/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge for ECF Nos. 6 and 7 (DE 22) in which Plaintiff indicates that it consents to jurisdiction by the magistrate judge for all further proceedings with respect to documents under seal at DE 6 and DE 7. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, and in accordance with Plaintiff's consent, DE 6 and DE 7 are REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman to take all necessary and proper action as authorized by law. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/14/2024. (rm04)
译文:无纸化订单。本案已提交法院审理,原告同意在美国地方法官面前审理ECF No. 6和7(DE 22),其中原告表示同意治安法官对DE 6和DE 7处盖章文件的所有进一步诉讼的管辖权。根据28 U.S. C第636条和佛罗里达州南区地方规则的治安官规则,并根据原告同意,DE 6和DE 7被移交给美国治安法官乔纳森·古德曼,以采取法律授权的一切必要和适当的行动。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年6月14日。(rm04)
|
06/13/2024 | Sealed Document COMPLAINT re DE# 23 Order on Motion to Seal, by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024
译文:密封文件投诉DE# 23关于密封动议的命令,由Roadget Business Pte.有限公司于2024年8月8日根据DE 46修改为解封
|
06/12/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 5 Plaintiff's Motion to Seal. Plaintiff wants to file an unredacted, amended Complaint and then move to unseal it after its "motions for ex parte relief are complete through service of this Order the Court may grant and compliance by the served entities." [ECF No. 5, pp. 3-4]. Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the record, and applicable law, the Court finds good cause to seal this matter because Plaintiff's interest in protecting confidential information outweighs the common law right of access. See Romero v. Drummond Co., 480 F.3d 1234, 1246 (11th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff may file an amended, unredacted Complaint and shall file move to unseal the case once the events outlined above have occurred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 6/12/2024.
译文:批准5原告盖章动议的无纸命令。原告希望提交一份未经编辑的、修改的诉状,然后在“通过送达法院可能授予的本命令完成单方面救济动议并得到送达实体的遵守后采取解封行动。””[ECF第5号,第20页。3-4]。在审查原告的动议、记录和适用法律后,法院发现有充分理由结案此事,因为原告保护机密信息的利益超过了普通法的访问权。参见罗梅罗诉德拉蒙德公司案,480 F.3d 1234,1246(第11环。2007年)。一旦发生上述事件,原告可以提交修改后的、未编辑的投诉书,并应提交解封案件的动议。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年12月6日签署。
|
06/11/2024 | Plaintiff's Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties as to ECF Nos. 6 and 7. Filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:各方签署的原告通知和对管辖权的同意美国治安法官关于ECF No. 6和图7由Roadget Business Pte提交。公司
|
06/11/2024 | NOTICE of Striking 20 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
译文:Roadget Business Pte.提交的美国治安法官同意管辖权的通知20条通知。Ltd. by Roadget Business Pte.公司
|
06/11/2024 | STRICKEN per DE 21. Plaintiff's Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge NOT SIGNED by all parties. Filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Modified on 6/11/2024
译文:根据DE 21,严格遵守规定。原告对管辖权的通知和同意美国治安法官未经各方签署。由Roadget Business Pte提交。有限公司于2024年11月6日修改
|
05/29/2024 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorneys Yuval Mor, Phillip A. Hill, Michael E. Williams,Kevin B. Collins, and Jonathan M. Sperling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 5/29/2024.
译文:无纸命令批准9、10、11、12和13项出庭动议、同意指定以及请求以电子方式接收律师尤瓦尔·莫尔(Yuval Mor)的电子备案通知的无纸命令,Phillip A.迈克尔·E·希尔凯文·B·威廉姆斯柯林斯和乔纳森·M。斯珀林。由治安法官乔纳森·古德曼于2024年5月29日签署。
|
05/29/2024 | PAPERLESS OMNIBUS SEALED ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Sealed ex parte Contingent Motion for Entry of Preliminary Injunction (DE 14) ("Contingent Motion") and Plaintiff's Sealed ex parte Expedited Motion for Expedited Disposition (DE 15) ("Expedited Motion"). The Contingent Motion seeks conditional relief that the Court is unable to provide. The Expedited Motion does not set forth in detail the reason a ruling is needed by the stated date and therefore fails to comply with Southern District of Florida Local Rule 7.1(d)(2). Accordingly, upon review of the record, the Contingent Motion (DE 14) and the Expedited Motion (DE 15) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 5/29/2024. (rm04) Modified to Unseal per DE 46 on 8/8/2024
译文:无纸化Omnibus密封订单。本案已提交法院审理,原告单方面密封的临时禁令或有动议(DE 14)(“或有动议”)和原告单方面密封的快速处置动议(DE 15)(“快速动议”)。应急动议寻求法院无法提供的有条件救济。快速动议没有详细说明需要在规定日期之前做出裁决的原因,因此不符合佛罗里达州南区地方规则7.1(d)(2)。因此,在审查记录后,意外动议(DE 14)和快速动议(DE 15)被拒绝。凯瑟琳·M法官签署威廉姆斯于2024年5月29日。(rm 04)根据DE 46于2024年8月8日修改为解封
|
案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。
诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮